Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Jiangjie Chen

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

14 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

14

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

ARIA: Training Language Agents with Intention-driven Reward Aggregation

  • Ruihan Yang
  • Yikai Zhang
  • Aili Chen
  • Xintao Wang
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Deqing Yang
  • Yanghua Xiao

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agents to perform complex reasoning and decision-making through free-form language interactions. However, in open-ended language action environments (e. g. , negotiation or question-asking games), the action space can be formulated as a joint distribution over tokens, resulting in an extremely large and combinatorial action space. Sampling actions in such a space can lead to extreme reward sparsity, which brings large reward variance, hindering effective reinforcement learning (RL). To address this, we propose ARIA, a method that A ggregates R ewards in I ntention space to enable efficient and effective language A gents training. ARIA aims to project natural language actions from the high-dimensional joint token distribution space into a low-dimensional intention space, where semantically similar actions are clustered and assigned shared rewards. This intention-aware reward aggregation reduces reward variance by densifying reward signals, fostering efficient and effective policy optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARIA not only significantly reduces gradient variance, but also delivers substantial performance gains of average 9. 95% across four downstream tasks (e. g. , negotiation and text-based games), consistently outperforming strong offline and online RL baselines.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

CoSER: Coordinating LLM-Based Persona Simulation of Established Roles

  • Xintao Wang 0001
  • Heng Wang
  • Yifei Zhang
  • Xinfeng Yuan
  • Rui Xu 0026
  • Jen-tse Huang 0001
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Haoran Guo

Role-playing language agents (RPLAs) have emerged as promising applications of large language models (LLMs). However, simulating established characters presents a challenging task for RPLAs, due to the lack of authentic character datasets and nuanced evaluation methods using such data. In this paper, we present CoSER, a collection of a high-quality dataset, open models, and an evaluation protocol towards effective RPLAs of established characters. The CoSER dataset covers 17, 966 characters from 771 renowned books. It provides authentic dialogues with real-world intricacies, as well as diverse data types such as character experiences and internal thoughts. Drawing from acting methodology, we introduce given-circumstance acting for training and evaluating role-playing LLMs, where LLMs sequentially portray multiple characters in book scenes. Using our dataset, we develop CoSER 8B and CoSER 70B, i. e. , advanced open role-playing LLMs built on LLaMA-3. 1 models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the value of the CoSER dataset for RPLA training, evaluation and retrieval. Moreover, CoSER 70B exhibits state-of-the-art performance surpassing or matching GPT-4o on our evaluation and three existing benchmarks, i. e. , achieving 75. 80% and 93. 47% accuracy on the InCharacter and LifeChoice benchmarks respectively. Our code, dataset and models are available at: https: //github. com/Neph0s/CoSER.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale

  • Qiying Yu
  • Zheng Zhang
  • Ruofei Zhu
  • Yufeng Yuan
  • Xiaochen Zuo
  • Yu Yue
  • Weinan Dai
  • Tiantian Fan

Inference scaling empowers LLMs with unprecedented reasoning ability, with reinforcement learning as the core technique to elicit complex reasoning. However, key technical details of state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs are concealed (such as in OpenAI o1 blog and DeepSeek R1 technical report), thus the community still struggles to reproduce their RL training results. We propose the D ecoupled Clip and D ynamic s A mpling P olicy O ptimization ( DAPO ) algorithm, and fully open-source a state-of-the-art large-scale RL system that achieves 50 points on AIME 2024 using Qwen2. 5-32B base model. Unlike previous works that withhold training details, we introduce four key techniques of our algorithm that make large-scale LLM RL a success. In addition, we open-source our training code, which is built on the verl framework, along with a carefully curated and processed dataset. These components of our open-source system enhance reproducibility and support future research in large-scale LLM RL.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Enigmata: Scaling Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models with Synthetic Verifiable Puzzles

  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Qianyu He
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Aili Chen
  • Zhicheng Cai
  • Weinan Dai
  • Hongli Yu
  • Jiaze Chen

