Author name cluster

Roi Livni

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

25 papers

2 author rows

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

On Traceability in $\ell_p$ Stochastic Convex Optimization

Sasha Voitovych
Mahdi Haghifam
Idan Attias
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Roi Livni
Dan Roy

In this paper, we investigate the necessity of traceability for accurate learning in stochastic convex optimization (SCO) under $\ell_p$ geometries. Informally, we say a learning algorithm is \emph{$m$-traceable} if, by analyzing its output, it is possible to identify at least $m$ of its training samples. Our main results uncover a fundamental tradeoff between traceability and excess risk in SCO. For every $p\in [1, \infty)$, we establish the existence of an excess risk threshold below which every sample-efficient learner is traceable with the number of samples which is a \emph{constant fraction} of its training sample. For $p\in [1, 2]$, this threshold coincides with the best excess risk of differentially private (DP) algorithms, i. e. , above this threshold, there exist algorithms that are not traceable, which corresponds to a sharp phase transition. For $p \in (2, \infty)$, this threshold instead gives novel lower bounds for DP learning, partially closing an open problem in this setup. En route to establishing these results, we prove a sparse variant of the fingerprinting lemma, which is of independent interest to the community.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization

Shira Vansover-Hager
Tomer Koren
Roi Livni

We study the out-of-sample performance of multi-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in the fundamental stochastic convex optimization (SCO) model. While one-pass SGD is known to achieve an optimal $\Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$ excess population loss given a sample of size $n$, much less is understood about the multi-pass version of the algorithm which is widely used in practice. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that in the general non-smooth case of SCO, just a few epochs of SGD can already hurt its out-of-sample performance significantly and lead to overfitting. In particular, using a step size $\eta = \Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$, which gives the optimal rate after one pass, can lead to population loss as large as $\Omega(1)$ after just one additional pass. More generally, we show that the population loss from the second pass onward is of the order $\Theta(1/(\eta T) + \eta \sqrt{T})$, where $T$ is the total number of steps. These results reveal a certain phase-transition in the out-of-sample behavior of SGD after the first epoch, as well as a sharp separation between the rates of overfitting in the smooth and non-smooth cases of SCO. Additionally, we extend our results to with-replacement SGD, proving that the same asymptotic bounds hold after $O(n \log n)$ steps. Finally, we also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(\eta \sqrt{n})$ on the generalization gap of one-pass SGD in dimension $d = {\widetilde O}(n)$, improving on recent results of Koren et al. (2022) and Schliserman et al. (2024).

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Credit Attribution and Stable Compression

Roi Livni
Shay Moran
Kobbi Nissim
Chirag Pabbaraju

Credit attribution is crucial across various fields. In academic research, proper citation acknowledges prior work and establishes original contributions. Similarly, in generative models, such as those trained on existing artworks or music, it is important to ensure that any generated content influenced by these works appropriately credits the original creators. We study credit attribution by machine learning algorithms. We propose new definitions--relaxations of Differential Privacy--that weaken the stability guarantees for a designated subset of $k$ datapoints. These $k$ datapoints can be used non-stably with permission from their owners, potentially in exchange for compensation. Meanwhile, the remaining datapoints are guaranteed to have no significant influence on the algorithm's output. Our framework extends well-studied notions of stability, including Differential Privacy ($k = 0$), differentially private learning with public data (where the $k$ public datapoints are fixed in advance), and stable sample compression (where the $k$ datapoints are selected adaptively by the algorithm). We examine the expressive power of these stability notions within the PAC learning framework, provide a comprehensive characterization of learnability for algorithms adhering to these principles, and propose directions and questions for future research.

