Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Tianbo Wang

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Attack the Messages, Not the Agents: A Multi-round Adaptive Stealthy Tampering Framework for LLM-MAS

  • Bingyu Yan
  • Xiaoming Zhang
  • Ziyi Zhou
  • Chaozhuo Li
  • Ruilin Zeng
  • Yirui Qi
  • Tianbo Wang
  • Litian Zhang

Large language model-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS) effectively accomplish complex and dynamic tasks through inter-agent communication, but this reliance introduces substantial safety vulnerabilities. Existing attack methods targeting LLM-MAS either compromise agent internals or rely on direct and overt persuasion, which limit their effectiveness, adaptability, and stealthiness. In this paper, we propose MAST, a Multi-round Adaptive Stealthy Tampering framework designed to exploit communication vulnerabilities within the system. MAST integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search with Direct Preference Optimization to train an attack policy model that adaptively generates effective multi-round tampering strategies. Furthermore, to preserve stealthiness, we impose dual semantic and embedding similarity constraints during the tampering process. Comprehensive experiments across diverse tasks, communication architectures, and LLMs demonstrate that MAST consistently achieves high attack success rates while significantly enhancing stealthiness compared to baselines. These findings highlight the effectiveness, stealthiness, and adaptability of MAST, underscoring the need for robust communication safeguards in LLM-MAS.

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Query-Routed Activation Editing with Truth-hierarchical Preference Optimization

  • Kewei Liao
  • Tianbo Wang
  • Yuqing Ma
  • Zhange Zhang
  • Zhicheng Geng
  • Xiaowei Zhao
  • Jiakai Wang
  • Xianglong Liu

Hallucination has emerged as a pivotal challenge of Large Language Models (LLMs) that generate plausible yet non‑factual content, significantly impeding the trustworthy AI applications in real-world scenarios like medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. Editing the internal activations of LLMs during inference has shown promising effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations with minimal cost. However, previous editing approaches neglect the query‑specific inference pathways that require tailored truthful steering vectors, resulting in suboptimal hallucination mitigation. To address these issues, we propose the Query-Routed Activation Editing (QRAE) framework, which comprises Divergence-sensitive Head Routing (DHR) and Truth-hierarchical Preference Steering (TPS), to fully leverage query-specific semantics for adaptive activation editing. Specifically, DHR is proposed to establish a query-aware head selection criterion, thereby dynamically routing to truth-critical attention heads. Subsequently, TPS introduces a query-specific steering vector calibration policy with the guidance of progressive truth-preferred optimization, enabling precise and adaptive editing for each distinct query. Extensive experiments on the widely recognized TruthfulQA benchmark demonstrate that QRAE outperforms SOTA methods by up to 13.2% in MC1. Meanwhile, QRAE demonstrates strong generalization to out-of-distribution TriviaQA and Natural Questions benchmarks.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Conflict-Aware Knowledge Editing in the Wild: Semantic-Augmented Graph Representation for Unstructured Text

  • Zhange Zhang
  • Zhicheng Geng
  • Yuqing Ma
  • Tianbo Wang
  • Kai Lv
  • Xianglong Liu

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated broad applications but suffer from issues like hallucinations, erroneous outputs and outdated knowledge. Model editing emerges as an effective solution to refine knowledge in LLMs, yet existing methods typically depend on structured knowledge representations. However, real-world knowledge is primarily embedded within complex, unstructured text. Existing structured knowledge editing approaches face significant challenges when handling the entangled and intricate knowledge present in unstructured text, resulting in issues such as representation ambiguity and editing conflicts. To address these challenges, we propose a Conflict-Aware Knowledge Editing in the Wild (CAKE) framework, the first framework explicitly designed for editing knowledge extracted from wild unstructured text. CAKE comprises two core components: a Semantic-augmented Graph Representation module and a Conflict-aware Knowledge Editing strategy. The Semantic-augmented Graph Representation module enhances knowledge encoding through structural disambiguation, relational enrichment, and semantic diversification. Meanwhile, the Conflict-aware Knowledge Editing strategy utilizes a graph-theoretic coloring algorithm to disentangle conflicted edits by allocating them to orthogonal parameter subspaces, thereby effectively mitigating editing conflicts. Experimental results on the AKEW benchmark demonstrate that CAKE significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving a 15. 43\% improvement in accuracy on llama3 editing tasks. Our framework successfully bridges the gap between unstructured textual knowledge and reliable model editing, enabling more robust and scalable updates for practical LLM applications.

v2026.09.13