Can Large Language Model Agents Simulate Human Trust Behavior?

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have been increasingly adopted as simulation tools to model humans in social science and role-playing applications. However, one fundamental question remains: can LLM agents really simulate human behavior? In this paper, we focus on one critical and elemental behavior in human interactions, trust, and investigate whether LLM agents can simulate human trust behavior. We first find that LLM agents generally exhibit trust behavior, referred to as agent trust, under the framework of Trust Games, which are widely recognized in behavioral economics. Then, we discover that GPT-4 agents manifest high behavioral alignment with humans in terms of trust behavior, indicating the feasibility of simulating human trust behavior with LLM agents. In addition, we probe the biases of agent trust and differences in agent trust towards other LLM agents and humans. We also explore the intrinsic properties of agent trust under conditions including external manipulations and advanced reasoning strategies. Our study provides new insights into the behaviors of LLM agents and the fundamental analogy between LLMs and humans beyond value alignment. We further illustrate broader implications of our discoveries for applications where trust is paramount.

Authors

• Feiran Jia
• Ziyu Ye
• Shiyang Lai The University of Chicago
• Kai Shu Illinois Institute of Technology
• Jindong Gu University of Oxford, Oxford, England
• Adel Bibi University of Oxford
• Ziniu Hu
• David Jurgens
• James Evans
• Philip H. Torr
• Bernard Ghanem King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
• Guohao Li Nanjing University
• Chengxing Xie
• Canyu Chen

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.