Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Richard Dazeley

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

15 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

15

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

DAPointMamba: Domain Adaptive Point Mamba for Point Cloud Completion

  • Yinghui Li
  • Qianyu Zhou
  • Di Shao
  • Hao Yang
  • Ye Zhu
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Xuequan Lu

Domain adaptive point cloud completion (DA PCC) aims to narrow the geometric and semantic discrepancies between the labeled source and unlabeled target domains. Existing methods either suffer from limited receptive fields or quadratic complexity due to using CNNs or vision Transformers. In this paper, we present the first work that studies the adaptability of state space models (SSMs) in DA PCC and find that directly applying SSMs to DA PCC will encounter several challenges: directly serializing 3D point clouds into 1D sequences often disrupts the spatial topology and local geometric features of the target domain. Besides, the overlook of designs in the learning domain-agnostic representations hinders the adaptation performance. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework, DAPointMamba for DA PCC, that exhibits strong adaptability across domains and has the advantages of global receptive fields and efficient linear complexity. It has three novel modules. In particular, Cross-Domain Patch-Level Scanning introduces patch-level geometric correspondences, enabling effective local alignment. Cross-Domain Spatial SSM Alignment further strengthens spatial consistency by modulating patch features based on cross-domain similarity, effectively mitigating fine-grained structural discrepancies. Cross-Domain Channel SSM Alignment actively addresses global semantic gaps by interleaving and aligning feature channels. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that our DAPointMamba outperforms state-of-the-art methods with less computational complexity and inference latency.

TMLR Journal 2026 Journal Article

Diversity Sampling Regularization for Multi-Domain Generalization

  • Lakpa Tamang
  • Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek
  • Sunil Aryal
  • Richard Dazeley

Domain Generalization (DG) seeks to create models that can successfully generalize to new, unseen target domains without the need for target domain data during training. Traditional approaches often rely on data augmentation or feature mixing techniques, such as MixUp; however, these methods may fall short in capturing the essential diversity within the feature space, resulting in limited robustness against domain shifts. In this research, we revisit the importance of diversity in DG tasks and propose a simple yet effective method to improve DG performance through diversity-sampling regularization. Specifically, we calculate entropy values for input data to assess their prediction uncertainty, and use these values to guide sampling through Determinantal Point Process (DPP), which prioritizes selecting data sub- sets with high diversity. By incorporating DPP-based diversity sampling as a regularization strategy, our framework enhances the standard Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) objec- tive, promoting the learning of domain-agnostic features without relying on explicit data aug- mentation. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our method on standard DG bench- marks, including PACS, VLCS, OfficeHome, TerraIncognita, and DomainNet, and through extensive experiments show that it consistently improves generalization to unseen domains and outperforms widely used baselines and S.O.T.A without relying on any task-specific heuristics.

AAMAS Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Learning Rewards, Not Labels: Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Machinery Fault Detection

  • Dhiraj Neupane
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek
  • Sunil Aryal

Reinforcement learning (RL) offers significant promise for machinery fault detection (MFD). However, most existing RL-based MFD approaches do not fully exploit RL’s sequential decision-making strengths, oftentreatingMFDasasimpleguessinggame (Contextual Bandits). To bridge this gap, we formulate MFD as an offline inverse reinforcement learning problem, where the agent learns the reward dynamics directly from healthy operational sequences, thereby bypassing the need for manual reward engineering and fault labels. Our framework employs Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning to train a discriminator that distinguishes between normal (expert) and policy-generated transitions. The discriminator’s learned reward serves as an anomaly score, indicating deviations from normal operating behaviour. When evaluated on three runto-failure benchmark datasets (HUMS2023, IMS, and XJTU-SY), the model consistently assigns low anomaly scores to normal samples and high scores to faulty ones, enabling early and robust fault detection. By aligning RL’s sequential reasoning with MFD’s temporal structure, this work opens a path toward RL-based diagnostics in data-driven industrial settings.