PDF Details DOI

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Information Complexity of Stochastic Convex Optimization: Applications to Generalization, Memorization, and Tracing

Idan Attias
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Mahdi Haghifam
Roi Livni
Daniel M. Roy 0001

In this work, we investigate the interplay between memorization and learning in the context of stochastic convex optimization (SCO). We define memorization via the information a learning algorithm reveals about its training data points. We then quantify this information using the framework of conditional mutual information (CMI) proposed by Steinke and Zakynthinou (2020). Our main result is a precise characterization of the tradeoff between the accuracy of a learning algorithm and its CMI, answering an open question posed by Livni (2023). We show that, in the $L^2$ Lipschitz–bounded setting and under strong convexity, every learner with an excess error $\epsilon$ has CMI bounded below by $\Omega(1/\epsilon^2)$ and $\Omega(1/\epsilon)$, respectively. We further demonstrate the essential role of memorization in learning problems in SCO by designing an adversary capable of accurately identifying a significant fraction of the training samples in specific SCO problems. Finally, we enumerate several implications of our results, such as a limitation of generalization bounds based on CMI and the incompressibility of samples in SCO problems.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization

Roi Livni

We analyze the sample complexity of full-batch Gradient Descent (GD) in the setup of non-smooth Stochastic Convex Optimization. We show that the generalization error of GD, with common choice of hyper-parameters, can be $\tilde \Theta(d/m+1/\sqrt{m})$, where d is the dimension and m is the sample size. This matches the sample complexity of \emph{worst-case} empirical risk minimizers. That means that, in contrast with other algorithms, GD has no advantage over naive ERMs. Our bound follows from a new generalization bound that depends on both the dimension as well as the learning rate and number of iterations. Our bound also shows that, for general hyper-parameters, when the dimension is strictly larger than number of samples, $T=\Omega(1/\epsilon^4)$ iterations are necessary to avoid overfitting. This resolves an open problem by Schlisserman et al. 23 and Amir er Al. 21, and improves over previous lower bounds that demonstrated that the sample size must be at least square root of the dimension.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Information Theoretic Lower Bounds for Information Theoretic Upper Bounds

Roi Livni

We examine the relationship between the mutual information between the output model and the empirical sample and the algorithm's generalization in the context of stochastic convex optimization. Despite increasing interest in information-theoretic generalization bounds, it is uncertain if these bounds can provide insight into the exceptional performance of various learning algorithms. Our study of stochastic convex optimization reveals that, for true risk minimization, dimension-dependent mutual information is necessary. This indicates that existing information-theoretic generalization bounds fall short in capturing the generalization capabilities of algorithms like SGD and regularized ERM, which have dimension-independent sample complexity.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Benign Underfitting of Stochastic Gradient Descent

Tomer Koren
Roi Livni
Yishay Mansour
Uri Sherman

We study to what extent may stochastic gradient descent (SGD) be understood as a ``conventional'' learning rule that achieves generalization performance by obtaining a good fit to training data. We consider the fundamental stochastic convex optimization framework, where (one pass, $\textit{without}$-replacement) SGD is classically known to minimize the population risk at rate $O(1/\sqrt n)$, and prove that, surprisingly, there exist problem instances where the SGD solution exhibits both empirical risk and generalization gap of $\Omega(1)$. Consequently, it turns out that SGD is not algorithmically stable in $\textit{any}$ sense, and its generalization ability cannot be explained by uniform convergence or any other currently known generalization bound technique for that matter (other than that of its classical analysis). We then continue to analyze the closely related $\textit{with}$-replacement SGD, for which we show that an analogous phenomenon does not occur and prove that its population risk does in fact converge at the optimal rate. Finally, we interpret our main results in the context of without-replacement SGD for finite-sum convex optimization problems, and derive upper and lower bounds for the multi-epoch regime that significantly improve upon previously known results.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Better Best of Both Worlds Bounds for Bandits with Switching Costs

