Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Zhiheng Lyu

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

5

TMLR Journal 2026 Journal Article

BrowserAgent: Building Web Agents with Human-Inspired Web Browsing Actions

  • Tao Yu
  • Zhengbo Zhang
  • Zhiheng Lyu
  • Junhao Gong
  • Hongzhu Yi
  • Xinming Wang
  • Yuxuan Zhou
  • Jiabing Yang

Efficiently solving real-world problems with LLMs increasingly hinges on their ability to interact with dynamic web environments and autonomously acquire external information. While recent research like Search-R1 and WebDancer demonstrates strong performance in solving web tasks, they heavily rely on additional tools to convert the interactive web environment into static text content. This is in contrast to human browsing behaviors, which involve diverse interactions with the browser, such as scrolling, clicking, and typing. In this paper, we propose BrowserAgent, a more interactive agent that solves complex tasks through human-inspired browser actions. BrowserAgent operates directly on raw web pages via Playwright through a set of predefined browser actions. We adopt a two-stage training (Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Rejection Fine-Tuning (RFT)) to improve the model's generalization abilities. Despite using significantly less training data than Search-R1, BrowserAgent achieves more competitive results across different Open-QA tasks. Additionally, we introduce an explicit memory mechanism to store key conclusions across steps, further enhancing the model's reasoning capabilities for long-horizon tasks. Notably, BrowserAgent-7B can achieve around 20\% improvement over Search-R1 on multi-hop QA tasks like HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and Bamboogle. These results indicate that BrowserAgent can serve as a more advanced framework for more interactive and scalable web agents.

TMLR Journal 2026 Journal Article

StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs' Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputs

  • Jialin Yang
  • Dongfu Jiang
  • Tony He
  • Sherman Siu
  • Yuxuan Zhang
  • Disen Liao
  • Zhuofeng Li
  • Huaye Zeng

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integral to software development workflows, their ability to generate structured outputs has become critically important. We introduce $\textbf{StructEval}$, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in producing both non-renderable (JSON, YAML, CSV) and renderable (HTML, React, SVG) structured formats. Unlike prior benchmarks, StructEval systematically evaluates structural fidelity across diverse formats through two paradigms: $\textbf{1)}$ generation tasks, producing structured output from natural language prompts, and $\textbf{2)}$ conversion tasks, translating between structured formats. Our benchmark encompasses 18 formats and 44 types of task, with novel metrics for format adherence and structural correctness. Results reveal significant performance gaps—even state-of-the-art models like o1-mini achieve only $75.58$ average score, with open-source alternatives lagging approximately $10$ points behind. We find generation tasks more challenging than conversion tasks, and producing correct visual content more difficult than generating text-only structures.

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

PixelWorld: Towards Perceiving Everything as Pixels

  • Zhiheng Lyu
  • Xueguang Ma
  • Wenhu Chen

Recent agentic language models increasingly accept raw camera pixels rather than tokenized text, underscoring the need for a unified perception paradigm. We explore this idea through Perceive Everything as Pixels (PEAP) and release PixelWorld, a benchmark that renders natural-language, tabular, mathematical and diagrammatic inputs into a single pixel space. Experiments show that PEAP attains competitive accuracy on semantic-understanding tasks, indicating that a vision transformer can capture global textual semantics without explicit tokens. In contrast, reasoning-intensive benchmarks (math and code) exhibit sharp performance drops; however, Chain-of-Thought prompting partially mitigates this gap, hinting that explicit reasoning traces compensate for the missing token structure. We also observe that scenarios with tightly intertwined visual--text cues benefit from the unified pixel view, reducing preprocessing overhead and ambiguity relative to split-modality baselines. PixelWorld therefore provides a compact yet challenging yardstick and encourages wider adoption of PEAP for holistic evaluation of next-generation vision–language agents.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Can Large Language Models Infer Causation from Correlation?

  • Zhijing Jin 0001
  • Jiarui Liu 0004
  • Zhiheng Lyu
  • Spencer Poff
  • Mrinmaya Sachan
  • Rada Mihalcea
  • Mona T. Diab
  • Bernhard Schölkopf

Causal inference is one of the hallmarks of human intelligence. While the field of CausalNLP has attracted much interest in the recent years, existing causal inference datasets in NLP primarily rely on discovering causality from empirical knowledge (e.g., commonsense knowledge). In this work, we propose the first benchmark dataset to test the pure causal inference skills of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we formulate a novel task Corr2Cause, which takes a set of correlational statements and determines the causal relationship between the variables. We curate a large-scale dataset of more than 200K samples, on which we evaluate seventeen existing LLMs. Through our experiments, we identify a key shortcoming of LLMs in terms of their causal inference skills, and show that these models achieve almost close to random performance on the task. This shortcoming is somewhat mitigated when we try to re-purpose LLMs for this skill via finetuning, but we find that these models still fail to generalize – they can only perform causal inference in in-distribution settings when variable names and textual expressions used in the queries are similar to those in the training set, but fail in out-of-distribution settings generated by perturbing these queries. Corr2Cause is a challenging task for LLMs, and can be helpful in guiding future research on improving LLMs’ pure reasoning skills and generalizability. Our data is at https://huggingface.co/datasets/causalnlp/corr2cause. Our code is at https://github.com/causalNLP/corr2cause.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

CLadder: Assessing Causal Reasoning in Language Models

  • Zhijing Jin
  • Yuen Chen
  • Felix Leeb
  • Luigi Gresele
  • Ojasv Kamal
  • Zhiheng Lyu
  • Kevin Blin
  • Fernando Gonzalez Adauto

The ability to perform causal reasoning is widely considered a core feature of intelligence. In this work, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can coherently reason about causality. Much of the existing work in natural language processing (NLP) focuses on evaluating commonsense causal reasoning in LLMs, thus failing to assess whether a model can perform causal inference in accordance with a set of well-defined formal rules. To address this, we propose a new NLP task, causal inference in natural language, inspired by the "causal inference engine" postulated by Judea Pearl et al. We compose a large dataset, CLadder, with 10K samples: based on a collection of causal graphs and queries (associational, interventional, and counterfactual), we obtain symbolic questions and ground-truth answers, through an oracle causal inference engine. These are then translated into natural language. We evaluate multiple LLMs on our dataset, and we introduce and evaluate a bespoke chain-of-thought prompting strategy, CausalCoT. We show that our task is highly challenging for LLMs, and we conduct an in-depth analysis to gain deeper insight into the causal reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our data is open-sourced at https: //huggingface. co/datasets/causalNLP/cladder, and our code can be found at https: //github. com/causalNLP/cladder.

v2026.09.13