Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumentative explanations in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation. We propose new defence and acceptability semantics, which operates on both attack and support relations, and use them to formalize two types of explanations, concise and strong explanations. We also show how to compute the explanations with Bipolar Dispute Trees.

Authors

• Zhiwei Zeng School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
• Chunyan Miao Nanyang Technological University
• Cyril Leung
• Zhiqi Shen Nanyang Technological University
• Jing Jih Chin

Keywords

No keywords are indexed for this paper.