Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Sherry Sarkar

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Improved Algorithms for Fair Matroid Submodular Maximization

  • Sepideh Mahabadi
  • Sherry Sarkar
  • Jakub Tarnawski

Submodular maximization subject to matroid constraints is a central problem with many applications in machine learning. As algorithms are increasingly used in decision-making over datapoints with sensitive attributes such as gender or race, it is becoming crucial to enforce fairness to avoid bias and discrimination. Recent work has addressed the challenge of developing efficient approximation algorithms for fair matroid submodular maximization. However, the best algorithms known so far are only guaranteed to satisfy a relaxed version of the fairness constraints that loses a factor 2, i. e. , the problem may ask for $\ell$ elements with a given attribute, but the algorithm is only guaranteed to find $\lfloor \ell/2 \rfloor$. In particular, there is no provable guarantee when $\ell=1$, which corresponds to a key special case of perfect matching constraints. In this work, we achieve a new trade-off via an algorithm that gets arbitrarily close to full fairness. Namely, for any constant $\varepsilon>0$, we give a constant-factor approximation to fair monotone matroid submodular maximization that in expectation loses only a factor $(1-\varepsilon)$ in the lower-bound fairness constraint. Our empirical evaluation on a standard suite of real-world datasets -- including clustering, recommendation, and coverage tasks -- demonstrates the practical effectiveness of our methods.

FOCS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

The Online Submodular Assignment Problem

  • Daniel Hathcock
  • Billy Jin
  • Kalen Patton
  • Sherry Sarkar
  • Michael Zlatin

Online resource allocation is a rich and var-ied field. One of the most well-known problems in this area is online bipartite matching, introduced in 1990 by Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani. Since then, many variants have been studied, including AdWords, the generalized assignment problem (GAP), and online submodular welfare maximization. In this paper, we introduce a generalization of GAP which we call the submodular assignment problem (SAP). This generalization captures many online assignment problems, including all classical online bipartite matching problems as well as broader online combinatorial optimization problems such as online arboricity, flow scheduling, and laminar restricted allocations. We present a fractional algorithm for online SAP that is $(1-1/e)$ -competitive. Additionally, we study several integral special cases of the problem. In particular, we provide a $(1\ -1/e-\varepsilon){-}$ competitive integral algorithm under a small-bids assumption, and a $(1\ -1/e)$ -competitive integral algorithm for online submodular welfare maximization where the utility functions are given by rank functions of matroids. The key new ingredient for our results is the construction and structural analysis of a “water level” vector for polymatroids, which allows us to generalize the classic water-filling paradigm used in online matching problems. This construction reveals connections to submodular utility allocation markets and principal partition sequences of matroids.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

The Secretary Problem with Predicted Additive Gap

  • Alexander Braun
  • Sherry Sarkar

The secretary problem is one of the fundamental problems in online decision making; a tight competitive ratio for this problem of $1/e \approx 0. 368$ has been known since the 1960s. Much more recently, the study of algorithms with predictions was introduced: The algorithm is equipped with a (possibly erroneous) additional piece of information upfront which can be used to improve the algorithm's performance. Complementing previous work on secretary problems with prior knowledge, we tackle the following question: _What is the weakest piece of information that allows us to break the $1/e$ barrier? _To this end, we introduce the secretary problem with predicted additive gap. As in the classical problem, weights are fixed by an adversary and elements appear in random order. In contrast to previous variants of predictions, our algorithm only has access to a much weaker piece of information: an _additive gap_ $c$. This gap is the difference between the highest and $k$-th highest weight in the sequence. Unlike previous pieces of advice, knowing an exact additive gap does not make the problem trivial. Our contribution is twofold. First, we show that for any index $k$ and any gap $c$, we can obtain a competitive ratio of $0. 4$ when knowing the exact gap (even if we do not know $k$), hence beating the prevalent bound for the classical problem by a constant. Second, a slightly modified version of our algorithm allows to prove standard robustness-consistency properties as well as improved guarantees when knowing a range for the error of the prediction.