Idan Amir
Guy Azov
Tomer Koren
Roi Livni

We study best-of-both-worlds algorithms for bandits with switching cost, recently addressed by Rouyer et al. , 2021. We introduce a surprisingly simple and effective algorithm that simultaneously achieves minimax optimal regret bound (up to logarithmic factors) of $\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3})$ in the oblivious adversarial setting and a bound of $\mathcal{O}(\min\{\log (T)/\Delta^2, T^{2/3}\})$ in the stochastically-constrained regime, both with (unit) switching costs, where $\Delta$ is the gap between the arms. In the stochastically constrained case, our bound improves over previous results due to Rouyer et al. , 2021, that achieved regret of $\mathcal{O}(T^{1/3}/\Delta)$. We accompany our results with a lower bound showing that, in general, $\tilde{\mathcal{\Omega}}(\min\{1/\Delta^2, T^{2/3}\})$ switching cost regret is unavoidable in the stochastically-constrained case for algorithms with $\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3})$ worst-case switching cost regret.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Thinking Outside the Ball: Optimal Learning with Gradient Descent for Generalized Linear Stochastic Convex Optimization

Idan Amir
Roi Livni
Nati Srebro

We consider linear prediction with a convex Lipschitz loss, or more generally, stochastic convex optimization problems of generalized linear form, i. e. ~where each instantaneous loss is a scalar convex function of a linear function. We show that in this setting, early stopped Gradient Descent (GD), without any explicit regularization or projection, ensures excess error at most $\varepsilon$ (compared to the best possible with unit Euclidean norm) with an optimal, up to logarithmic factors, sample complexity of $\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)$ and only $\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)$ iterations. This contrasts with general stochastic convex optimization, where $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^4)$ iterations are needed Amir et al. 2021. The lower iteration complexity is ensured by leveraging uniform convergence rather than stability. But instead of uniform convergence in a norm ball, which we show can guarantee suboptimal learning using $\Theta(1/\varepsilon^4)$ samples, we rely on uniform convergence in a distribution-dependent ball.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Littlestone Classes are Privately Online Learnable

Noah Golowich
Roi Livni

We consider the problem of online classification under a privacy constraint. In this setting a learner observes sequentially a stream of labelled examples $(x_t, y_t)$, for $1 \leq t \leq T$, and returns at each iteration $t$ a hypothesis $h_t$ which is used to predict the label of each new example $x_t$. The learner's performance is measured by her regret against a known hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$. We require that the algorithm satisfies the following privacy constraint: the sequence $h_1, \ldots, h_T$ of hypotheses output by the algorithm needs to be an $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differentially private function of the whole input sequence $(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_T, y_T)$. We provide the first non-trivial regret bound for the realizable setting. Specifically, we show that if the class $\mathcal{H}$ has constant Littlestone dimension then, given an oblivious sequence of labelled examples, there is a private learner that makes in expectation at most $O(\log T)$ mistakes -- comparable to the optimal mistake bound in the non-private case, up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, for general values of the Littlestone dimension $d$, the same mistake bound holds but with a doubly-exponential in $d$ factor. A recent line of work has demonstrated a strong connection between classes that are online learnable and those that are differentially-private learnable. Our results strengthen this connection and show that an online learning algorithm can in fact be directly privatized (in the realizable setting). We also discuss an adaptive setting and provide a sublinear regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T})$.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Never Go Full Batch (in Stochastic Convex Optimization)

Idan Amir
Yair Carmon
Tomer Koren
Roi Livni

We study the generalization performance of $\text{\emph{full-batch}}$ optimization algorithms for stochastic convex optimization: these are first-order methods that only access the exact gradient of the empirical risk (rather than gradients with respect to individual data points), that include a wide range of algorithms such as gradient descent, mirror descent, and their regularized and/or accelerated variants. We provide a new separation result showing that, while algorithms such as stochastic gradient descent can generalize and optimize the population risk to within $\epsilon$ after $O(1/\epsilon^2)$ iterations, full-batch methods either need at least $\Omega(1/\epsilon^4)$ iterations or exhibit a dimension-dependent sample complexity.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

