Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Rafael Frongillo

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

21 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

21

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Consistency Conditions for Differentiable Surrogate Losses

  • Drona Khurana
  • Anish Thilagar
  • Dhamma Kimpara
  • Rafael Frongillo

The statistical consistency of surrogate losses for discrete prediction tasks is often checked using the condition of calibration. However, directly verifying calibration can be arduous. Recent work shows that for polyhedral surrogates, a less arduous condition, indirect elicitation (IE), is still equivalent to calibration. We give the first results of this type for non-polyhedral surrogates, specifically the class of convex differentiable losses. We first prove that under mild conditions, IE and calibration are equivalent for one-dimensional losses in this class. We construct a counter-example that shows that this equivalence fails in higher dimensions. This motivates the introduction of strong IE, a strengthened form of IE that is equally easy to verify. We establish that strong IE implies calibration for differentiable surrogates and is both necessary and sufficient for strongly convex, differentiable surrogates. Finally, we apply these results to a range of problems to demonstrate the power of IE and strong IE for designing and analyzing consistent differentiable surrogates.

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Forecasting Competitions with Correlated Events

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Manuel Lladser
  • Anish Thilagar
  • Bo Waggoner

Beginning with Witkowski et al. (2023), recent work on forecasting competitions has addressed incentive problems with the common winner-take-all mechanism. Frongillo et al. (2021) propose a competition mechanism based on Multiplicative Weights, an online learning algorithm. They show that their mechanism selects an epsilon-optimal forecaster with high probability using only O(log(n)/epsilon^2) events. These works, together with all prior work on this problem thus far, assume that events are independent. We prove the first accuracy and approximate truthfulness guarantees for forecasting competitions with correlated events. To quantify correlation, we introduce a notion of block correlation, which allows each event to be strongly correlated with up to b others and weakly correlated with the rest. We show that under distributions with this correlation, the Multiplicative Weights mechanism retains its epsilon-optimal guarantee using O(b^2 log(n)/epsilon^2) events. Our proof involves a novel concentration bound for correlated random variables which may be of broader interest.

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Hedging and Approximate Truthfulness in Traditional Forecasting Competitions

  • Mary Monroe
  • Anish Thilagar
  • Melody Hsu
  • Rafael Frongillo

In forecasting competitions, the traditional mechanism scores the predictions of each contestant against the outcome of each event, and the contestant with the highest total score wins. While it is well-known that this traditional mechanism can suffer from incentive issues, it is folklore that contestants will still be roughly truthful as the number of events grows. Yet thus far the literature lacks a formal analysis of this traditional mechanism. This paper gives the first such analysis. We first demonstrate that the "long-run truthfulness" folklore is false: even for arbitrary numbers of events, the best forecaster can have an incentive to hedge, reporting more moderate beliefs to increase their win probability. On the positive side, however, we show that two contestants will be approximately truthful when they have sufficient uncertainty over the relative quality of their opponent and the outcomes of the events, a case which may arise in practice.

TCS Journal 2022 Journal Article

Computational complexity of problems for deterministic presentations of sofic shifts

  • Justin Cai
  • Rafael Frongillo

Sofic shifts are symbolic dynamical systems defined by the set of bi-infinite sequences on an edge-labeled directed graph, called a presentation. We study the computational complexity of an array of natural decision problems about presentations of sofic shifts, such as whether a given graph presents a shift of finite type, or an irreducible shift; whether one graph presents a subshift of another; and whether a given presentation is minimal, or has a synchronizing word. Leveraging connections to automata theory, we first observe that these problems are all decidable in polynomial time when the given presentation is irreducible (strongly connected), via algorithms both known and novel to this work. For the general (reducible) case, however, we show they are all PSPACE -complete. All but one of these problems (subshift) remain polynomial-time solvable when restricting to synchronizing deterministic presentations. We also study the size of synchronizing words and synchronizing deterministic presentations.

TCS Journal 2021 Journal Article

Computational complexity of k-block conjugacy

  • Tyler Schrock
  • Rafael Frongillo

We consider several computational problems related to conjugacy between subshifts of finite type, restricted to k-block codes: verifying a proposed k-block conjugacy, deciding if two shifts admit a k-block conjugacy, and reducing the representation size of a shift via a k-block conjugacy. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for verification, and show GI - and NP -hardness for deciding conjugacy and reducing representation size, respectively. Our approach focuses on 1-block conjugacies between vertex shifts, from which we generalize to k-block conjugacies and to edge shifts. We conclude with several open problems.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Surrogate Regret Bounds for Polyhedral Losses

