Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Subha Maity

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

10 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

10

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

How does overparametrization affect performance on minority groups?

  • Saptarshi Roy
  • Subha Maity
  • Songkai Xue
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Yuekai Sun

The benefits of overparameterization for the overall performance of modern machine learning (ML) models are well known. However, the effect of overparameterization at a more granular level of data subgroups is less understood. Recent empirical studies demonstrate encouraging results: (i) when groups are not known, overparameterized models trained with empirical risk minimization (ERM) perform better on minority groups; (ii) when groups are known, ERM on data subsampled to equalize group sizes yields state-of-the-art worst-group accuracy in the overparameterized regime. In this paper, we complement these empirical studies with a theoretical investigation of the risk of overparameterized random feature regression models on minority groups with identical feature distribution as the majority group. In a setting in which the regression functions for the majority and minority groups are different, we show that overparameterization either improves or does not harm the asymptotic minority group performance under the ERM setting when the features are distributed uniformly over the sphere.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

An Investigation of Representation and Allocation Harms in Contrastive Learning

  • Subha Maity
  • Mayank Agarwal
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Yuekai Sun

The effect of underrepresentation on the performance of minority groups is known to be a serious problem in supervised learning settings; however, it has been underexplored so far in the context of self-supervised learning (SSL). In this paper, we demonstrate that contrastive learning (CL), a popular variant of SSL, tends to collapse representations of minority groups with certain majority groups. We refer to this phenomenon as representation harm and demonstrate it on image and text datasets using the corresponding popular CL methods. Furthermore, our causal mediation analysis of allocation harm on a downstream classification task reveals that representation harm is partly responsible for it, thus emphasizing the importance of studying and mitigating representation harm. Finally, we provide a theoretical explanation for representation harm using a stochastic block model that leads to a representational neural collapse in a contrastive learning setting.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Weak Supervision Performance Evaluation via Partial Identification

  • Felipe Maia Polo
  • Subha Maity
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Moulinath Banerjee
  • Yuekai Sun

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) enables supervised model training without direct access to ground truth labels, utilizing weak labels from heuristics, crowdsourcing, or pre-trained models. However, the absence of ground truth complicates model evaluation, as traditional metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall cannot be directly calculated. In this work, we present a novel method to address this challenge by framing model evaluation as a partial identification problem and estimating performance bounds using Fréchet bounds. Our approach derives reliable bounds on key metrics without requiring labeled data, overcoming core limitations in current weak supervision evaluation techniques. Through scalable convex optimization, we obtain accurate and computationally efficient bounds for metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, even in high-dimensional settings. This framework offers a robust approach to assessing model quality without ground truth labels, enhancing the practicality of weakly supervised learning for real-world applications.

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Predictor-corrector algorithms for stochastic optimization under gradual distribution shift

  • Subha Maity
  • Debarghya Mukherjee
  • Moulinath Banerjee
  • Yuekai Sun

Time-varying stochastic optimization problems frequently arise in machine learning practice (e.g., gradual domain shift, object tracking, strategic classification). Often, the underlying process that drives the distribution shift is continuous in nature. We exploit this underlying continuity by developing predictor-corrector algorithms for time-varying stochastic optimization that anticipates changes in the underlying data generating process through a predictor-corrector term in the update rule. The key challenge is the estimation of the predictor-corrector term; a naive approach based on sample-average approximation may lead to non-convergence. We develop a general moving-average based method to estimate the predictor-corrector term and provide error bounds for the iterates, both in presence of pure and noisy access to the queries from the relevant derivatives of the loss function. Furthermore, we show (theoretically and empirically in several examples) that our method outperforms non-predictor corrector methods that do not anticipate changes in the data generating process.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Simple Disentanglement of Style and Content in Visual Representations

  • Lilian Ngweta
  • Subha Maity
  • Alex Gittens
  • Yuekai Sun
  • Mikhail Yurochkin

Learning visual representations with interpretable features, i. e. , disentangled representations, remains a challenging problem. Existing methods demonstrate some success but are hard to apply to large-scale vision datasets like ImageNet. In this work, we propose a simple post-processing framework to disentangle content and style in learned representations from pre-trained vision models. We model the pre-trained features probabilistically as linearly entangled combinations of the latent content and style factors and develop a simple disentanglement algorithm based on the probabilistic model. We show that the method provably disentangles content and style features and verify its efficacy empirically. Our post-processed features yield significant domain generalization performance improvements when the distribution shift occurs due to style changes or style-related spurious correlations.

