Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Xiuyi Fan

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

17 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

17

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Explainable Melanoma Diagnosis with Contrastive Learning and LLM-based Report Generation

  • Junwen Zheng
  • Xinran Xu
  • Li Rong Wang
  • Chang Cai
  • Lucinda Siyun Tan
  • Dingyuan Wang
  • Hong Liang Tey
  • Xiuyi Fan

Deep learning has demonstrated expert-level performance in melanoma classification, positioning it as a powerful tool in clinical dermatology. However, model opacity and the lack of interpretability remain critical barriers to clinical adoption, as clinicians often struggle to trust the decision-making processes of black-box models. To address this gap, we present a Cross-modal Explainable Framework for Melanoma (CEFM) that leverages contrastive learning as the core mechanism for achieving interpretability. Specifically, CEFM maps clinical criteria for melanoma diagnosis—namely Asymmetry, Border, and Color (ABC)—into the Vision Transformer embedding space using dual projection heads, thereby aligning clinical semantics with visual features. The aligned representations are subsequently translated into structured textual explanations via natural language generation, creating a transparent link between raw image data and clinical interpretation. Experiments on public datasets demonstrate 92.79% accuracy and an AUC of 0.961, along with significant improvements across multiple interpretability metrics. Qualitative analyses further show that the spatial arrangement of the learned embeddings aligns with clinicians’ application of the ABC rule, effectively bridging the gap between high-performance classification and clinical trust.

JBHI Journal 2025 Journal Article

Integrating Clinical Insights via Hierarchical Inference to Predict Conditions in Bilaterally Symmetric Organs

  • Li Rong Wang
  • Si Yin Charlene Chia
  • Vivien Cherng-Hui Yip
  • Kelvin Zhenghao Li
  • Xiuyi Fan

Substantial progress has been made in developing deep-learning models for clinical diagnosis. While excelling in diagnostics, the broader clinical decision-making process also involves establishing optimal follow-up intervals (TCU), crucial for prognosis and timely treatment. To fully support clinical practice, it is imperative that deep learning models contribute to both initial diagnosis and TCU prediction. However, relying on separate monolithic models is computationally demanding and lacks interpretability, hindering clinician trust. Our proposed bilateral model, emphasizing ophthalmological cases, offers both initial diagnoses and follow-up predictions, enhancing interpretability and trust in clinical applications as clinicians are more likely to trust recommendations, knowing the diagnosis used is correct. Inspired by clinical practice, the model integrates hierarchical inference and self-supervised learning techniques to enhance predictive accuracy and interpretability. Consisting of a sparse autoencoder, diagnosis classifier, and TCU classifier, the model leverages insights from clinicians and observations of ophthalmological datasets to capture salient features and facilitate robust learning. By employing shared weights for encoding and diagnosing each organ, the model optimizes efficiency and doubles the effective dataset size. Experimental results on an ophthalmological dataset demonstrate superior performance compared to baseline models, with the hierarchical inference structure providing valuable insights into the model's decision-making process. The bilateral model not only enhances predictive modeling for conditions affecting bilaterally symmetrical organs but also empowers clinicians with interpretable outputs crucial for informed clinical decision-making, thereby advancing clinical practice and improving patient care.

AAMAS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Context-based and Explainable Decision Making with Argumentation

  • Zhiwei Zeng
  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Chunyan Miao
  • Cyril Leung
  • Chin Jing Jih
  • Ong Yew Soon

Argumentation-based approaches to decision making have gained considerable research interest, due to their ability to select and justify decisions. In order to make better decisions, context is a key piece of information that needs to be considered. However, most existing argumentation-based models and frameworks have not modelled or reasoned with context explicitly. In this paper, we present a new argumentation-based approach for making context-based and explainable decisions. We propose a graphical representation for modelling decision problems involving varying contexts, Decision Graphs with Context (DGC), and a reasoning mechanism for making context-based decisions which relies on the Assumption-based Argumentation formalism. Based on these constructs, we introduce two types of explanations, argument explanation and context explanation, identifying the reasons for the decisions made from an argument-view and a context-view respectively.

