Argumentation Semantics as Formal Discussion.

In the current review paper, we provide an overview of how mainstream argumentation semantics can be interpreted in terms of structured discussion. The idea is that an argument is justified according to a particular argumentation semantics iff it is possible to win a discussion of a particular type. Hence, different argumentation semantics correspond to different types of discussion. Our aim is to provide an overview of what these discussions look like, and their formal correspondence to argumentation semantics.

Authors

• Martin Caminada

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.