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI’s o1 and DeepSeek’s R1, excel at advanced reasoning tasks like math and coding via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), but still struggle with puzzles solvable by humans without domain knowledge. We introduce ENIGMATA, the first comprehensive suite tailored for improving LLMs with puzzle reasoning skills. It includes 36 tasks across 7 categories, each with: 1) a generator that produces unlimited examples with controllable difficulty, and 2) a rule-based verifier for automatic evaluation. This generator-verifier design supports scalable, multi-task RL training, fine-grained analysis, and seamless RLVR integration. We further propose ENIGMATA-Eval, a rigorous benchmark, and develop optimized multi-task RLVR strategies. Our trained model, Qwen2. 5-32B-ENIGMATA, consistently surpasses o3-mini-high and o1 on the puzzle reasoning benchmarks like ENIGMATA-Eval, ARC-AGI (32. 8%), and ARC-AGI 2 (0. 6%). It also generalizes well to out-of-domain puzzle benchmarks and mathematical reasoning, with little multi-tasking trade-off. When trained on larger models like Seed1. 5-Thinking (20B activated parameters and 200B total parameters), puzzle data from ENIGMATA further boosts SoTA performance on advanced math and STEM reasoning tasks such as AIME (2024-2025), BeyondAIME and GPQA (Diamond), showing nice generalization benefits of ENIGMATA. This work offers a unified, controllable framework for advancing logical reasoning in LLMs. Project page: https: //seed-enigmata. github. io.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

KORGym: A Dynamic Game Platform for LLM Reasoning Evaluation

  • Jiajun Shi
  • Jian Yang
  • Jiaheng Liu
  • Xingyuan Bu
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Junting Zhou
  • Kaijing Ma
  • Zhoufutu Wen

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) underscore the need for more comprehensive evaluation methods to accurately assess their reasoning capabilities. Existing benchmarks are often domain-specific and thus cannot fully capture an LLM’s general reasoning potential. To address this limitation, we introduce the Knowledge Orthogonal Reasoning Gymnasium (KORGym), a dynamic evaluation platform inspired by KOR-Bench and Gymnasium. KORGym offers over fifty games in either textual or visual formats and supports interactive, multi-turn assessments with reinforcement learning scenarios. Using KORGym, we conduct extensive experiments on 19 LLMs and 8 VLMs, revealing consistent reasoning patterns within model families and demonstrating the superior performance of closed-source models. Further analysis examines the effects of modality, reasoning strategies, reinforcement learning techniques, and response length on model performance. We expect KORGym to become a valuable resource for advancing LLM reasoning research and developing evaluation methodologies suited to complex, interactive environments.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

ORIGAMISPACE: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs in Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning with Mathematical Constraints

  • Rui Xu
  • Dakuan Lu
  • Zicheng Zhao
  • Xiaoyu Tan
  • Xintao Wang
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Yinghui Xu

Spatial reasoning is a key capability in the field of artificial intelligence, especially crucial in areas such as robotics, computer vision, and natural language understanding. However, evaluating the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in complex spatial reasoning still faces challenges, particularly in scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning and precise mathematical constraints. This paper introduces ORIGAMISPACE, a new dataset and benchmark designed to evaluate the multi-step spatial reasoning ability and the capacity to handle mathematical constraints of MLLMs through origami tasks. The dataset contains 350 data instances, each comprising a strictly formatted crease pattern (CP diagram), the Compiled Flat Pattern, the complete Folding Process, and the final Folded Shape Image. We propose four evaluation tasks: Pattern Prediction, Multi-step Spatial Reasoning, Spatial Relationship Prediction, and End-to-End CP Code Generation. For the CP code generation task, we design an interactive environment and explore the possibility of using reinforcement learning methods to train MLLMs. Through experiments on existing MLLMs, we initially reveal the strengths and weaknesses of these models in handling complex spatial reasoning tasks.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts

  • Jian Xie
  • Kai Zhang 0033
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Renze Lou
  • Yu Su 0001

By providing external information to large language models (LLMs), tool augmentation (including retrieval augmentation) has emerged as a promising solution for addressing the limitations of LLMs' static parametric memory. However, how receptive are LLMs to such external evidence, especially when the evidence conflicts with their parametric memory? We present the first comprehensive and controlled investigation into the behavior of LLMs when encountering knowledge conflicts. We propose a systematic framework to elicit high-quality parametric memory from LLMs and construct the corresponding counter-memory, which enables us to conduct a series of controlled experiments. Our investigation reveals seemingly contradicting behaviors of LLMs. On the one hand, different from prior wisdom, we find that LLMs can be highly receptive to external evidence even when that conflicts with their parametric memory, given that the external evidence is coherent and convincing. On the other hand, LLMs also demonstrate a strong confirmation bias when the external evidence contains some information that is consistent with their parametric memory, despite being presented with conflicting evidence at the same time. These results pose important implications that are worth careful consideration for the further development and deployment of tool- and retrieval-augmented LLMs. Resources are available at https://github.com/OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict.

