Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Utsav Singh

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

CRISP: Curriculum-Inducing Primitive Informed Subgoal Prediction for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

  • Utsav Singh
  • Vinay P. Namboodiri

Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) leverages temporal abstraction to efficiently tackle complex long-horizon tasks. However, HRL often collapses because the low-level primitive’s continual updates make earlier sub-goals issued by the high-level policy obsolete, introducing non-stationarity that destabilizes training. We propose CRISP, a curriculum-driven framework that tackles this instability with three key ingredients: (1) primitive-informed parsing (PIP), which adaptively re-labels a handful of expert demonstrations to always generate reachable subgoals by the current low-level primitive; (2) an inverse-reinforcement-learning regularizer that steers the high-level policy toward the expert-induced subgoal distribution and stabilizes learning; and (3) a unified training loop that leverages these components to boost sample efficiency. Across six sparse-reward robotic navigation and manipulation benchmarks, CRISP improves success rates by more than 40% over strong hierarchical and flat baselines and successfully transfers to real-world tasks, demonstrating the promise of curriculum-based HRL for practical scenarios.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

On the Sample Complexity Bounds of Bilevel Reinforcement Learning

  • Mudit Gaur
  • Utsav Singh
  • Amrit Singh Bedi
  • Raghu Pasupathy
  • Vaneet Aggarwal

Bilevel reinforcement learning (BRL) has emerged as a powerful framework for aligning generative models, yet its theoretical foundations, especially sample complexity bounds, remain relatively underexplored. In this work, we present the first sample complexity bound for BRL, establishing a rate of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-3})$ in continuous state-action spaces. Traditional MDP analysis techniques do not extend to BRL due to its nested structure and non-convex lower-level problems. We overcome these challenges by leveraging the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition and the MDP structure to obtain closed-form gradients, enabling tight sample complexity analysis. Our analysis also extends to general bi-level optimization settings with non-convex lower levels, where we achieve state-of-the-art sample complexity results of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-3})$ improving upon existing bounds of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-6})$. Additionally, we address the computational bottleneck of hypergradient estimation by proposing a fully first-order, Hessian-free algorithm suitable for large-scale problems.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

PEAR: Primitive Enabled Adaptive Relabeling for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

  • Utsav Singh
  • Vinay P. Namboodiri

Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) has the potential to solve complex long horizon tasks using temporal abstraction and increased exploration. However, hierarchical agents are difficult to train due to inherent non-stationarity. We present primitive enabled adaptive relabeling (PEAR), a two-phase approach where we first perform adaptive relabeling on a few expert demonstrations to generate efficient subgoal supervision, and then jointly optimize HRL agents by employing reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL). We perform theoretical analysis to bound the sub-optimality of our approach and derive a joint optimization framework using RL and IL. Since PEAR utilizes only a few expert demonstrations and considers minimal limiting assumptions on the task structure, it can be easily integrated with typical off-policy \RL algorithms to produce a practical HRL approach. We perform extensive experiments on challenging environments and show that PEAR is able to outperform various hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines and achieve upto 80% success rates in complex sparse robotic control tasks where other baselines typically fail to show significant progress. We also perform ablations to thoroughly analyze the importance of our various design choices. Finally, we perform real world robotic experiments on complex tasks and demonstrate that PEAR consistently outperforms the baselines.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling

  • Utsav Singh
  • Wesley A. Suttle
  • Brian M. Sadler
  • Vinay P. Namboodiri
  • Amrit Singh Bedi

In this work, we introduce PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical reinforcement learning via Hindsight Relabeling, a novel approach that leverages preference-based learning to learn a reward model, and subsequently uses this reward model to relabel higher-level replay buffers. Since this reward is unaffected by lower primitive behavior, our relabeling-based approach is able to mitigate non-stationarity, which is common in existing hierarchical approaches, and demonstrates impressive performance across a range of challenging sparse-reward tasks. Since obtaining human feedback is typically impractical, we propose to replace the human-in-the-loop approach with our primitive-in-the-loop approach, which generates feedback using sparse rewards provided by the environment. Moreover, in order to prevent infeasible subgoal prediction and avoid degenerate solutions, we propose primitive-informed regularization that conditions higher-level policies to generate feasible subgoals for lower-level policies. We perform extensive experiments to show that PIPER mitigates non-stationarity in hierarchical reinforcement learning and achieves greater than 50$\%$ success rates in challenging, sparse-reward robotic environments, where most other baselines fail to achieve any significant progress.

v2026.09.13