Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Taylor Raines

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

JAAMAS Journal 2026 Journal Article

Automated Assistants for Analyzing Team Behaviors

  • Ranjit Nair
  • Milind Tambe
  • Taylor Raines

Abstract Multi-agent teamwork is critical in a large number of agent applications, including training, education, virtual enterprises and collective robotics. The complex interactions of agents in a team as well as with other agents make it extremely difficult for human developers to understand and analyze agent-team behavior. It has thus become increasingly important to develop tools that can help humans analyze, evaluate, and understand team behaviors. However, the problem of automated team analysis is largely unaddressed in previous work. In this article, we identify several key constraints faced by team analysts. Most fundamentally, multiple types of models of team behavior are necessary to analyze different granularities of team events, including agent actions, interactions, and global performance. In addition, effective ways of presenting the analysis to humans is critical and the presentation techniques depend on the model being presented. Finally, analysis should be independent of underlying team architecture and implementation. We also demonstrate an approach to addressing these constraints by building an automated team analyst called ISAAC for post-hoc, off-line agent-team analysis. ISAAC acquires multiple, heterogeneous team models via machine learning over teams' external behavior traces, where the specific learning techniques are tailored to the particular model learned. Additionally, ISAAC employs multiple presentation techniques that can aid human understanding of the analyses. ISAAC also provides feedback on team improvement in two novel ways: (i) It supports principled “what-if” reasoning about possible agent improvements; (ii) It allows the user to compare different teams based on their patterns of interactions. This paper presents ISAAC's general conceptual framework, motivating its design, as well as its concrete application in two domains: (i) RoboCup Soccer; (ii) software agent teams participating in a simulated evacuation scenario. In the RoboCup domain, ISAAC was used prior to and during the RoboCup '99 tournament, and was awarded the RoboCup Scientific Challenge Award. In the evacuation domain, ISAAC was used to analyze patterns of message exchanges among software agents, illustrating the generality of ISAAC's techniques. We present detailed algorithms and experimental results from ISAAC's application.

AAAI Conference 1999 Conference Paper

Automated Team Analysis

  • Taylor Raines
  • Milind Tambe
  • Stacy Marsella
  • University of Southern California

We have created an agent for analyzing and improving synthetic teams. The agent is built in a bottom-up fashion using little specific domain knowledge. In lieu of extensive domain knowledge, data mining and inductive learning techniques are used in an attempt to isolate the key issues determining the successes or failures of these teams. This approach has been applied to the RoboCup domain, with a current focus on analyzing shots on goal and with future plans for assists, passing, and general teamwork.

IJCAI Conference 1999 Conference Paper

Two Fielded Teams and Two Experts: A RoboCup Challenge Response from the Trenches

  • Milind Tambe
  • Gal A. Kaminka
  • Stacy Marsella
  • Ion Muslea
  • Taylor Raines

The RoboCup (robot world-cup soccer) effort, initiated to stimulate research in multi-agents and robotics, has blossomed into a significant effort of international proportions. RoboCup is simultaneously a fundamental research effort and a set of competitions for testing research ideas. At IJ- CAI'97, a broad research challenge was issued for the RoboCup synthetic agents, covering areas of multi-agent learning, teamwork and agent modeling. This paper outlines our attack on the entire breadth of the RoboCup research challenge, on all of its categories, in the form of two fielded, contrasting RoboCup teams, and two off-line soccer analysis agents. We compare the teams and the agents to generalize the lessons learned in learning, teamwork and agent modeling.