SODA Conference 2025 Conference Paper
Facet-Hamiltonicity
- Hugo A. Akitaya
- Jean Cardinal
- Stefan Felsner
- Linda Kleist
- Robert Lauff
Author name cluster
Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.
SODA Conference 2025 Conference Paper
SODA Conference 2024 Conference Paper
TCS Journal 2022 Journal Article
MFCS Conference 2021 Conference Paper
We study reconfiguration of independent sets in interval graphs under the token sliding rule. We show that if two independent sets of size k are reconfigurable in an n-vertex interval graph, then there is a reconfiguration sequence of length 𝒪(k⋅ n²). We also provide a construction in which the shortest reconfiguration sequence is of length Ω(k²⋅ n). As a counterpart to these results, we also establish that Independent Set Reconfiguration is PSPACE-hard on incomparability graphs, of which interval graphs are a special case.
SODA Conference 2020 Conference Paper
MFCS Conference 2013 Conference Paper
Abstract Orthogonal ray graphs are the intersection graphs of horizontal and vertical rays (i. e. half-lines) in the plane. If the rays can have any possible orientation (left/right/up/down) then the graph is a 4 -directional orthogonal ray graph (4-DORG). Otherwise, if all rays are only pointing into the positive x and y directions, the intersection graph is a 2-DORG. Similarly, for 3-DORGs, the horizontal rays can have any direction but the vertical ones can only have the positive direction. The recognition problem of 2-DORGs, which are a nice subclass of bipartite comparability graphs, is known to be polynomial, while the recognition problems for 3-DORGs and 4-DORGs are open. Recently it has been shown that the recognition of unit grid intersection graphs, a superclass of 4-DORGs, is NP-complete. In this paper we prove that the recognition problem of 4-DORGs is polynomial, given a partition { L, R, U, D } of the vertices of G (which corresponds to the four possible ray directions). For the proof, given the graph G, we first construct two cliques G 1, G 2 with both directed and undirected edges. Then we successively augment these two graphs, constructing eventually a graph \(\widetilde{G}\) with both directed and undirected edges, such that G has a 4-DORG representation if and only if \(\widetilde{G}\) has a transitive orientation respecting its directed edges. As a crucial tool for our analysis we introduce the notion of an S-orientation of a graph, which extends the notion of a transitive orientation. We expect that our proof ideas will be useful also in other situations. Using an independent approach we show that, given a permutation π of the vertices of U ( π is the order of y -coordinates of ray endpoints for U ), while the partition { L, R } of V ∖ U is not given, we can still efficiently check whether G has a 3-DORG representation.
SODA Conference 2000 Conference Paper
SODA Conference 1997 Conference Paper
STOC Conference 1993 Conference Paper