AAMAS Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning

  • Andrés Holgado-Sánchez
  • Peter Vamplew
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Sascha Ossowski
  • Holger Billhardt

Value-aware AI should recognise human values and adapt to the value systems (value-based preferences) of different users. This requires acquiring computable representations of values, a process that can be prone to misspecification. The social nature of values demands their representation to adhere to multiple users while value systems are diverse, yet exhibit patterns among groups. In sequential decision making, efforts have been made towards personalization for different goals or values from demonstrations of diverse agents. However, these approaches demand manually designed features or lack value-based interpretability and/or adaptability to diverse user preferences. We propose algorithms for learning models of value alignment and value systems for a society of agents in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), based on clustering and preference-based multiobjectivereinforcementlearning(PbMORL). Wejointlylearnsociallyderived value alignment models (groundings) and a set of value systems that concisely represent different groups of users (clusters) in a society. Each cluster consists of a value system representing the value-based preferences of its members and an approximately Pareto-optimal policy that reflects behaviours aligned with this value system. We evaluate our method against a state-of-the-art PbMORL algorithm and baselines on two MDPs with human values.

KER Journal 2025 Journal Article

An empirical investigation of value-based multi-objective reinforcement learning for stochastic environments

  • Kewen Ding
  • Peter Vamplew
  • Cameron Foale
  • Richard Dazeley

Abstract One common approach to solve multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) problems is to extend conventional Q-learning by using vector Q-values in combination with a utility function. However issues can arise with this approach in the context of stochastic environments, particularly when optimising for the scalarised expected reward (SER) criterion. This paper extends prior research, providing a detailed examination of the factors influencing the frequency with which value-based MORL Q-learning algorithms learn the SER-optimal policy for an environment with stochastic state transitions. We empirically examine several variations of the core multi-objective Q-learning algorithm as well as reward engineering approaches and demonstrate the limitations of these methods. In particular, we highlight the critical impact of the noisy Q-value estimates issue on the stability and convergence of these algorithms.

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

DAPoinTr: Domain Adaptive Point Transformer for Point Cloud Completion

  • Yinghui Li
  • Qianyu Zhou
  • Jingyu Gong
  • Ye Zhu
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Xinkui Zhao
  • Xuequan Lu

Point Transformers (PoinTr) have shown great potential in point cloud completion recently. Nevertheless, effective domain adaptation that improves transferability toward target domains remains unexplored. In this paper, we delve into this topic and empirically discover that direct feature alignment on point Transformer’s CNN backbone only brings limited improvements since it cannot guarantee sequence-wise domain-invariant features in the Transformer. To this end, we propose a pioneering Domain Adaptive Point Transformer (DAPoinTr) framework for point cloud completion. DAPoinTr consists of three novel components: Domain Query-based Feature Alignment (DQFA), Point Token-wise Feature alignment (PTFA), and Voted Prediction Consistency (VPC). In particular, DQFA is presented to narrow the global domain gaps from the sequence via the presented domain proxy and domain query at the Transformer encoder and decoder, respectively. PTFA is proposed to close the local domain shifts by aligning the tokens, i.e., point proxy and dynamic query, at the Transformer encoder and decoder, respectively. VPC is designed to consider different Transformer decoders as multiple of experts (MoE) for ensembled prediction voting and pseudo-label generation. Extensive experiments with visualization on several challenging domain adaptation benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our DAPoinTr compared with other state-of-the-art methods.

AAMAS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Utility-Based Reinforcement Learning: Unifying Single-objective and Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning

  • Peter Vamplew
  • Cameron Foale
  • Conor F. Hayes
  • Patrick Mannion
  • Enda Howley
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Scott Johnson
  • Johan Källström

Research in multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) has introduced the utility-based paradigm, which makes use of both environmental rewards and a function that defines the utility derived by the user from those rewards. In this paper we extend this paradigm to the context of single-objective reinforcement learning (RL), and outline multiple potential benefits including the ability to perform multi-policy learning across tasks relating to uncertain objectives, risk-aware RL, discounting, and safe RL. We also examine the algorithmic implications of adopting a utility-based approach.