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Understanding new tasks through the lens of training data via exponential tilting

  • Subha Maity
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Moulinath Banerjee
  • Yuekai Sun

Deploying machine learning models on new tasks is a major challenge due to differences in distributions of the train (source) data and the new (target) data. However, the training data likely captures some of the properties of the new task. We consider the problem of reweighing the training samples to gain insights into the distribution of the target task. Specifically, we formulate a distribution shift model based on the exponential tilt assumption and learn train data importance weights minimizing the KL divergence between labeled train and unlabeled target datasets. The learned train data weights can then be used for downstream tasks such as target performance evaluation, fine-tuning, and model selection. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method on Waterbirds and Breeds benchmarks.

JMLR Journal 2022 Journal Article

Meta-analysis of heterogeneous data: integrative sparse regression in high-dimensions

  • Subha Maity
  • Yuekai Sun
  • Moulinath Banerjee

We consider the task of meta-analysis in high-dimensional settings in which the data sources are similar but non-identical. To borrow strength across such heterogeneous datasets, we introduce a global parameter that emphasizes interpretability and statistical efficiency in the presence of heterogeneity. We also propose a one-shot estimator of the global parameter that preserves the anonymity of the data sources and converges at a rate that depends on the size of the combined dataset. For high-dimensional linear model settings, we demonstrate the superiority of our identification restrictions in adapting to a previously seen data distribution as well as predicting for a new/unseen data distribution. Finally, we demonstrate the benefits of our approach on a large-scale drug treatment dataset involving several different cancer cell-lines. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] [ code ] &copy JMLR 2022. ( edit, beta )

JMLR Journal 2022 Journal Article

Minimax optimal approaches to the label shift problem in non-parametric settings

  • Subha Maity
  • Yuekai Sun
  • Moulinath Banerjee

We study the minimax rates of the label shift problem in non-parametric classification. In addition to the unsupervised setting in which the learner only has access to unlabeled examples from the target domain, we also consider the setting in which a small number of labeled examples from the target domain is available to the learner. Our study reveals a difference in the difficulty of the label shift problem in the two settings, and we attribute this difference to the availability of data from the target domain to estimate the class conditional distributions in the latter setting. We also show that a class proportion estimation approach is minimax rate-optimal in the unsupervised setting. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2022. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Does enforcing fairness mitigate biases caused by subpopulation shift?

  • Subha Maity
  • Debarghya Mukherjee
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Yuekai Sun

Many instances of algorithmic bias are caused by subpopulation shifts. For example, ML models often perform worse on demographic groups that are underrepresented in the training data. In this paper, we study whether enforcing algorithmic fairness during training improves the performance of the trained model in the \emph{target domain}. On one hand, we conceive scenarios in which enforcing fairness does not improve performance in the target domain. In fact, it may even harm performance. On the other hand, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions under which enforcing algorithmic fairness leads to the Bayes model in the target domain. We also illustrate the practical implications of our theoretical results in simulations and on real data.

ICLR Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Statistical inference for individual fairness

  • Subha Maity
  • Songkai Xue
  • Mikhail Yurochkin
  • Yuekai Sun

As we rely on machine learning (ML) models to make more consequential decisions, the issue of ML models perpetuating unwanted social biases has come to the fore of the public's and the research community's attention. In this paper, we focus on the problem of detecting violations of individual fairness in ML models. We formalize the problem as measuring the susceptibility of ML models against a form of adversarial attack and develop a suite of inference tools for the adversarial loss. The tools allow practitioners to assess the individual fairness of ML models in a statistically-principled way: form confidence intervals for the adversarial loss and test hypotheses of model fairness with (asymptotic) non-coverage/Type I error rate control. We demonstrate the utility of our tools in a real-world case study.

v2026.09.13