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Bo Waggoner

Surrogate risk minimization is an ubiquitous paradigm in supervised machine learning, wherein a target problem is solved by minimizing a surrogate loss on a dataset. Surrogate regret bounds, also called excess risk bounds, are a common tool to prove generalization rates for surrogate risk minimization. While surrogate regret bounds have been developed for certain classes of loss functions, such as proper losses, general results are relatively sparse. We provide two general results. The first gives a linear surrogate regret bound for any polyhedral (piecewise-linear and convex) surrogate, meaning that surrogate generalization rates translate directly to target rates. The second shows that for sufficiently non-polyhedral surrogates, the regret bound is a square root, meaning fast surrogate generalization rates translate to slow rates for the target. Together, these results suggest polyhedral surrogates are optimal in many cases.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Unifying lower bounds on prediction dimension of convex surrogates

  • Jessica Finocchiaro
  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Bo Waggoner

The convex consistency dimension of a supervised learning task is the lowest prediction dimension $d$ such that there exists a convex surrogate $L: \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathcal Y \to \mathbb R$ that is consistent for the given task. We present a new tool based on property elicitation, $d$-flats, for lower-bounding convex consistency dimension. This tool unifies approaches from a variety of domains, including continuous and discrete prediction problems. We use $d$-flats to obtain a new lower bound on the convex consistency dimension of risk measures, resolving an open question due to Frongillo and Kash (NeurIPS 2015). In discrete prediction settings, we show that the $d$-flats approach recovers and even tightens previous lower bounds using feasible subspace dimension.

JMLR Journal 2020 Journal Article

Memoryless Sequences for General Losses

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Andrew Nobel

One way to define the randomness of a fixed individual sequence is to ask how hard it is to predict relative to a given loss function. A sequence is memoryless if, with respect to average loss, no continuous function can predict the next entry of the sequence from a finite window of previous entries better than a constant prediction. For squared loss, memoryless sequences are known to have stochastic attributes analogous to those of truly random sequences. In this paper, we address the question of how changing the loss function changes the set of memoryless sequences, and in particular, the stochastic attributes they possess. For convex differentiable losses we establish that the statistic or property elicited by the loss determines the identity and stochastic attributes of the corresponding memoryless sequences. We generalize these results to convex non-differentiable losses, under additional assumptions, and to non-convex Bregman divergences. In particular, our results show that any Bregman divergence has the same set of memoryless sequences as squared loss. We apply our results to price calibration in prediction markets. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2020. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

An Embedding Framework for Consistent Polyhedral Surrogates

  • Jessica Finocchiaro
  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Bo Waggoner

We formalize and study the natural approach of designing convex surrogate loss functions via embeddings for problems such as classification or ranking. In this approach, one embeds each of the finitely many predictions (e. g. classes) as a point in \reals^d, assigns the original loss values to these points, and convexifies the loss in some way to obtain a surrogate. We prove that this approach is equivalent, in a strong sense, to working with polyhedral (piecewise linear convex) losses. Moreover, given any polyhedral loss L, we give a construction of a link function through which L is a consistent surrogate for the loss it embeds. We go on to illustrate the power of this embedding framework with succinct proofs of consistency or inconsistency of various polyhedral surrogates in the literature.

AAAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Partial Verification as a Substitute for Money

  • Sofia Ceppi
  • Ian Kash
  • Rafael Frongillo

Recent work shows that we can use partial verification instead of money to implement truthful mechanisms. In this paper we develop tools to answer the following question. Given an allocation rule that can be made truthful with payments, what is the minimal verification needed to make it truthful without them? Our techniques leverage the geometric relationship between the type space and the set of possible allocations.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Bounded-Loss Private Prediction Markets

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Bo Waggoner

Prior work has investigated variations of prediction markets that preserve participants' (differential) privacy, which formed the basis of useful mechanisms for purchasing data for machine learning objectives. Such markets required potentially unlimited financial subsidy, however, making them impractical. In this work, we design an adaptively-growing prediction market with a bounded financial subsidy, while achieving privacy, incentives to produce accurate predictions, and precision in the sense that market prices are not heavily impacted by the added privacy-preserving noise. We briefly discuss how our mechanism can extend to the data-purchasing setting, and its relationship to traditional learning algorithms.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Convex Elicitation of Continuous Properties

  • Jessica Finocchiaro
  • Rafael Frongillo

A property or statistic of a distribution is said to be elicitable if it can be expressed as the minimizer of some loss function in expectation. Recent work shows that continuous real-valued properties are elicitable if and only if they are identifiable, meaning the set of distributions with the same property value can be described by linear constraints. From a practical standpoint, one may ask for which such properties do there exist convex loss functions. In this paper, in a finite-outcome setting, we show that in fact every elicitable real-valued property can be elicited by a convex loss function. Our proof is constructive, and leads to convex loss functions for new properties.

