Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Timothy Norman

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

8

TAAS Journal 2026 Journal Article

Client–Master Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing

  • Tesfay Zemuy Gebrekidan
  • Sebastian Stein
  • Timothy Norman

As mobile applications grow in complexity, there is an increasing need to perform computationally intensive tasks. However, User Devices (UDs), such as tablets and smartphones, have limited capacity to carry out the required computations. Task offloading in Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is a strategy that meets this demand by distributing tasks between UDs and servers. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a promising solution for this strategy because it can adapt to dynamic changes and minimize online computational complexity. However, the combination of continuous-valued soft constraints and discrete-valued hard constraints on UDs and MEC servers poses significant challenges for designing efficient DRL algorithms. Existing DRL-based task-offloading algorithms focus on the constraints of the UDs, assuming the availability of enough resources on the server. Moreover, existing Multiagent DRL (MADRL)-based task-offloading algorithms are homogeneous agents and consider homogeneous constraints as a penalty in their reward function. We propose a novel Client–Master MADRL (CMMADRL) algorithm for task offloading in MEC that uses client agents at the UDs to decide on their resource requirements and a master agent at the server to make a combinatorial action selection based on the decision of the UDs. CMMADRL is shown to achieve up to 59% improvement in performance over existing benchmark and heuristic algorithms.

AAAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Learning the Value of Teamwork to Form Efficient Teams

  • Ryan Beal
  • Narayan Changder
  • Timothy Norman
  • Sarvapali Ramchurn

In this paper we describe a novel approach to team formation based on the value of inter-agent interactions. Specifically, we propose a model of teamwork that considers outcomes from chains of interactions between agents. Based on our model, we devise a number of network metrics to capture the contribution of interactions between agents. This is then used to learn the value of teamwork from historical team performance data. We apply our model to predict team performance and validate our approach using real-world team performance data from the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Our model is shown to better predict the real-world performance of teams by up to 46% compared to models that ignore inter-agent interactions.

AAMAS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogue

  • Alice Toniolo
  • Timothy Norman
  • Katia Sycara

We present a model of argumentation-based deliberative dialogue for decision making in a team of agents. The model captures conflicts among agents’ plans due to scheduling and causality constraints, and conflicts between actions, goals and norms. We evaluate this model in complex collaborative planning problems to assess its ability to resolve such conflicts. We show that a model grounded on appropriate argumentation schemes facilitates the sharing of relevant information about plan, goal and norm conflicts. Our results show also that this information-sharing leads to more effective conflict resolution.

AAMAS Conference 2010 Conference Paper

Bootstrapping Trust Evaluations through Stereotypes

  • Chris Burnett
  • Timothy Norman
  • Katia Sycara

In open, dynamic multi-agent systems, agents may form short-term ad-hoc groups, such as coalitions, in order to meet their goals. Trust and reputation are crucial concepts in these environments, as agents must rely on their peers to perform as expected, and learn to avoid untrustworthy partners. However, ad-hoc groups introduce issues which impede the formation of trust relationships. For example, they may be short-lived, precluding agents from gaining the necessary experiences to make an accurate trust evaluation. This paper describes a new approach, inspired by theories of human organisational behaviour, whereby agents generalise their experiences with known partners as \emph{stereotypes} and apply these when evaluating new and unknown partners. We show how this approach can complement existing state of the art trust models, and enhance the confidence in the evaluations that can be made about trustees when direct and reputational information is lacking or limited.

AAMAS Conference 2010 Conference Paper

Flexible Task Resourcing for Intelligent Agents

  • Murat Sensoy
  • Wamberto W. Vasconcelos
  • Timothy Norman

In many applications, tasks can be delegated to intelligent agents. In order to carry out a task, an agent should reason about what typesof resources the task requires. However, determining the right resource types requires extensive expertise and domain knowledge. In this paper, we propose means to automate the selection of resource types that are required to fulfill tasks. Our approach combines ontological reasoning and logic programming for a flexiblematchmaking of resources to tasks. Using the proposed approach, intelligent agents can autonomously reason about the resources andtasks in various real-life settings. Using a case-study, we describeand evaluate how agents can use the proposed approach to promoteresource sharing. Our evaluations show that the proposed approachis efficient and very useful for multi-agent systems.

AAMAS Conference 2010 Conference Paper

Learning Policies through Argumentation-derived Evidence

  • Chukwuemeka Emele
  • Timothy Norman
  • Frank Guerin
  • Simon Parsons

We present an efficient approach for identifying, learningand modeling the policies of others during collaborative activities. In a set of experiments, we demonstrate that moreaccurate models of others' policies (or norms) can be developed more rapidly using various forms of evidence fromargumentation-based dialogue.

v2026.09.13