Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Serena Wang 0001

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

4

UAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Robust distillation for worst-class performance: on the interplay between teacher and student objectives

  • Serena Wang 0001
  • Harikrishna Narasimhan
  • Yichen Zhou
  • Sara Hooker
  • Michal Lukasik
  • Aditya Krishna Menon

Knowledge distillation is a popular technique that has been shown to produce remarkable gains in average accuracy. However, recent work has shown that these gains are not uniform across subgroups in the data, and can often come at the cost of accuracy on rare subgroups and classes. Robust optimization is a common remedy to improve worst-class accuracy in standard learning settings, but in distillation it is unknown whether it is best to apply robust objectives when training the teacher, the student, or both. This work studies the interplay between robust objectives for the teacher and student. Empirically, we show that that jointly modifying the teacher and student objectives can lead to better worst-class student performance and even Pareto improvement in the trade-off between worst-class and overall performance. Theoretically, we show that the per-class calibration of teacher scores is key when training a robust student. Both the theory and experiments support the surprising finding that applying a robust teacher training objective does not always yield a more robust student.

UAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Variational refinement for importance sampling using the forward Kullback-Leibler divergence

  • Ghassen Jerfel
  • Serena Wang 0001
  • Clara Wong-Fannjiang
  • Katherine A. Heller
  • Yian Ma
  • Michael I. Jordan

Variational Inference (VI) is a popular alternative to asymptotically exact sampling in Bayesian inference. Its main workhorse is optimization over a reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence (RKL), which typically underestimates the tail of the posterior leading to miscalibration and potential degeneracy. Importance sampling (IS), on the other hand, is often used to fine-tune and de-bias the estimates of approximate Bayesian inference procedures. The quality of IS crucially depends on the choice of the proposal distribution. Ideally, the proposal distribution has heavier tails than the target, which is rarely achievable by minimizing the RKL. We thus propose a novel combination of optimization and sampling techniques for approximate Bayesian inference by constructing an IS proposal distribution through the minimization of a forward KL (FKL) divergence. This approach guarantees asymptotic consistency and a fast convergence towards both the optimal IS estimator and the optimal variational approximation. We empirically demonstrate on real data that our method is competitive with variational boosting and MCMC.

ICML Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Shape Constraints for Set Functions

  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya R. Gupta
  • Heinrich Jiang
  • Erez Louidor
  • James Muller
  • Taman Narayan
  • Serena Wang 0001
  • Tao Zhu 0005

Set functions predict a label from a permutation-invariant variable-size collection of feature vectors. We propose making set functions more understandable and regularized by capturing domain knowledge through shape constraints. We show how prior work in monotonic constraints can be adapted to set functions, and then propose two new shape constraints designed to generalize the conditioning role of weights in a weighted mean. We show how one can train standard functions and set functions that satisfy these shape constraints with a deep lattice network. We propose a nonlinear estimation strategy we call the semantic feature engine that uses set functions with the proposed shape constraints to estimate labels for compound sparse categorical features. Experiments on real-world data show the achieved accuracy is similar to deep sets or deep neural networks, but provides guarantees on the model behavior, which makes it easier to explain and debug.

ICML Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraints

  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya R. Gupta
  • Heinrich Jiang
  • Nathan Srebro
  • Karthik Sridharan
  • Serena Wang 0001
  • Blake E. Woodworth
  • Seungil You

Classifiers can be trained with data-dependent constraints to satisfy fairness goals, reduce churn, achieve a targeted false positive rate, or other policy goals. We study the generalization performance for such constrained optimization problems, in terms of how well the constraints are satisfied at evaluation time, given that they are satisfied at training time. To improve generalization, we frame the problem as a two-player game where one player optimizes the model parameters on a training dataset, and the other player enforces the constraints on an independent validation dataset. We build on recent work in two-player constrained optimization to show that if one uses this two-dataset approach, then constraint generalization can be significantly improved. As we illustrate experimentally, this approach works not only in theory, but also in practice.

v2026.09.13