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents

  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Xintao Wang
  • Rui Xu
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Yikai Zhang
  • Wei Shi
  • Jian Xie
  • Shuang Li

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly boosted the rise of Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs), i.e., specialized AI systems designed to simulate assigned personas. By harnessing multiple advanced abilities of LLMs, including in-context learning, instruction following, and social intelligence, RPLAs achieve a remarkable sense of human likeness and vivid role-playing performance. RPLAs can mimic a wide range of personas, ranging from historical figures and fictional characters to real-life individuals. Consequently, they have catalyzed numerous AI applications, such as emotional companions, interactive video games, personalized assistants and copilots, and digital clones. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey of this field, illustrating the evolution and recent progress in RPLAs integrating with cutting-edge LLM technologies. We categorize personas into three types: 1) Demographic Persona, which leverages statistical stereotypes; 2) Character Persona, focused on well-established figures; and 3) Individualized Persona, customized through ongoing user interactions for personalized services. We begin by presenting a comprehensive overview of current methodologies for RPLAs, followed by the details for each persona type, covering corresponding data sourcing, agent construction, and evaluation. Afterward, we discuss the fundamental risks, existing limitations, and prospects of RPLAs. Additionally, we provide a brief review of RPLAs in AI products in the market, which reflects practical user demands that shape and drive RPLA research. Through this survey, we aim to establish a clear taxonomy of RPLA research and applications, facilitate future research in this critical and ever-evolving field, and pave the way for a future where humans and RPLAs coexist in harmony.

AAAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Translate Meanings, Not Just Words: IdiomKB’s Role in Optimizing Idiomatic Translation with Language Models

  • Shuang Li
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Siyu Yuan
  • Xinyi Wu
  • Hao Yang
  • Shimin Tao
  • Yanghua Xiao

To translate well, machine translation (MT) systems and general-purposed language models (LMs) need a deep understanding of both source and target languages and cultures. Therefore, idioms, with their non-compositional nature, pose particular challenges for Transformer-based systems, as literal translations often miss the intended meaning. Traditional methods, which replace idioms using existing knowledge bases (KBs), often lack scale and context-awareness. Addressing these challenges, our approach prioritizes context-awareness and scalability, allowing for offline storage of idioms in a manageable KB size. This ensures efficient serving with smaller models and provides a more comprehensive understanding of idiomatic expressions. We introduce a multilingual idiom KB (IdiomKB) developed using large LMs to address this. This KB facilitates better translation by smaller models, such as BLOOMZ (7.1B), Alpaca (7B), and InstructGPT (6.7B), by retrieving idioms' figurative meanings. We present a novel, GPT-4-powered metric for human-aligned evaluation, demonstrating that IdiomKB considerably boosts model performance. Human evaluations further validate our KB's quality.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents

  • Jian Xie
  • Kai Zhang 0033
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Tinghui Zhu
  • Renze Lou
  • Yuandong Tian
  • Yanghua Xiao
  • Yu Su 0001

Planning has been part of the core pursuit for artificial intelligence since its conception, but earlier AI agents mostly focused on constrained settings because many of the cognitive substrates necessary for human-level planning have been lacking. Recently, language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown interesting capabilities such as tool use and reasoning. Are these language agents capable of planning in more complex settings that are out of the reach of prior AI agents? To advance this investigation, we propose TravelPlanner, a new planning benchmark that focuses on travel planning, a common real-world planning scenario. It provides a rich sandbox environment, various tools for accessing nearly four million data records, and 1, 225 meticulously curated planning intents and reference plans. Comprehensive evaluations show that the current language agents are not yet capable of handling such complex planning tasks—even GPT-4 only achieves a success rate of 0. 6%. Language agents struggle to stay on task, use the right tools to collect information, or keep track of multiple constraints. However, we note that the mere possibility for language agents to tackle such a complex problem is in itself non-trivial progress. TravelPlanner provides a challenging yet meaningful testbed for future language agents.

AAAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Converge to the Truth: Factual Error Correction via Iterative Constrained Editing

  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Rui Xu
  • Wenxuan Zeng
  • Changzhi Sun
  • Lei Li
  • Yanghua Xiao

Given a possibly false claim sentence, how can we automatically correct it with minimal editing? Existing methods either require a large number of pairs of false and corrected claims for supervised training or do not handle well errors spanning over multiple tokens within an utterance. In this paper, we propose VENCE, a novel method for factual error correction (FEC) with minimal edits. VENCE formulates the FEC problem as iterative sampling editing actions with respect to a target density function. We carefully design the target function with predicted truthfulness scores from an offline trained fact verification model. VENCE samples the most probable editing positions based on back-calculated gradients of the truthfulness score concerning input tokens and the editing actions using a distantly-supervised language model (T5). Experiments on a public dataset show that VENCE improves the well-adopted SARI metric by 5.3 (or a relative improvement of 11.8%) over the previous best distantly-supervised methods.

AAAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Unsupervised Explanation Generation via Correct Instantiations

  • Sijie Cheng
  • Zhiyong Wu
  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Zhixing Li
  • Yang Liu
  • Lingpeng Kong

While large pre-trained language models (PLM) have shown their great skills at solving discriminative tasks, a significant gap remains when compared with humans for explanation-related tasks. Among them, explaining the reason why a statement is wrong (e.g., against commonsense) is incredibly challenging. The major difficulty is finding the conflict point, where the statement contradicts our real world. This paper proposes Neon, a two-phrase, unsupervised explanation generation framework. Neon first generates corrected instantiations of the statement (phase I), then uses them to prompt large PLMs to find the conflict point and complete the explanation (phase II). We conduct extensive experiments on two standard explanation benchmarks, i.e., ComVE and e-SNLI. According to both automatic and human evaluations, Neon outperforms baselines, even for those with human-annotated instantiations. In addition to explaining a negative prediction, we further demonstrate that Neon remains effective when generalizing to different scenarios. The resources of Neon are available at: https://github.com/Shark-NLP/Neon.

AAAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

LOREN: Logic-Regularized Reasoning for Interpretable Fact Verification

  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Qiaoben Bao
  • Changzhi Sun
  • Xinbo Zhang
  • Jiaze Chen
  • Hao Zhou
  • Yanghua Xiao
  • Lei Li

Given a natural language statement, how to verify its veracity against a large-scale textual knowledge source like Wikipedia? Most existing neural models make predictions without giving clues about which part of a false claim goes wrong. In this paper, we propose LOREN, an approach for interpretable fact verification. We decompose the verification of the whole claim at phrase-level, where the veracity of the phrases serves as explanations and can be aggregated into the final verdict according to logical rules. The key insight of LOREN is to represent claim phrase veracity as three-valued latent variables, which are regularized by aggregation logical rules. The final claim verification is based on all latent variables. Thus, LOREN enjoys the additional benefit of interpretability — it is easy to explain how it reaches certain results with claim phrase veracity. Experiments on a public fact verification benchmark show that LOREN is competitive against previous approaches while enjoying the merit of faithful and accurate interpretability. The resources of LOREN are available at: https: //github. com/jiangjiechen/LOREN.

AAAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Unsupervised Editing for Counterfactual Stories

  • Jiangjie Chen
  • Chun Gan
  • Sijie Cheng
  • Hao Zhou
  • Yanghua Xiao
  • Lei Li

Creating what-if stories requires reasoning about prior statements and possible outcomes of the changed conditions. One can easily generate coherent endings under new conditions, but it would be challenging for current systems to do it with minimal changes to the original story. Therefore, one major challenge is the trade-off between generating a logical story and rewriting with minimal-edits. In this paper, we propose EDUCAT, an editing-based unsupervised approach for counterfactual story rewriting. EDUCAT includes a target position detection strategy based on estimating causal effects of the what-if conditions, which keeps the causal invariant parts of the story. EDUCAT then generates the stories under fluency, coherence and minimal-edits constraints. We also propose a new metric to alleviate the shortcomings of current automatic metrics and better evaluate the trade-off. We evaluate EDU- CAT on a public counterfactual story rewriting benchmark. Experiments show that EDUCAT achieves the best trade-off over unsupervised SOTA methods according to both automatic and human evaluation. The resources of EDUCAT are available at: https: //github. com/jiangjiechen/EDUCAT.

v2026.09.13