Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Siheng Li

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

6 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

6

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

A Survey on the Honesty of Large Language Models

  • Siheng Li
  • Cheng Yang
  • Taiqiang Wu
  • Chufan Shi
  • Yuji Zhang
  • Xinyu Zhu
  • Zesen Cheng
  • Deng Cai

Honesty is a fundamental principle for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values, requiring these models to recognize what they know and don't know and be able to faithfully express their knowledge. Despite promising, current LLMs still exhibit significant dishonest behaviors, such as confidently presenting wrong answers or failing to express what they know. In addition, research on the honesty of LLMs also faces challenges, including varying definitions of honesty, difficulties in distinguishing between known and unknown knowledge, and a lack of comprehensive understanding of related research. To address these issues, we provide a survey on the honesty of LLMs, covering its clarification, evaluation approaches, and strategies for improvement. Moreover, we offer insights for future research, aiming to inspire further exploration in this important area.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation

  • Cheng Yang 0002
  • Chufan Shi
  • Yaxin Liu
  • Bo Shui
  • Junjie Wang 0011
  • Mohan Jing
  • Linran Xu
  • Xinyu Zhu

We introduce a new benchmark, ChartMimic, aimed at assessing the visually-grounded code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). ChartMimic utilizes information-intensive visual charts and textual instructions as inputs, requiring LMMs to generate the corresponding code for chart rendering. ChartMimic includes $4,800$ human-curated (figure, instruction, code) triplets, which represent the authentic chart use cases found in scientific papers across various domains (e.g., Physics, Computer Science, Economics, etc). These charts span $18$ regular types and $4$ advanced types, diversifying into $201$ subcategories. Furthermore, we propose multi-level evaluation metrics to provide an automatic and thorough assessment of the output code and the rendered charts. Unlike existing code generation benchmarks, ChartMimic places emphasis on evaluating LMMs' capacity to harmonize a blend of cognitive capabilities, encompassing visual understanding, code generation, and cross-modal reasoning. The evaluation of $3$ proprietary models and $14$ open-weight models highlights the substantial challenges posed by ChartMimic. Even the advanced GPT-4o, InternVL2-Llama3-76B only achieved an average score across Direct Mimic and Customized Mimic tasks of $82.2$ and $61.6$, respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We anticipate that ChartMimic will inspire the development of LMMs, advancing the pursuit of artificial general intelligence.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability

  • Zicheng Lin
  • Tian Liang
  • Jiahao Xu
  • Qiuzhi Liu
  • Xing Wang 0007
  • Ruilin Luo
  • Chufan Shi
  • Siheng Li

Mathematical reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (LLMs) because they require precise logical deduction and sequence analysis. In this work, we introduce the concept of critical tokens – elements within reasoning trajectories that significantly influence incorrect outcomes. We present a novel framework for identifying these tokens through rollout sampling and demonstrate their substantial divergence from traditional error tokens. Through extensive experiments on datasets such as GSM8K and MATH500, we show that identifying and replacing critical tokens significantly improves model accuracy. We propose an efficient methodology for pinpointing these tokens in large-scale datasets using contrastive estimation and extend this framework to enhance model training processes with direct preference optimization (DPO). Experimental results on GSM8K and MATH500 benchmarks with the widely used models Llama-3 (8B and 70B) and Deepseek-math (7B) demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, cDPO. Our results underscore the potential of leveraging critical tokens to reduce errors in reasoning tasks, advancing the development of AI systems capable of robust logical deduction.

AAAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Parallel Vertex Diffusion for Unified Visual Grounding

  • Zesen Cheng
  • Kehan Li
  • Peng Jin
  • Siheng Li
  • Xiangyang Ji
  • Li Yuan
  • Chang Liu
  • Jie Chen

Unified visual grounding (UVG) capitalizes on a wealth of task-related knowledge across various grounding tasks via one-shot training, which curtails retraining costs and task-specific architecture design efforts. Vertex generation-based UVG methods achieve this versatility by unified modeling object box and contour prediction and provide a text-powered interface to vast related multi-modal tasks, e.g., visual question answering and captioning. However, these methods typically generate vertexes sequentially through autoregression, which is prone to be trapped in error accumulation and heavy computation, especially for high-dimension sequence generation in complex scenarios. In this paper, we develop Parallel Vertex Diffusion (PVD) based on the parallelizability of diffusion models to accurately and efficiently generate vertexes in a parallel and scalable manner. Since the coordinates fluctuate greatly, it typically encounters slow convergence when training diffusion models without geometry constraints. Therefore, we consummate our PVD by two critical components, i.e., center anchor mechanism and angle summation loss, which serve to normalize coordinates and adopt a differentiable geometry descriptor from the point-in-polygon problem of computational geometry to constrain the overall difference of prediction and label vertexes. These innovative designs empower our PVD to demonstrate its superiority with state-of-the-art performance across various grounding tasks.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Unchosen Experts Can Contribute Too: Unleashing MoE Models’ Power by Self-Contrast

  • Chufan Shi
  • Cheng Yang
  • Xinyu Zhu
  • Jiahao Wang
  • Taiqiang Wu
  • Siheng Li
  • Deng Cai
  • Yujiu Yang

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has emerged as a prominent architecture for scaling model size while maintaining computational efficiency. In MoE, each token in the input sequence activates a different subset of experts determined by a routing mechanism. However, the unchosen experts in MoE models do not contribute to the output, potentially leading to underutilization of the model's capacity. In this work, we first conduct exploratory studies to demonstrate that increasing the number of activated experts does not necessarily improve and can even degrade the output quality. Then, we show that output distributions from an MoE model using different routing strategies substantially differ, indicating that different experts do not always act synergistically. Motivated by these findings, we propose S elf- C ontrast M ixture- o f- E xperts (SCMoE), a training-free strategy that utilizes unchosen experts in a self-contrast manner during inference. In SCMoE, the next-token probabilities are determined by contrasting the outputs from strong and weak activation using the same MoE model. Our method is conceptually simple and computationally lightweight, as it incurs minimal latency compared to greedy decoding. Experiments on several benchmarks (GSM8K, StrategyQA, MBPP and HumanEval) demonstrate that SCMoE can consistently enhance Mixtral 8x7B’s reasoning capability across various domains. For example, it improves the accuracy on GSM8K from 61. 79 to 66. 94. Moreover, combining SCMoE with self-consistency yields additional gains, increasing major@20 accuracy from 75. 59 to 78. 31.

IJCAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

WiCo: Win-win Cooperation of Bottom-up and Top-down Referring Image Segmentation

  • Zesen Cheng
  • Peng Jin
  • Hao Li
  • Kehan Li
  • Siheng Li
  • Xiangyang Ji
  • Chang Liu
  • Jie Chen

The top-down and bottom-up methods are two mainstreams of referring segmentation, while both methods have their own intrinsic weaknesses. Top-down methods are chiefly disturbed by Polar Negative (PN) errors owing to the lack of fine-grained cross-modal alignment. Bottom-up methods are mainly perturbed by Inferior Positive (IP) errors due to the lack of prior object information. Nevertheless, we discover that two types of methods are highly complementary for restraining respective weaknesses but the direct average combination leads to harmful interference. In this context, we build Win-win Cooperation (WiCo) to exploit complementary nature of two types of methods on both interaction and integration aspects for achieving a win-win improvement. For the interaction aspect, Complementary Feature Interaction (CFI) introduces prior object information to bottom-up branch and provides fine-grained information to top-down branch for complementary feature enhancement. For the integration aspect, Gaussian Scoring Integration (GSI) models the gaussian performance distributions of two branches and weighted integrates results by sampling confident scores from the distributions. With our WiCo, several prominent bottom-up and top-down combinations achieve remarkable improvements on three common datasets with reasonable extra costs, which justifies effectiveness and generality of our method.

v2026.09.13