Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Tris Warkentin

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

2

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models

  • Avi Singh
  • John D Co-Reyes
  • Rishabh Agarwal
  • Ankesh Anand
  • Piyush Patil
  • Xavier Garcia
  • Peter J Liu
  • James Harrison

Fine-tuning language models~(LMs) on human-generated data remains a prevalent practice. However, the performance of such models is often limited by the quantity and diversity of high-quality human data. In this paper, we explore whether we can go beyond human data on tasks where we have access to scalar feedback, for example, on math problems where one can verify correctness. To do so, we investigate a simple self-training method based on expectation-maximization, which we call \method, where we (1) generate samples from the model and filter them using binary feedback, (2) fine-tune the model on these samples, and (3) repeat this process a few times. Testing on advanced MATH reasoning and APPS coding benchmarks using PaLM-2 models, we find that \method{} scales favorably with model size and significantly surpasses fine-tuning only on human data. Overall, our findings suggest self-training with feedback can reduce dependence on human-generated data.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Position: Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI

  • Meredith Ringel Morris
  • Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
  • Noah Fiedel
  • Tris Warkentin
  • Allan Dafoe
  • Aleksandra Faust
  • Clément Farabet
  • Shane Legg

We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI. To develop our framework, we analyze existing definitions of AGI, and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy. With these principles in mind, we propose “Levels of AGI” based on depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of capabilities, and reflect on how current systems fit into this ontology. We discuss the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, we discuss how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk, and emphasize the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.

v2026.09.13