Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Roberto Confalonieri

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

10 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

10

KR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Categorical Explaining Functors: Ensuring Coherence in Logical Explanations

  • Stefano Fioravanti
  • Francesco Giannini
  • Pietro Barbiero
  • Paolo Frazzetto
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Fabio Zanasi
  • Nicolò Navarin

Post-hoc methods in Explainable AI (XAI) elucidate black-box models by identifying input features critical to the model's decision-making. Recent advancements in these methods have facilitated the generation of logic-based explanations that capture interactions among input features. However, these techniques often encounter critical limitations, notably the inability to ensure logical consistency and fidelity between generated explanations and the model's actual decision-making processes. Such inconsistencies jeopardize the reliability of explanations particularly in high-risk domains. To address this gap, we introduce a novel, theoretically rigorous approach rooted in category theory. Specifically, we propose the concept of an explaining functor, which preserves logical entailment structurally between the explanations and the decisions of black-box models. By establishing a categorical framework, our method guarantees the coherence and accuracy of extracted explanations, thus overcoming the common pitfalls associated with heuristic-based explanation methods. We demonstrate the practical efficacy of our theoretical contributions through two synthetic benchmarks that highlight significant reductions in contradictory and unfaithful explanations. Our experiments show how our framework can provide mathematically grounded, compositional, and coherent explanations.

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Extracting PAC Decision Trees from Black Box Binary Classifiers: The Gender Bias Study Case on BERT-based Language Models

  • Ana Ozaki
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Ricardo Guimarães
  • Anders Imenes

Decision trees are a popular machine learning method, valued for their inherent explainability. In Explainable AI, decision trees serve as surrogate models for complex black box AI models or as approximations of parts of such models. A key challenge of this approach is assessing how accurately the extracted decision tree represents the original model and determining the extent to which it can be trusted as an approximation of its behaviour. In this work, we investigate the use of the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework to provide a theoretical guarantee of fidelity for decision trees extracted from AI models. Leveraging the theoretical foundations of the PAC framework, we adapt a decision tree algorithm to ensure a PAC guarantee under specific conditions. We focus on binary classification and conduct experiments where we extract decision trees from BERT-based language models with PAC guarantees. Our results indicate occupational gender bias in these models, which confirm previous results in the literature. Additionally, the decision tree format enhances the visualization of which occupations are most impacted by social bias.

NAI Journal 2025 Journal Article

On the multiple roles of ontologies in explanations for neuro-symbolic AI

  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi

There has been a renewed interest in symbolic AI in recent years. Symbolic AI is indeed one of the key enabling technologies for the development of neuro-symbolic AI systems, as it can mitigate the limited capabilities of black box deep learning models to perform reasoning and provide support for explanations. This paper discusses the different roles that explicit knowledge, in particular ontologies, can play in drawing intelligible explanations in neuro-symbolic AI. We consider three main perspectives in which ontologies can contribute significantly, namely reference modelling, common-sense reasoning, and knowledge refinement and complexity management. We overview some of the existing approaches in the literature, and we position them according to these three proposed perspectives. The paper concludes by discussing some open challenges related to the adoption of ontologies in explanations.

IS Journal 2024 Journal Article

An Operational Framework for Guiding Human Evaluation in Explainable and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Jose Maria Alonso-Moral

The assessment of explanations by humans presents a significant challenge within the context of explainable and trustworthy artificial intelligence. This is attributed not only to the absence of universal metrics and standardized evaluation methods but also to the complexities tied to devising user studies that assess the perceived human comprehensibility of these explanations. To address this gap, we introduce a survey-based methodology for guiding the human evaluation of explanations. This approach amalgamates leading practices from existing literature and is implemented as an operational framework. This framework assists researchers throughout the evaluation process, encompassing hypothesis formulation, online user study implementation and deployment, and analysis and interpretation of collected data. The application of this framework is exemplified through two practical user studies.

AIJ Journal 2021 Journal Article

Using ontologies to enhance human understandability of global post-hoc explanations of black-box models

  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Tillman Weyde
  • Tarek R. Besold
  • Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín

The interest in explainable artificial intelligence has grown strongly in recent years because of the need to convey safety and trust in the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of automated decision-making to users. While a plethora of approaches has been developed, only a few focus on how to use domain knowledge and how this influences the understanding of explanations by users. In this paper, we show that by using ontologies we can improve the human understandability of global post-hoc explanations, presented in the form of decision trees. In particular, we introduce Trepan Reloaded, which builds on Trepan, an algorithm that extracts surrogate decision trees from black-box models. Trepan Reloaded includes ontologies, that model domain knowledge, in the process of extracting explanations to improve their understandability. We tested the understandability of the extracted explanations by humans in a user study with four different tasks. We evaluate the results in terms of response times and correctness, subjective ease of understanding and confidence, and similarity of free text responses. The results show that decision trees generated with Trepan Reloaded, taking into account domain knowledge, are significantly more understandable throughout than those generated by standard Trepan. The enhanced understandability of post-hoc explanations is achieved with little compromise on the accuracy with which the surrogate decision trees replicate the behaviour of the original neural network models.

