Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Xiwei Cheng

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Decomposed Direct Preference Optimization for Structure-Based Drug Design

  • Xiwei Cheng
  • Xiangxin Zhou
  • Yuwei Yang
  • Yu Bao
  • Quanquan Gu

Diffusion models have achieved promising results for Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD). Nevertheless, high-quality protein subpocket and ligand data are relatively scarce, which hinders the models’ generation capabilities. Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a pivotal tool for aligning generative models with human preferences. In this paper, we propose DecompDpo, a structure-based optimization method aligns diffusion models with pharmaceutical needs using multi-granularity preference pairs. DecompDpo introduces decomposition into the optimization objectives and obtains preference pairs at the molecule or decomposed substructure level based on each objective’s decomposability. Additionally, DecompDpo introduces a physics-informed energy term to ensure reasonable molecular conformations in the optimization results. Notably, DecompDpo can be effectively used for two main purposes: (1) fine-tuning pretrained diffusion models for molecule generation across various protein families, and (2) molecular optimization given a specific protein subpocket after generation. Extensive experiments on the CrossDocked2020 benchmark show that DecompDpo significantly improves model performance, achieving up to 98.5% Med. High Affinity and a 43.9% success rate for molecule generation, and 100% Med. High Affinity and a 52.1% success rate for targeted molecule optimization.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

DecompOpt: Controllable and Decomposed Diffusion Models for Structure-based Molecular Optimization

  • Xiangxin Zhou
  • Xiwei Cheng
  • Yuwei Yang
  • Yu Bao
  • Liang Wang 0001
  • Quanquan Gu

Recently, 3D generative models have shown promising performances in structure-based drug design by learning to generate ligands given target binding sites. However, only modeling the target-ligand distribution can hardly fulfill one of the main goals in drug discovery -- designing novel ligands with desired properties, e.g., high binding affinity, easily synthesizable, etc. This challenge becomes particularly pronounced when the target-ligand pairs used for training do not align with these desired properties. Moreover, most existing methods aim at solving de novo design task, while many generative scenarios requiring flexible controllability, such as R-group optimization and scaffold hopping, have received little attention. In this work, we propose DecompOpt, a structure-based molecular optimization method based on a controllable and decomposed diffusion model. DecompOpt presents a new generation paradigm which combines optimization with conditional diffusion models to achieve desired properties while adhering to the molecular grammar. Additionally, DecompOpt offers a unified framework covering both de novo design and controllable generation. To achieve so, ligands are decomposed into substructures which allows fine-grained control and local optimization. Experiments show that DecompOpt can efficiently generate molecules with improved properties than strong de novo baselines, and demonstrate great potential in controllable generation tasks.

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Stability and Generalization in Free Adversarial Training

  • Xiwei Cheng
  • Kexin Fu
  • Farzan Farnia

While adversarial training methods have significantly improved the robustness of deep neural networks against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations, the generalization gap between their performance on training and test data is considerably greater than that of standard empirical risk minimization. Recent studies have aimed to connect the generalization properties of adversarially trained classifiers to the min-max optimization algorithm used in their training. In this work, we analyze the interconnections between generalization and optimization in adversarial training using the algorithmic stability framework. Specifically, our goal is to compare the generalization gap of neural networks trained using the vanilla adversarial training method, which fully optimizes perturbations at every iteration, with the free adversarial training method, which simultaneously optimizes norm-bounded perturbations and classifier parameters. We prove bounds on the generalization error of these methods, indicating that the free adversarial training method may exhibit a lower generalization gap between training and test samples due to its simultaneous min-max optimization of classifier weights and perturbation variables. We conduct several numerical experiments to evaluate the train-to-test generalization gap in vanilla and free adversarial training methods. Our empirical findings also suggest that the free adversarial training method could lead to a smaller generalization gap over a similar number of training iterations. The paper code is available at https://github.com/Xiwei-Cheng/Stability_FreeAT.