Privacy Reasoning in Ambiguous Contexts

We study the ability of language models to reason about appropriate information disclosure - a central aspect of the evolving field of agentic privacy. Whereas previous works have focused on evaluating a model's ability to align with human decisions, we examine the role of ambiguity and missing context on model performance when making information-sharing decisions. We identify context ambiguity as a crucial barrier for high performance in privacy assessments. By designing Camber, a framework for context disambiguation, we show that model-generated decision rationales can reveal ambiguities and that systematically disambiguating context based on these rationales leads to significant accuracy improvements (up to 13. 3% in precision and up to 22. 3% in recall) as well as reductions in prompt sensitivity. Overall, our results indicate that approaches for context disambiguation are a promising way forward to enhance agentic privacy reasoning.

Authors

• Ren Yi
• Octavian Suciu
• Adrian Gascon
• Sarah Meiklejohn
• Eugene Bagdasarian
• Marco Gruteser

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.