Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Runxin Xu

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

CodeIO: Condensing Reasoning Patterns via Code Input-Output Prediction

  • Junlong Li
  • Daya Guo
  • Dejian Yang
  • Runxin Xu
  • Yu Wu 0024
  • Junxian He

Reasoning is a fundamental capability of Large Language Models. While prior research predominantly focuses on enhancing narrow skills like math or code generation, improving performance on many other reasoning tasks remains challenging due to sparse and fragmented training data. To address this issue, we propose CodeI/O, a novel approach that systematically condenses diverse reasoning patterns inherently embedded in contextually-grounded codes, through transforming the original code into a code input-output prediction format. By training models to predict inputs/outputs given code and test cases entirely in natural language as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales, we expose them to universal reasoning primitives—like logic flow planning, state-space searching, decision tree traversal, and modular decomposition—while decoupling structured reasoning from code-specific syntax and preserving procedural rigor. Experimental results demonstrate CodeI/O leads to consistent improvements across symbolic, scientific, logic, math & numerical, and commonsense reasoning tasks. By matching the existing ground-truth outputs or re-executing the code with predicted inputs, we can verify each prediction and further enhance the CoTs through multi-turn revision, resulting in CodeI/O++ and achieving higher performance. Our data and models will be publicly available.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language Models

  • Bofei Gao
  • Feifan Song 0001
  • Zhe Yang 0013
  • Zefan Cai
  • Yibo Miao
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Lei Li 0039
  • Chenghao Ma

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54% and 52.55% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.

AAAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

From Dense to Sparse: Contrastive Pruning for Better Pre-trained Language Model Compression

  • Runxin Xu
  • Fuli Luo
  • Chengyu Wang
  • Baobao Chang
  • Jun Huang
  • Songfang Huang
  • Fei Huang

Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have achieved great success in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks under the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm. With large quantities of parameters, PLMs are computation-intensive and resource-hungry. Hence, model pruning has been introduced to compress large-scale PLMs. However, most prior approaches only consider task-specific knowledge towards downstream tasks, but ignore the essential task-agnostic knowledge during pruning, which may cause catastrophic forgetting problem and lead to poor generalization ability. To maintain both task-agnostic and task-specific knowledge in our pruned model, we propose ContrAstive Pruning (CAP) under the paradigm of pre-training and fine-tuning. It is designed as a general framework, compatible with both structured and unstructured pruning. Unified in contrastive learning, CAP enables the pruned model to learn from the pretrained model for task-agnostic knowledge, and fine-tuned model for task-specific knowledge. Besides, to better retain the performance of the pruned model, the snapshots (i. e. , the intermediate models at each pruning iteration) also serve as effective supervisions for pruning. Our extensive experiments show that adopting CAP consistently yields significant improvements, especially in extremely high sparsity scenarios. With only 3% model parameters reserved (i. e. , 97% sparsity), CAP successfully achieves 99. 2% and 96. 3% of the original BERT performance in QQP and MNLI tasks. In addition, our probing experiments demonstrate that the model pruned by CAP tends to achieve better generalization ability.

AAAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

ACMo: Angle-Calibrated Moment Methods for Stochastic Optimization

  • Xunpeng Huang
  • Runxin Xu
  • Hao Zhou
  • Zhe Wang
  • Zhengyang Liu
  • Lei Li

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is a widely used method for its outstanding generalization ability and simplicity. Adaptive gradient methods have been proposed to further accelerate the optimization process. In this paper, we revisit existing adaptive gradient optimization methods with a new interpretation. Such new perspective leads to a refreshed understanding of the roles of second moments in stochastic optimization. Based on this, we propose Angle-Calibration Moment method (ACMo), a novel stochastic optimization method. It enjoys the benefits of second moments with only first moment updates. Theoretical analysis shows that ACMo is able to achieve the same convergence rate as mainstream adaptive methods. Experiments on a variety of CV and NLP tasks demonstrate that ACMo has a comparable convergence to state-of-the-art Adam-type optimizers, and even a better generalization performance in most cases. The code is available at https: //github. com/Xunpeng746/ACMo.

v2026.09.13