Author name cluster

Xiaojin Fu

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

6 papers

2 author rows

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling

Ziyang Xiao
Yuan Jessica Wang
Xiongwei Han
Shisi Guan
Jingyan Zhu
Jingrong Xie
Lilin Xu
Han Wu

Optimization modeling plays a critical role in supporting optimal decision-making across various domains. Previous works have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) tailored for optimization modeling have significantly automated and simplified this process. However, these models typically employ a straightforward input-output paradigm and struggle with challenging instances. In contrast, recent advances in general-purpose reasoning LLMs (RLLMs), such as DeepSeek-R1, have shown impressive capabilities in complex domains like mathematics and coding. In this paper, we introduce DeepOR, the first RLLM specifically designed for optimization modeling. Instead of directly outputting solutions, DeepOR explicitly performs multiple intermediate reasoning steps. To adapt a base LLM into an RLLM, we begin by synthesizing long chain-of-thought (CoT) data guided by a flowchart, which is automatically generated using a self-exploration algorithm. Once the training data are prepared, we employ supervised fine-tuning on the base LLM to endow it with reasoning capabilities tailored for optimization modeling. To fully leverage the model's reasoning potential, we further apply reinforcement learning with reward-shaping derived from solver feedback. Experimental results on benchmarks confirm that DeepOR consistently and significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches.

PDF Details DOI

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions

Ziyang Xiao
Jingrong Xie
Lilin Xu
Shisi Guan
Jingyan Zhu
Xiongwei Han
Xiaojin Fu
WingYin Yu

By virtue of its great utility in solving real-world problems, optimization modeling has been widely employed for optimal decision-making across various sectors, but it requires substantial expertise from operations research professionals. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), new opportunities have emerged to automate the procedure of mathematical modeling. This survey presents a comprehensive and timely review of recent advancements that cover the entire technical stack, including data synthesis and fine-tuning for the base model, inference frameworks, benchmark datasets, and performance evaluation. In addition, we conducted an in-depth analysis on the quality of benchmark datasets, which was found to have a surprisingly high error rate. We cleaned the datasets and constructed a new leaderboard with fair performance evaluation in terms of base LLM model and datasets. We also build an online portal that integrates resources of cleaned datasets, code and paper repository to benefit the community. Finally, we identify limitations in current methodologies and outline future research opportunities.

PDF Details DOI

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Decision Information Meets Large Language Models: The Future of Explainable Operations Research

Yansen Zhang
Qingcan Kang
Wing Yin Yu
Hailei Gong
Xiaojin Fu
Xiongwei Han
Tao Zhong 0004
Chen Ma 0001

Operations Research (OR) is vital for decision-making in many industries. While recent OR methods have seen significant improvements in automation and efficiency through integrating Large Language Models (LLMs), they still struggle to produce meaningful explanations. This lack of clarity raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness in OR applications. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework, Explainable Operations Research (EOR), emphasizing actionable and understandable explanations accompanying optimization. The core of EOR is the concept of Decision Information, which emerges from what-if analysis and focuses on evaluating the impact of complex constraints (or parameters) changes on decision-making. Specifically, we utilize bipartite graphs to quantify the changes in the OR model and adopt LLMs to improve the explanation capabilities. Additionally, we introduce the first industrial benchmark to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of explanations and analyses in OR, establishing a new standard for transparency and clarity in the field.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Reasoning Planning for Language Models

Ngoc Bao Nguyen
Trung Hieu Nguyen
Ruifeng She
Xiaojin Fu
Viet Anh Nguyen

Selecting an appropriate reasoning method for a given query remains a key challenge in language model generation. Existing approaches typically generate multiple candidate responses and use an aggregation strategy to select the output answer, often assuming that more candidate answers yield higher accuracy. We revisit this assumption through a rigorous theoretical analysis, deriving accuracy bounds for standard aggregation methods under fixed generation distributions and candidate sizes. Building on these insights, we introduce EPIC, an Ensemble Planning with Contrastive learning framework to learn a shared representation space that captures both model reasoning abilities and query-method compatibility. EPIC incorporates our probability bounds as a regularizer in a utility-driven optimization that balances accuracy and computational cost. Experiments on diverse mathematical reasoning tasks show that EPIC consistently selects optimal reasoning methods, improving accuracy while reducing computational overhead. Our code can be found at https: //github. com/nguyenngocbaocmt02/EPIC.

PDF Details

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Chain-of-Experts: When LLMs Meet Complex Operations Research Problems

Ziyang Xiao
Dongxiang Zhang
Yangjun Wu
Lilin Xu
Yuan Jessica Wang
Xiongwei Han
Xiaojin Fu
Tao Zhong 0004

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful techniques for various NLP tasks, such as mathematical reasoning and plan generation. In this paper, we study automatic modeling and programming for complex operation research (OR) problems, so as to alleviate the heavy dependence on domain experts and benefit a spectrum of industry sectors. We present the first LLM-based solution, namely Chain-of-Experts (CoE), a novel multi-agent cooperative framework to enhance reasoning capabilities. Specifically, each agent is assigned a specific role and endowed with domain knowledge related to OR. We also introduce a conductor to orchestrate these agents via forward thought construction and backward reflection mechanism. Furthermore, we release a benchmark dataset (ComplexOR) of complex OR problems to facilitate OR research and community development. Experimental results show that CoE significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art LLM-based approaches both on LPWP and ComplexOR.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Vision-Augmented Prompting

Ziyang Xiao
Dongxiang Zhang
Xiongwei Han
Xiaojin Fu
Yin Yu
Tao Zhong
Sai Wu
Yuan Wang

Verbal and visual-spatial information processing are two critical subsystems that activate different brain regions and often collaborate together for cognitive reasoning. Despite the rapid advancement of LLM-based reasoning, the mainstream frameworks, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants, primarily focus on the verbal dimension, resulting in limitations in tackling reasoning problems with visual and spatial clues. To bridge the gap, we propose a novel dual-modality reasoning framework called Vision-Augmented Prompting (VAP). Upon receiving a textual problem description, VAP automatically synthesizes an image from the visual and spatial clues by utilizing external drawing tools. Subsequently, VAP formulates a chain of thought in both modalities and iteratively refines the synthesized image. Finally, a conclusive reasoning scheme based on self-alignment is proposed for final result generation. Extensive experiments are conducted across four versatile tasks, including solving geometry problems, Sudoku, time series prediction, and travelling salesman problem. The results validated the superiority of VAP over existing LLMs-based reasoning frameworks.

PDF Details DOI