Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Yangfan Liu

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Promising Multi-Granularity Linguistic Steganography by Jointing Syntactic and Lexical Manipulations

  • Chengfu Ou
  • Lingyun Xiang
  • Yangfan Liu

Existing modification-based linguistic steganography methods primarily perform linguistic manipulations within a single embedding space to conceal secret information. However, these methods are stringently constrained by the original semantics of the cover text, making it struggle to achieve a satisfactory embedding capacity in a single embedding space. In this paper, we propose a novel Multi-granularity Modification-based Linguistic Steganography framework (MMLS) that hides secret information in both syntactic space and symbolic space, enhancing syntactic naturalness and semantic coherence while further increasing embedding capacity. Specifically, MMLS utilizes a paraphrase generation model to automatically modify the syntactic structure of the given original sentence, which enables the generation of paraphrases and the preservation of semantics simultaneously. Moreover, MMLS employs a distance-aware syntactic bins coding strategy to embed part of secret information into the syntactic space. This strategy utilizes a cluster-based way to partition the implicit syntactic space into a finite number of separate zones, thus increasing the number of candidate paraphrases and avoiding the selection of semantically distorted steganographic texts. Finally, the pre-trained BERT is used to replace some words in candidate paraphrases with their synonyms. Such a design embeds the remaining secret information into symbolic space while ensuring syntactic and semantic naturalness. Experimental results demonstrate that MMLS significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of semantic coherence, embedding capacity, and security.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Learning with Partial-Label and Unlabeled Data: A Uniform Treatment for Supervision Redundancy and Insufficiency

  • Yangfan Liu
  • Jiaqi Lv
  • Xin Geng 0001
  • Ning Xu 0009

One major challenge in weakly supervised learning is learning from inexact supervision, ranging from partial labels (PLs) with redundant information to the extreme of unlabeled data with insufficient information. While recent work has made significant strides in specific inexact supervision contexts, supervision forms typically coexist in complex combinations. This is exemplified in semi-supervised partial label learning, where PLs act as the exclusive supervision in a semi-supervised setting. Current strategies addressing combined inexact scenarios are usually composite, which can lead to incremental solutions that essentially replicate existing methods. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to uniformly tackle both label redundancy and insufficiency, derived from a mutual information-based perspective. We design a label channel that facilitates dynamic label exchange within the candidate label sets, which identifies potential true labels and filters out likely incorrect ones, thereby minimizing error accumulation. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method over existing state-of-the-art PL and semi-supervised learning approaches by directly integrating them. Furthermore, our extended experiments on partial-complementary label learning underscore the flexibility of our uniform treatment in managing diverse supervision scenarios.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

What Makes Partial-Label Learning Algorithms Effective?

  • Jiaqi Lv
  • Yangfan Liu
  • Shiyu Xia
  • Ning Xu
  • Miao Xu
  • Gang Niu
  • Min-Ling Zhang
  • Masashi Sugiyama

A partial label (PL) specifies a set of candidate labels for an instance and partial-label learning (PLL) trains multi-class classifiers with PLs. Recently, many methods that incorporate techniques from other domains have shown strong potential. The expectation that stronger techniques would enhance performance has resulted in prominent PLL methods becoming not only highly complicated but also quite different from one another, making it challenging to choose the best direction for future algorithm design. While it is exciting to see higher performance, this leaves open a fundamental question: what makes a PLL method effective? We present a comprehensive empirical analysis of this question and summarize the success of PLL so far into some minimal algorithm design principles. Our findings reveal that high accuracy on benchmark-simulated datasets with PLs can misleadingly amplify the perceived effectiveness of some general techniques, which may improve representation learning but have limited impact on addressing the inherent challenges of PLs. We further identify the common behavior among successful PLL methods as a progressive transition from uniform to one-hot pseudo-labels, highlighting the critical role of mini-batch PL purification in achieving top performance. Based on our findings, we introduce a minimal working algorithm that is surprisingly simple yet effective, and propose an improved strategy to implement the design principles, suggesting a promising direction for improvements in PLL.

v2026.09.13