FLAP Journal 2017 Journal Article

Assumption-based Argumentation: Disputes, Explanations, Preferences.

  • Kristijonas Cyras
  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Claudia Schulz
  • Francesca Toni

Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a form of structured argumentation with roots in non-monotonic reasoning. As in other forms of structured argumentation, notions of argument and attack are not primitive in ABA, but are instead defined in terms of other notions. In the case of ABA these other notions are those of rules in a deductive system, assumptions, and contraries. ABA is equipped with a range of computational tools, based on dispute trees and amounting to dispute derivations, and benefiting from equivalent views of the semantics of argumentation in ABA, in terms of sets of arguments and, equivalently, sets of assumptions. These computational tools can also provide the foundation for multi-agent argumentative dialogues and explanation of reasoning outputs, in various settings and senses. ABA is a flexible modelling formalism, despite its simplicity, allowing to support, in particular, various forms of non-monotonic reasoning, and reasoning with some forms of preferences and defeasible rules without requiring any additional machinery. ABA can also be naturally extended to accommodate further reasoning with preferences.

AAMAS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Two Forms of Explanations in Computational Assumption-based Argumentation

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Siyuan Liu
  • Huiguo Zhang
  • Chunyan Miao
  • Cyril Leung

Computational Assumption-based Argumentation (CABA) has been introduced to model argumentation with numerical data processing. To realize the “explanation power” of CABA, we study two forms of argumentative explanations, argument explanations and CU explanations representing diagnosis and repair, resp.

ECAI Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Explained Activity Recognition with Computational Assumption-Based Argumentation

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Siyuan Liu 0003
  • Huiguo Zhang
  • Cyril Leung
  • Chunyan Miao

Activity recognition is a key problem in multi-sensor systems. In this work, we introduce Computational Assumption-based Argumentation, an argumentation approach that seamlessly combines sensor data processing with high-level inference. Our method gives classification results comparable to machine learning based approaches with reduced training time while also giving explanations.

ECAI Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Identifying and Rewarding Subcrowds in Crowdsourcing

  • Siyuan Liu 0003
  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Chunyan Miao

Identifying and rewarding truthful workers are key to the sustainability of crowdsourcing platforms. In this paper, we present a clustering based rewarding mechanism that rewards workers based on their truthfulness while accommodating the differences in workers' preferences. Experimental results show that the proposed approach can effectively discover subcrowds under various conditions, and truthful workers are better rewarded than less truthful ones.

AAMAS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

On the Interplay between Games, Argumentation and Dialogues

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

Game theory, argumentation and dialogues all address problems concerning inter-agent interaction, but from different perspectives. In this paper, we contribute to the study of the interplay between these fields. In particular, we show that by mapping games in normal form into structured argumentation, computing dominant solutions and Nash equilibria is equivalent to computing admissible sets of arguments. Moreover, when agents lack complete information, computing dominant solutions/Nash equilibria is equivalent to constructing successful (argumentation-based) dialogues. Finally, we study agents’ behaviour in these dialogues in reverse game-theoretic terms and show that, using specific notions of utility, agents engaged in (argumentation-based) dialogues are guaranteed to be truthful and disclose relevant information, and thus can converge to dominant solutions/Nash equilibria of the original games even under incomplete information.

AAAI Conference 2015 Conference Paper

On Computing Explanations in Argumentation

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

Argumentation can be viewed as a process of generating explanations. However, existing argumentation semantics are developed for identifying acceptable arguments within a set, rather than giving concrete justifications for them. In this work, we propose a new argumentation semantics, related admissibility, designed for giving explanations to arguments in both Abstract Argumentation and Assumption-based Argumentation. We identify different types of explanations defined in terms of the new semantics. We also give a correct computational counterpart for explanations using dispute forests.