A Limitation of the PAC-Bayes Framework

Roi Livni
Shay Moran

PAC-Bayes is a useful framework for deriving generalization bounds which was introduced by McAllester ('98). This framework has the flexibility of deriving distribution- and algorithm-dependent bounds, which are often tighter than VC-related uniform convergence bounds. In this manuscript we present a limitation for the PAC-Bayes framework. We demonstrate an easy learning task which is not amenable to a PAC-Bayes analysis. Specifically, we consider the task of linear classification in 1D; it is well-known that this task is learnable using just $O(\log(1/\delta)/\epsilon)$ examples. On the other hand, we show that this fact can not be proved using a PAC-Bayes analysis: for any algorithm that learns 1-dimensional linear classifiers there exists a (realizable) distribution for which the PAC-Bayes bound is arbitrarily large.

FOCS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Prediction

Mark Bun
Roi Livni
Shay Moran

We prove that every concept class with finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an (approximate) differentially-private algorithm. This answers an open question of Alon et al. (STOC 2019) who proved the converse statement (this question was also asked by Neel et al. (FOCS 2019)). Together these two results yield an equivalence between online learnability and private PAC learnability. We introduce a new notion of algorithmic stability called “global stability” which is essential to our proof and may be of independent interest. We also discuss an application of our results to boosting the privacy and accuracy parameters of differentially-private learners.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Can Implicit Bias Explain Generalization? Stochastic Convex Optimization as a Case Study

Assaf Dauber
Meir Feder
Tomer Koren
Roi Livni

The notion of implicit bias, or implicit regularization, has been suggested as a means to explain the surprising generalization ability of modern-days overparameterized learning algorithms. This notion refers to the tendency of the optimization algorithm towards a certain structured solution that often generalizes well. Recently, several papers have studied implicit regularization and were able to identify this phenomenon in various scenarios. We revisit this paradigm in arguably the simplest non-trivial setup, and study the implicit bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in the context of Stochastic Convex Optimization. As a first step, we provide a simple construction that rules out the existence of a \emph{distribution-independent} implicit regularizer that governs the generalization ability of SGD. We then demonstrate a learning problem that rules out a very general class of \emph{distribution-dependent} implicit regularizers from explaining generalization, which includes strongly convex regularizers as well as non-degenerate norm-based regularizations. Certain aspects of our constructions point out to significant difficulties in providing a comprehensive explanation of an algorithm's generalization performance by solely arguing about its implicit regularization properties.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Prediction with Corrupted Expert Advice

Idan Amir
Idan Attias
Tomer Koren
Yishay Mansour
Roi Livni

We revisit the fundamental problem of prediction with expert advice, in a setting where the environment is benign and generates losses stochastically, but the feedback observed by the learner is subject to a moderate adversarial corruption. We prove that a variant of the classical Multiplicative Weights algorithm with decreasing step sizes achieves constant regret in this setting and performs optimally in a wide range of environments, regardless of the magnitude of the injected corruption. Our results reveal a surprising disparity between the often comparable Follow the Regularized Leader (FTRL) and Online Mirror Descent (OMD) frameworks: we show that for experts in the corrupted stochastic regime, the regret performance of OMD is in fact strictly inferior to that of FTRL.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Synthetic Data Generators -- Sequential and Private