AAMAS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

A Brief Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planning

  • Conor F. Hayes
  • Roxana Rădulescu
  • Eugenio Bargiacchi
  • Johan Källström
  • Matthew Macfarlane
  • Mathieu Reymond
  • Timothy Verstraeten
  • Luisa M. Zintgraf

Real-world sequential decision-making tasks are usually complex, and require trade-offs between multiple – often conflicting – objectives. However, the majority of research in reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-theoretic planning assumes a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be handled via a predefined weighted sum over the objectives. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying problem, and produce suboptimal results. This extended abstract outlines the limitations of using a semi-blind iterative process to solve multi-objective decision making problems. Our extended paper [4], serves as a guide for the application of explicitly multi-objective methods to difficult problems.

AAMAS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Scalar Reward is Not Enough

  • Peter Vamplew
  • Benjamin J. Smith
  • Johan Källström
  • Gabriel Ramos
  • Roxana Rădulescu
  • Diederik M. Roijers
  • Conor F. Hayes
  • Friedrik Hentz

Silver et al. [14] posit that scalar reward maximisation is sufficient to underpin all intelligence and provides a suitable basis for artificial general intelligence (AGI). This extended abstract summarises the counter-argument from our JAAMAS paper[19].

IROS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Evaluating Human-like Explanations for Robot Actions in Reinforcement Learning Scenarios

  • Francisco Cruz 0002
  • Charlotte Young
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Peter Vamplew 0001

Explainable artificial intelligence is a research field that tries to provide more transparency for autonomous intelligent systems. Explainability has been used, particularly in reinforcement learning and robotic scenarios, to better understand the robot decision-making process. Previous work, however, has been widely focused on providing technical explanations that can be better understood by AI practitioners than non-expert end-users. In this work, we make use of human-like explanations built from the probability of success to complete the goal that an autonomous robot shows after performing an action. These explanations are intended to be understood by people who have no or very little experience with artificial intelligence methods. This paper presents a user trial to study whether these explanations that focus on the probability an action has of succeeding in its goal constitute a suitable explanation for non-expert end-users. The results obtained show that non-expert participants rate robot explanations that focus on the probability of success higher and with less variance than technical explanations generated from Q-values, and also favor counterfactual explanations over standalone explanations.

AIJ Journal 2021 Journal Article

Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanations

  • Richard Dazeley
  • Peter Vamplew
  • Cameron Foale
  • Charlotte Young
  • Sunil Aryal
  • Francisco Cruz

Over the last few years there has been rapid research growth into eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and the closely aligned Interpretable Machine Learning (IML). Drivers for this growth include recent legislative changes and increased investments by industry and governments, along with increased concern from the general public. People are affected by autonomous decisions every day and the public need to understand the decision-making process to accept the outcomes. However, the vast majority of the applications of XAI/IML are focused on providing low-level ‘narrow’ explanations of how an individual decision was reached based on a particular datum. While important, these explanations rarely provide insights into an agent's: beliefs and motivations; hypotheses of other (human, animal or AI) agents' intentions; interpretation of external cultural expectations; or, processes used to generate its own explanation. Yet all of these factors, we propose, are essential to providing the explanatory depth that people require to accept and trust the AI's decision-making. This paper aims to define levels of explanation and describe how they can be integrated to create a human-aligned conversational explanation system. In so doing, this paper will survey current approaches and discuss the integration of different technologies to achieve these levels with Broad eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (Broad-XAI), and thereby move towards high-level ‘strong’ explanations.

