Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Thierry Chaminade

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

5

YNIMG Journal 2020 Journal Article

Inter-subject pattern analysis: A straightforward and powerful scheme for group-level MVPA

  • Qi Wang
  • Bastien Cagna
  • Thierry Chaminade
  • Sylvain Takerkart

Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) has become vastly popular for analyzing functional neuroimaging data. At the group level, two main strategies are used in the literature. The standard one is hierarchical, combining the outcomes of within-subject decoding results in a second-level analysis. The alternative one, inter-subject pattern analysis, directly works at the group-level by using, e. g. a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. This study provides a thorough comparison of these two group-level decoding schemes, using both a large number of artificial datasets where the size of the multivariate effect and the amount of inter-individual variability are parametrically controlled, as well as two real fMRI datasets comprising 15 and 39 subjects, respectively. We show that these two strategies uncover distinct significant regions with partial overlap, and that inter-subject pattern analysis is able to detect smaller effects and to facilitate the interpretation. The core source code and data are openly available, allowing to fully reproduce most of these results.

YNICL Journal 2020 Journal Article

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is associated with altered reward mechanisms during the anticipation and the outcome of monetary incentive cues

  • Sarah Boukezzi
  • Christelle Baunez
  • Pierre-François Rousseau
  • Delphine Warrot
  • Catarina Silva
  • Valérie Guyon
  • Xavier Zendjidjian
  • Florian Nicolas

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) might be associated with dysfunctional reward circuitry. However, further research is needed to understand the key role of the reward system in PTSD symptomatology. METHODS: Twenty participants with PTSD and 21 Trauma-Exposed matched Controls (TECs) completed the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task during an MRI session. Reaction times (RTs) and hit rates were recorded. Brain activity was investigated during the anticipation and the outcome of monetary gains and losses. RESULTS: During the anticipation of monetary loss, PTSD participants had higher RTs than TECs. However, the groups did not differ at the neurofunctional level. During successful avoidance of monetary loss, PTSD patients showed higher activation than TECs in the left caudate nucleus. During the anticipation of monetary gains, no differences in RTs were found between groups. PTSD patients had specific activations in the right amygdala, nucleus accumbens, putamen, and middle frontal gyrus (p < 0.05 family-wise error (FWE)-corrected), while TECs had specific activation in the anterior cingulate cortex. When obtaining monetary gains, PTSD patients had specific activation in the caudate nucleus, while TECs had specific activations in the right hypothalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and left inferior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSION: For the first time, functional brain activation during both the anticipation and the outcome of monetary rewards is reported altered in PTSD patients. These alterations might be associated with the complex symptomatology of PTSD.

YNIMG Journal 2018 Journal Article

Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance

  • Virginia Aglieri
  • Thierry Chaminade
  • Sylvain Takerkart
  • Pascal Belin

Recognizing who is speaking is a cognitive ability characterized by considerable individual differences, which could relate to the inter-individual variability observed in voice-elicited BOLD activity. Since voice perception is sustained by a complex brain network involving temporal voice areas (TVAs) and, even if less consistently, extra-temporal regions such as frontal cortices, functional connectivity (FC) during an fMRI voice localizer (passive listening of voices vs non-voices) has been computed within twelve temporal and frontal voice-sensitive regions (“voice patches”) individually defined for each subject (N = 90) to account for inter-individual variability. Results revealed that voice patches were positively co-activated during voice listening and that they were characterized by different FC pattern depending on the location (anterior/posterior) and the hemisphere. Importantly, FC between right frontal and temporal voice patches was behaviorally relevant: FC significantly increased with voice recognition abilities as measured in a voice recognition test performed outside the scanner. Hence, this study highlights the importance of frontal regions in voice perception and it supports the idea that looking at FC between stimulus-specific and higher-order frontal regions can help understanding individual differences in processing social stimuli such as voices.