JELV: A Judge of Edit-Level Validity for Evaluation and Automated Reference Expansion in Grammatical Error Correction

Existing Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) systems suffer from limited reference diversity, leading to underestimated evaluation and restricted model generalization. To address this issue, we introduce the Judge of Edit-Level Validity (JELV), an automated framework to validate correction edits from grammaticality, faithfulness, and fluency. Using our proposed human-annotated Pair-wise Edit-level Validity Dataset (PEVData) as benchmark, JELV offers two implementations: a multi-turn LLM-as-Judges pipeline achieving 90% agreement with human annotators, and a distilled DeBERTa classifier with 85% precision on valid edits. We then apply JELV to reclassify misjudged false positives in evaluation and derive a comprehensive evaluation metric by integrating false positive decoupling and fluency scoring, resulting in state-of-the-art correlation with human judgments. We also apply JELV to filter LLM-generated correction candidates, expanding the BEA19's single-reference dataset containing 38,692 source sentences. Retraining top GEC systems on this expanded dataset yields measurable performance gains. JELV provides a scalable solution for enhancing reference diversity and strengthening both evaluation and model generalization.

Authors

• Yuhao Zhan Zhejiang University
• Yuqing Zhang
• Jing Yuan University of North Texas
• Qixiang Ma Zhejiang University
• Zhiqi Yang Zhejiang University
• Yu Gu Tencent AI Lab
• Zemin Liu National University of Singapore, Singapore
• Fei Wu Zhejiang University

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.