Olivier Bousquet
Roi Livni
Shay Moran

We study the sample complexity of private synthetic data generation over an unbounded sized class of statistical queries, and show that any class that is privately proper PAC learnable admits a private synthetic data generator (perhaps non-efficient). A differentially private synthetic generator is an algorithm that receives an IID data and publishes synthetic data that is indistinguishable from the true data w. r. t a given fixed class of statistical queries. The synthetic data set can then be used by a data scientist without compromising the privacy of the original data set. Previous work on synthetic data generators focused on the case that the query class $\D$ is finite and obtained sample complexity bounds that scale logarithmically with the size $|\D|$. Here we construct a private synthetic data generator whose sample complexity is independent of the domain size, and we replace finiteness with the assumption that $\D$ is privately PAC learnable (a formally weaker task, hence we obtain equivalence between the two tasks). Our proof relies on a new type of synthetic data generator, Sequential Synthetic Data Generators, which we believe may be of interest of their own right. A sequential SDG is defined by a sequential game between a generator that proposes synthetic distributions and a discriminator that tries to distinguish between real and fake distributions. We characterize the classes that admit a sequential-SDG and show that they are exactly Littlestone classes. Given the online nature of the sequential setting, it is natural that Littlestone classes arise in this context. Nevertheless, the characterization of sequential--SDGs by Littlestone classes turns out to be technically challenging, and to the best of the author's knowledge, does not follow via simple reductions to online prediction.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Graph-based Discriminators: Sample Complexity and Expressiveness

Roi Livni
Yishay Mansour

A basic question in learning theory is to identify if two distributions are identical when we have access only to examples sampled from the distributions. This basic task is considered, for example, in the context of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), where a discriminator is trained to distinguish between a real-life distribution and a synthetic distribution. Classically, we use a hypothesis class $H$ and claim that the two distributions are distinct if for some $h\in H$ the expected value on the two distributions is (significantly) different. Our starting point is the following fundamental problem: "is having the hypothesis dependent on more than a single random example beneficial". To address this challenge we define $k$-ary based discriminators, which have a family of Boolean $k$-ary functions $\G$. Each function $g\in \G$ naturally defines a hyper-graph, indicating whether a given hyper-edge exists. A function $g\in \G$ distinguishes between two distributions, if the expected value of $g$, on a $k$-tuple of i. i. d examples, on the two distributions is (significantly) different. We study the expressiveness of families of $k$-ary functions, compared to the classical hypothesis class $H$, which is $k=1$. We show a separation in expressiveness of $k+1$-ary versus $k$-ary functions. This demonstrate the great benefit of having $k\geq 2$ as distinguishers. For $k\geq 2$ we introduce a notion similar to the VC-dimension, and show that it controls the sample complexity. We proceed and provide upper and lower bounds as a function of our extended notion of VC-dimension.

STOC Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension

Noga Alon
Roi Livni
Maryanthe Malliaris
Shay Moran

We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class H with Littlestone dimension d requires Ω(log * ( d )) examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over ℕ can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves open questions due to [Bun et al. 2015] and [Feldman and Xiao, 2015]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Affine-Invariant Online Optimization and the Low-rank Experts Problem

Tomer Koren
Roi Livni

We present a new affine-invariant optimization algorithm called Online Lazy Newton. The regret of Online Lazy Newton is independent of conditioning: the algorithm's performance depends on the best possible preconditioning of the problem in retrospect and on its \emph{intrinsic} dimensionality. As an application, we show how Online Lazy Newton can be used to achieve an optimal regret of order $\sqrt{rT}$ for the low-rank experts problem, improving by a $\sqrt{r}$ factor over the previously best known bound and resolving an open problem posed by Hazan et al (2016).

ICML Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Learning Infinite Layer Networks Without the Kernel Trick

Roi Livni
Daniel Carmon
Amir Globerson

Infinite Layer Networks (ILN) have been proposed as an architecture that mimics neural networks while enjoying some of the advantages of kernel methods. ILN are networks that integrate over infinitely many nodes within a single hidden layer. It has been demonstrated by several authors that the problem of learning ILN can be reduced to the kernel trick, implying that whenever a certain integral can be computed analytically they are efficiently learnable. In this work we give an online algorithm for ILN, which avoids the kernel trick assumption. More generally and of independent interest, we show that kernel methods in general can be exploited even when the kernel cannot be efficiently computed but can only be estimated via sampling. We provide a regret analysis for our algorithm, showing that it matches the sample complexity of methods which have access to kernel values. Thus, our method is the first to demonstrate that the kernel trick is not necessary, as such, and random features suffice to obtain comparable performance.

