Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Thomas Schneider 0002

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

2

TIME Conference 2009 Conference Paper

Model Checking CTL is Almost Always Inherently Sequential

  • Olaf Beyersdorff
  • Arne Meier
  • Michael Thomas 0001
  • Heribert Vollmer
  • Martin Mundhenk
  • Thomas Schneider 0002

The model checking problem for CTL is known to be P-complete (Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla (1986), see Schnoebelen (2002)). We consider fragments of CTL obtained by restricting the use of temporal modalities or the use of negations---restrictions already studied for LTL by Sistla and Clarke (1985) and Markey (2004). For all these fragments, except for the trivial case without any temporal operator, we systematically prove model checking to be either inherently sequential (P-complete) or very efficiently parallelizable (LOGCFL-complete). For most fragments, however, model checking for CTL is already P-complete. Hence our results indicate that in most applications, approaching CTL model checking by parallelism will not result in the desired speed up. We also completely determine the complexity of the model checking problem for all fragments of the extensions ECTL, CTL+, and ECTL+.

MFCS Conference 2009 Conference Paper

The Complexity of Satisfiability for Fragments of Hybrid Logic-Part I

  • Arne Meier
  • Martin Mundhenk
  • Thomas Schneider 0002
  • Michael Thomas 0001
  • Volker Weber
  • Felix Weiss

Abstract The satisfiability problem of hybrid logics with the downarrow binder is known to be undecidable. This initiated a research program on decidable and tractable fragments. In this paper, we investigate the effect of restricting the propositional part of the language on decidability and on the complexity of the satisfiability problem over arbitrary, transitive, total frames, and frames based on equivalence relations. We also consider different sets of modal and hybrid operators. We trace the border of decidability and give the precise complexity of most fragments, in particular for all fragments including negation. For the monotone fragments, we are able to distinguish the easy from the hard cases, depending on the allowed set of operators.

v2026.09.13