Adaptive data-driven motion detection and optimized correction for brain PET

C-RAC) as compared to Vicra while NMC, FIR1, FIR2 and 1DCOD yielded -14.9 ± 9.0% (-24.5 ± 14.6%), -3.6 ± 4.9% (-13.4 ± 14.3%), -0.6 ± 3.4% (-6.7 ± 5.3%) and -1.5 ± 4.2% (-2.2 ± 4.1%), respectively. In summary, the proposed motion correction method yielded comparable performance to the hardware-based motion tracking method for multiple tracers, including very challenging cases with large frequent head motion, in studies performed on a non-TOF scanner.

Authors

• Enette Mae Revilla
• Jean-Dominique Gallezot
• Mika Naganawa
• Takuya Toyonaga
• Kathryn Fontaine
• Tim Mulnix
• John A. Onofrey
• Richard E. Carson
• Yihuan Lu

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.