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Multi-Armed Bandits with Metric Movement Costs

Tomer Koren
Roi Livni
Yishay Mansour

We consider the non-stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit problem in a setting where there is a fixed and known metric on the action space that determines a cost for switching between any pair of actions. The loss of the online learner has two components: the first is the usual loss of the selected actions, and the second is an additional loss due to switching between actions. Our main contribution gives a tight characterization of the expected minimax regret in this setting, in terms of a complexity measure $\mathcal{C}$ of the underlying metric which depends on its covering numbers. In finite metric spaces with $k$ actions, we give an efficient algorithm that achieves regret of the form $\widetilde(\max\set{\mathcal{C}^{1/3}T^{2/3}, \sqrt{kT}})$, and show that this is the best possible. Our regret bound generalizes previous known regret bounds for some special cases: (i) the unit-switching cost regret $\widetilde{\Theta}(\max\set{k^{1/3}T^{2/3}, \sqrt{kT}})$ where $\mathcal{C}=\Theta(k)$, and (ii) the interval metric with regret $\widetilde{\Theta}(\max\set{T^{2/3}, \sqrt{kT}})$ where $\mathcal{C}=\Theta(1)$. For infinite metrics spaces with Lipschitz loss functions, we derive a tight regret bound of $\widetilde{\Theta}(T^{\frac{d+1}{d+2}})$ where $d \ge 1$ is the Minkowski dimension of the space, which is known to be tight even when there are no switching costs.

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Online Pricing with Strategic and Patient Buyers

Michal Feldman
Tomer Koren
Roi Livni
Yishay Mansour
Aviv Zohar

We consider a seller with an unlimited supply of a single good, who is faced with a stream of $T$ buyers. Each buyer has a window of time in which she would like to purchase, and would buy at the lowest price in that window, provided that this price is lower than her private value (and otherwise, would not buy at all). In this setting, we give an algorithm that attains $O(T^{2/3})$ regret over any sequence of $T$ buyers with respect to the best fixed price in hindsight, and prove that no algorithm can perform better in the worst case.

ICML Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Classification with Low Rank and Missing Data

Elad Hazan
Roi Livni
Yishay Mansour

We consider classification and regression tasks where we have missing data and assume that the (clean) data resides in a low rank subspace. Finding a hidden subspace is known to be computationally hard. Nevertheless, using a non-proper formulation we give an efficient agnostic algorithm that classifies as good as the best linear classifier coupled with the best low-dimensional subspace in which the data resides. A direct implication is that our algorithm can linearly (and non-linearly through kernels) classify provably as well as the best classifier that has access to the full data.

NeurIPS Conference 2014 Conference Paper

On the Computational Efficiency of Training Neural Networks

Roi Livni
Shai Shalev-Shwartz
Ohad Shamir

It is well-known that neural networks are computationally hard to train. On the other hand, in practice, modern day neural networks are trained efficiently using SGD and a variety of tricks that include different activation functions (e. g. ReLU), over-specification (i. e. , train networks which are larger than needed), and regularization. In this paper we revisit the computational complexity of training neural networks from a modern perspective. We provide both positive and negative results, some of them yield new provably efficient and practical algorithms for training neural networks.

ICML Conference 2013 Conference Paper

Vanishing Component Analysis

Roi Livni
David Lehavi
Sagi Schein
Hila Nachlieli
Shai Shalev-Shwartz
Amir Globerson

The vanishing ideal of a set of n points S, is the set of all polynomials that attain the value of zero on all the points in S. Such ideals can be compactly represented using a small set of polynomials known as generators of the ideal. Here we describe and analyze an efficient procedure that constructs a set of generators of a vanishing ideal. Our procedure is numerically stable, and can be used to find approximately vanishing polynomials. The resulting polynomials capture nonlinear structure in data, and can for example be used within supervised learning. Empirical comparison with kernel methods show that our method constructs more compact classifiers with comparable accuracy.