EAAI Journal 2021 Journal Article

Potential-based multiobjective reinforcement learning approaches to low-impact agents for AI safety

  • Peter Vamplew
  • Cameron Foale
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Adam Bignold

The concept of impact-minimisation has previously been proposed as an approach to addressing the safety concerns that can arise from utility-maximising agents. An impact-minimising agent takes into account the potential impact of its actions on the state of the environment when selecting actions, so as to avoid unacceptable side-effects. This paper proposes and empirically evaluates an implementation of impact-minimisation within the framework of multiobjective reinforcement learning. The key contributions are a novel potential-based approach to specifying a measure of impact, and an examination of a variety of non-linear action-selection operators so as to achieve an acceptable trade-off between achieving the agent’s primary task and minimising environmental impact. These experiments also highlight a previously unreported issue with noisy estimates for multiobjective agents using non-linear action-selection, which has broader implications for the application of multiobjective reinforcement learning.

EAAI Journal 2020 Journal Article

A multi-objective deep reinforcement learning framework

  • Thanh Thi Nguyen
  • Ngoc Duy Nguyen
  • Peter Vamplew
  • Saeid Nahavandi
  • Richard Dazeley
  • Chee Peng Lim

This paper introduces a new scalable multi-objective deep reinforcement learning (MODRL) framework based on deep Q-networks. We develop a high-performance MODRL framework that supports both single-policy and multi-policy strategies, as well as both linear and non-linear approaches to action selection. The experimental results on two benchmark problems (two-objective deep sea treasure environment and three-objective Mountain Car problem) indicate that the proposed framework is able to find the Pareto-optimal solutions effectively. The proposed framework is generic and highly modularized, which allows the integration of different deep reinforcement learning algorithms in different complex problem domains. This therefore overcomes many disadvantages involved with standard multi-objective reinforcement learning methods in the current literature. The proposed framework acts as a testbed platform that accelerates the development of MODRL for solving increasingly complicated multi-objective problems.

RLDM Conference 2015 Conference Abstract

Coarse Q-Learning: Addressing the convergence problem when quantizing continuous state variables

  • Richard Dazeley
  • Peter Vamplew

Value-based approaches to reinforcement learning (RL) maintain a value function that measures the long term utility of a state or state-action pair. A long standing issue in RL is how to create a fi- nite representation in a continuous, and therefore infinite, state environment. The common approach is to use function approximators such as tile coding, memory or instance based methods. These provide some balance between generalisation, resolution, and storage, but converge slowly in multidimensional state en- vironments. Another approach of quantizing state into lookup tables has been commonly regarded as highly problematic, due to large memory requirements and poor generalisation. In particular, attempting to reduce memory requirements and increase generalisation by using coarser quantization forms a non-Markovian system that does not converge. This paper investigates the problem in using quantized lookup tables and presents an extension to the Q-Learning algorithm, referred to as Coarse Q-Learning (CQL), which resolves these issues. The presented algorithm will be shown to drastically reduce the memory requirements and in- crease generalisation by simulating the Markov property. In particular, this algorithm means the size of the input space is determined by the granularity required by the policy being learnt, rather than by the inadequa- cies of the learning algorithm or the nature of the state-reward dynamics of the environment. Importantly, the method presented solves the problem represented by the curse of dimensionality.

EWRL Workshop 2015 Workshop Paper

Why Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning?

  • Diederik Roijers
  • Shimon Whiteson
  • Peter Vamplew
  • Richard Dazeley

We argue that multi-objective methods are underrepresented in RL research, and present three scenarios to justify the need for explicitly multi-objective approaches. Key to these scenarios is that although the utility the user derives from a policy — which is what we ultimately aim to optimize — is scalar, it is sometimes impossible, undesirable or infeasible to formulate the problem as single-objective at the moment when the policies need to be learned. We also present the case for a utility-based view of multi-objective RL, i.e., that the appropriate multi-objective solution concept should be derived from what we know about the user’s utility function, rather than axiomatically assumed to be the Pareto front.

v2026.09.13