Author name cluster

Stefan Neubert

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers

2 author rows

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Cost-Free Neutrality for the River Method

Michelle Döring
Jannes Malanowski
Stefan Neubert

Recently, the River Method was introduced as novel refinement of the Split Cycle voting rule. The decision-making process of River is closely related to the well established Ranked Pairs Method. Both methods consider a margin graph computed from the voters' preferences and eliminate majority cycles in that graph to choose a winner. As ties can occur in the margin graph, a tiebreaker is required along with the preferences. While such a tiebreaker makes the computation efficient, it compromises the fundamental property of neutrality: the voting rule should not favor alternatives in advance. One way to reintroduce neutrality is to use Parallel-Universe Tiebreaking (PUT), where each alternative is a winner if it wins according to any possible tiebreaker. Unfortunately, computing the winners selected by Ranked Pairs with PUT is NP-complete. Given the similarity of River to Ranked Pairs, one might expect River to suffer from the same complexity. Surprisingly, we show the opposite: We present a polynomial-time algorithm for computing River winners with PUT, highlighting significant structural advantages of River over Ranked Pairs. Our Fused-Universe (FUN) algorithm simulates River for every possible tiebreaking in one pass. From the resulting FUN diagram one can then directly read off both the set of winners and, for each winner, a certificate that explains how this alternative dominates the others.

PDF Details DOI

AAMAS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Emit As You Go: Enumerating Edges of a Spanning Tree

Katrin Casel
Stefan Neubert

Classically, planning tasks are studied as a two-step process: plan creation and plan execution. In situations where plan creation is slow (for example, due to expensive information access or complex constraints), a natural speed-up tactic is interleaving planning and execution. We implement such an approach with an enumeration algorithm that, after little preprocessing time, outputs parts of a plan one by one with little delay in-between consecutive outputs. As concrete planning task, we consider efficient connectivity in a network formalized as the minimum spanning tree problem in all four standard variants: (un)weighted (un)directed graphs. Solution parts to be emitted one by one for this concrete task are the individual edges that form the final tree. We show with algorithmic upper bounds and matching unconditional adversary lower bounds that efficient enumeration is possible for three of four problem variants; specifically for undirected unweighted graphs (delay in the order of the average degree), as well as graphs with either weights (delay in the order of the maximum degree and the average runtime per emitted edge of a total-time algorithm) or directions (delay in the order of the maximum degree). For graphs with both weighted and directed edges, we show that no meaningful enumeration is possible. Finally, with experiments on random undirected unweighted graphs, we show that the theoretical advantage of little preprocessing and delay carries over to practice.

PDF

ICAPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Incremental Ordering for Scheduling Problems

Stefan Neubert
Katrin Casel

Given an instance of a scheduling problem where we want to start executing jobs as soon as possible, it is advantageous if a scheduling algorithm emits the first parts of its solution early, in particular before the algorithm completes its work. Therefore, in this position paper, we analyze core scheduling problems in regards to their enumeration complexity, i. e. the computation time to the first emitted schedule entry (preprocessing time) and the worst case time between two consecutive parts of the solution (delay). Specifically, we look at scheduling instances that reduce to ordering problems. We apply a known incremental sorting algorithm for scheduling strategies that are at their core comparison-based sorting algorithms and translate corresponding upper and lower complexity bounds to the scheduling setting. For instances with n jobs and a precedence DAG with maximum degree Δ, we incrementally build a topological ordering with O(n) preprocessing and O(Δ) delay. We prove a matching lower bound and show with an adversary argument that the delay lower bound holds even in case the DAG has constant average degree and the ordering is emitted out-of-order in the form of insert operations. We complement our theoretical results with experiments that highlight the improved time-to-first-output and discuss research opportunities for similar incremental approaches for other scheduling problems.

Details