AIJ Journal 2014 Journal Article

A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

We propose a formal model for argumentation-based dialogues between agents, using assumption-based argumentation (ABA) as the underlying argumentation framework. Thus, the dialogues amount to conducting an argumentation process in ABA. The model is given in terms of ABA-specific utterances, debate trees and forests implicitly built during and drawn from dialogues, legal-move functions (amounting to protocols) and outcome functions. The model is generic in that it is not restricted to any specific dialogue types and can be used to support a wide range thereof. We prove a formal connection between dialogues and three well-known argumentation semantics (i. e. grounded, admissible and ideal extensions), by giving soundness results for our dialogue models with respect to these semantics. Thus, our dialogues can be seen as a distributed mechanism for successfully determining acceptability of claims (with respect to the semantics considered), while constructing argumentation frameworks and arguments for these claims.

ECAI Conference 2014 Conference Paper

On Computing Explanations in Abstract Argumentation

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

Argumentation can be viewed as a process of generating explanations. We propose a new argumentation semantics, related admissibility, for closely capturing explanations in Abstract Argumentation, and distinguish between compact and verbose explanations. We show that dispute forests, composed of dispute trees, can be used to correctly compute these explanations.

ECAI Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Agent Strategies for ABA-based Information-seeking and Inquiry Dialogues

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

Much research has been devoted to the use of argumentation to support inter-agent dialogues. Here, we contribute to this line of research by investigating the strategic behaviour of agents in argumentation-based dialogues, using Assumption-Based-Argumentation (ABA) as the underlying framework. We will focus on information-seeking and inquiry dialogues, giving formalisations thereof and showing how they can be supported by specific classes of strategy-move functions for agents to select suitable utterances.

AAMAS Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Agent Dialogues and Argumentation

  • Xiuyi Fan

Agents have different interests and desires. Agents also hold different beliefs and assumptions. To accomplish tasks jointly, agents need to better convey information between each other and facilitate fair negotiations. In this thesis, we investigate agent dialogue systems developed with the Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework. Agents represent their beliefs and desires in ABA. Knowledge is exchanged via ABA arguments through dialogues. Main contributions include (1) understanding the connection between dialogues and argumentation frameworks and (2) applying argumentation dialogues in various agent applications.

IJCAI Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Assumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

We propose a formal model for argumentationbased dialogues between agents, using assumptionbased argumentation (ABA). The model is given in terms of ABA-specific utterances, trees drawn from dialogues and legal-move and outcome functions. We prove a formal connection between these dialogues and argumentation semantics. We illustrate persuasion as an application of the dialogue model.

AAMAS Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Conflict Resolution with Argumentation Dialogues

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Francesca Toni

Conflicts exist in multi-agent systems for a number of reasons: agents have different interests and desires; agents hold different beliefs; agents make different assumptions. To resolve conflicts, agents need to better convey information to each other and facilitate fair negotiations yielding jointly agreeable outcomes. We present a two-agent, dialogical conflict resolution scheme developed with the Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework.

ICRA Conference 2010 Conference Paper

Integrated planning and control of large tracked vehicles in open terrain

  • Xiuyi Fan
  • Surya P. N. Singh
  • Florian Oppolzer
  • Eric Nettleton
  • Ross Hennessy
  • Alexander Lowe
  • Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte

Trajectory generation and control of large equipment in open field environments involves systematically and robustly operating in uncertain and dynamic terrain. This paper presents an integrated motion planning and control system for tracked vehicles. Flexible path-end adjustments and adaptive look-ahead are introduced to a state lattice planning approach with waypoint control. For a given processing horizon, this increases search coverage and reduces planning error. This tramming approach has been successfully fielded on a 98-ton autonomous blast hole drill rig used in iron ore mining in Western Australia. The system has undergone extensive testing and is now integrated into a production environment. This work is a key element in a larger program aimed at developing a fully autonomous, remotely operated mine.

v2026.09.13