AIJ Journal 2018 Journal Article

A computational framework for conceptual blending

  • Manfred Eppe
  • Ewen Maclean
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Oliver Kutz
  • Marco Schorlemmer
  • Enric Plaza
  • Kai-Uwe Kühnberger

We present a computational framework for conceptual blending, a concept invention method that is advocated in cognitive science as a fundamental and uniquely human engine for creative thinking. Our framework treats a crucial part of the blending process, namely the generalisation of input concepts, as a search problem that is solved by means of modern answer set programming methods to find commonalities among input concepts. We also address the problem of pruning the space of possible blends by introducing metrics that capture most of the so-called optimality principles, described in the cognitive science literature as guidelines to produce meaningful and serendipitous blends. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate how our system invents novel concepts and theories in domains where creativity is crucial, namely mathematics and music.

AAAI Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Repairing Ontologies via Axiom Weakening

  • Nicolas Troquard
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Pietro Galliani
  • Rafael Peñaloza
  • Daniele Porello
  • Oliver Kutz

Ontology engineering is a hard and error-prone task, in which small changes may lead to errors, or even produce an inconsistent ontology. As ontologies grow in size, the need for automated methods for repairing inconsistencies while preserving as much of the original knowledge as possible increases. Most previous approaches to this task are based on removing a few axioms from the ontology to regain consistency. We propose a new method based on weakening these axioms to make them less restrictive, employing the use of refinement operators. We introduce the theoretical framework for weakening DL ontologies, propose algorithms to repair ontologies based on the framework, and provide an analysis of the computational complexity. Through an empirical analysis made over real-life ontologies, we show that our approach preserves significantly more of the original knowledge of the ontology than removing axioms.

IJCAI Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Two Approaches to Ontology Aggregation Based on Axiom Weakening

  • Daniele Porello
  • Nicolas Troquard
  • Rafael Peñaloza
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Pietro Galliani
  • Oliver Kutz

Axiom weakening is a novel technique that allows for fine-grained repair of inconsistent ontologies. In a multi-agent setting, integrating ontologies corresponding to multiple agents may lead to inconsistencies. Such inconsistencies can be resolved after the integrated ontology has been built, or their generation can be prevented during ontology generation. We implement and compare these two approaches. First, we study how to repair an inconsistent ontology resulting from a voting-based aggregation of views of heterogeneous agents. Second, we prevent the generation of inconsistencies by letting the agents engage in a turn-based rational protocol about the axioms to be added to the integrated ontology. We instantiate the two approaches using real-world ontologies and compare them by measuring the levels of satisfaction of the agents w. r. t. the ontology obtained by the two procedures.

IJCAI Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Computational Invention of Cadences and Chord Progressions by Conceptual Chord-Blending

  • Manfred Eppe
  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Ewen Maclean
  • Maximos Kaliakatsos
  • Emilios Cambouropoulos
  • Marco Schorlemmer
  • Mihai Codescu
  • Kai-Uwe K

We present a computational framework for chord invention based on a cognitive-theoretic perspective on conceptual blending. The framework builds on algebraic specifications, and solves two musicological problems. It automatically finds transitions between chord progressions of different keys or idioms, and it substitutes chords in a chord progression by other chords of a similar function, as a means to create novel variations. The approach is demonstrated with several examples where jazz cadences are invented by blending chords in cadences from earlier idioms, and where novel chord progressions are generated by inventing transition chords.

EAAI Journal 2015 Journal Article

Engineering multiuser museum interactives for shared cultural experiences

  • Roberto Confalonieri
  • Matthew Yee-King
  • Katina Hazelden
  • Mark d׳Inverno
  • Dave de Jonge
  • Nardine Osman
  • Carles Sierra
  • Leila Agmoud

Multiuser museum interactives are computer systems installed in museums or galleries which allow several visitors to interact together with digital representations of artefacts and information from the museum׳s collection. In this paper, we describe WeCurate, a socio-technical system that supports co-browsing across multiple devices and enables groups of users to collaboratively curate a collection of images, through negotiation, collective decision making and voting. The engineering of such a system is challenging since it requires to address several problems such as: distributed workflow control, collective decision making and multiuser synchronous interactions. The system uses a peer-to-peer Electronic Institution (EI) to manage and execute a distributed curation workflow and models community interactions into scenes, where users engage in different social activities. Social interactions are enacted by intelligent agents that interface the users participating in the curation workflow with the EI infrastructure. The multiagent system supports collective decision making, representing the actions of the users within the EI, where the agents advocate and support the desires of their users e. g. aggregating opinions for deciding which images are interesting enough to be discussed, and proposing interactions and resolutions between disagreeing group members. Throughout the paper, we describe the enabling technologies of WeCurate, the peer-to-peer EI infrastructure, the agent collective decision making capabilities and the multi-modal interface. We present a system evaluation based on data collected from cultural exhibitions in which WeCurate was used as supporting multiuser interactive.

v2026.09.13