Think or Not? Selective Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Language Models

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven to be an effective post-training strategy for enhancing reasoning in vision–language models (VLMs). Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a recent prominent method that encourages models to generate complete reasoning traces before answering, leading to increased token usage and computational cost. Inspired by the human-like thinking process—where people skip reasoning for easy questions but think carefully when needed—we explore how to enable VLMs to first decide when reasoning is necessary. To realize this, we propose \ours, a two-stage training strategy: (i) a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage with a simple yet effective “ thought dropout ” operation, where reasoning traces are randomly replaced with empty thoughts. This introduces a think-or-not format that serves as a cold start for selective reasoning; (ii) a GRPO stage that enables the model to freely explore when to think or not, while maximizing task-aware outcome rewards. Experimental results show that \ours can reduce the completion length by up to 90% compared to vanilla GRPO, without sacrificing performance or even improving it. Further evaluations across LLM (GSM8K), VLM (CLEVR, Super-CLEVR, GeoQA), and Agentic (AITZ) tasks—covering a range of reasoning difficulties under both 3B and 7B models—consistently reveal that the \textit{model progressively learns to bypass unnecessary reasoning steps as training advances}. These findings shed light on the path toward human-like reasoning patterns in RL approaches. Our code is available at https: //github. com/kokolerk/TON.

Authors

• Jiaqi Wang Jarvis Research Center, Tencent YouTu Lab
• Kevin Qinghong Lin National University of Singapore
• James Cheng The Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Mike Zheng Shou National University of Singapore

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.