AAAI Conference 2016 Conference Paper

A Geometric Method to Construct Minimal Peer Prediction Mechanisms

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Jens Witkowski

Minimal peer prediction mechanisms truthfully elicit private information (e. g. , opinions or experiences) from rational agents without the requirement that ground truth is eventually revealed. In this paper, we use a geometric perspective to prove that minimal peer prediction mechanisms are equivalent to power diagrams, a type of weighted Voronoi diagram. Using this characterization and results from computational geometry, we show that many of the mechanisms in the literature are unique up to affine transformations, and introduce a general method to construct new truthful mechanisms.

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Eliciting Categorical Data for Optimal Aggregation

  • Chien-Ju Ho
  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Yiling Chen

Models for collecting and aggregating categorical data on crowdsourcing platforms typically fall into two broad categories: those assuming agents honest and consistent but with heterogeneous error rates, and those assuming agents strategic and seek to maximize their expected reward. The former often leads to tractable aggregation of elicited data, while the latter usually focuses on optimal elicitation and does not consider aggregation. In this paper, we develop a Bayesian model, wherein agents have differing quality of information, but also respond to incentives. Our model generalizes both categories and enables the joint exploration of optimal elicitation and aggregation. This model enables our exploration, both analytically and experimentally, of optimal aggregation of categorical data and optimal multiple-choice interface design.

NeurIPS Conference 2015 Conference Paper

A Market Framework for Eliciting Private Data

  • Bo Waggoner
  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Jacob Abernethy

We propose a mechanism for purchasing information from a sequence of participants. The participants may simply hold data points they wish to sell, or may have more sophisticated information; either way, they are incentivized to participate as long as they believe their data points are representative or their information will improve the mechanism's future prediction on a test set. The mechanism, which draws on the principles of prediction markets, has a bounded budget and minimizes generalization error for Bregman divergence loss functions. We then show how to modify this mechanism to preserve the privacy of participants' information: At any given time, the current prices and predictions of the mechanism reveal almost no information about any one participant, yet in total over all participants, information is accurately aggregated.

NeurIPS Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Convergence Analysis of Prediction Markets via Randomized Subspace Descent

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Mark Reid

Prediction markets are economic mechanisms for aggregating information about future events through sequential interactions with traders. The pricing mechanisms in these markets are known to be related to optimization algorithms in machine learning and through these connections we have some understanding of how equilibrium market prices relate to the beliefs of the traders in a market. However, little is known about rates and guarantees for the convergence of these sequential mechanisms, and two recent papers cite this as an important open question. In this paper we show how some previously studied prediction market trading models can be understood as a natural generalization of randomized coordinate descent which we call randomized subspace descent (RSD). We establish convergence rates for RSD and leverage them to prove rates for the two prediction market models above, answering the open questions. Our results extend beyond standard centralized markets to arbitrary trade networks.

AAAI Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Elicitation for Aggregation

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Yiling Chen
  • Ian Kash

We study the problem of eliciting and aggregating probabilistic information from multiple agents. In order to successfully aggregate the predictions of agents, the principal needs to elicit some notion of confidence from agents, capturing how much experience or knowledge led to their predictions. To formalize this, we consider a principal who wishes to learn the distribution of a random variable. A group of Bayesian agents has each privately observed some independent samples of the random variable. The principal wishes to elicit enough information from each agent, so that her posterior is the same as if she had directly received all of the samples herself. Leveraging techniques from Bayesian statistics, we represent confidence as the number of samples an agent has observed, which is quantified by a hyperparameter from a conjugate family of prior distributions. This then allows us to show that if the principal has access to a few samples, she can achieve her aggregation goal by eliciting predictions from agents using proper scoring rules. In particular, with access to one sample, she can successfully aggregate the agents’ predictions if and only if every posterior predictive distribution corresponds to a unique value of the hyperparameter, a property which holds for many common distributions of interest. When this uniqueness property does not hold, we construct a novel and intuitive mechanism where a principal with two samples can elicit and optimally aggregate the agents’ predictions.

NeurIPS Conference 2015 Conference Paper

On Elicitation Complexity

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Ian Kash

Elicitation is the study of statistics or properties which are computable via empirical risk minimization. While several recent papers have approached the general question of which properties are elicitable, we suggest that this is the wrong question---all properties are elicitable by first eliciting the entire distribution or data set, and thus the important question is how elicitable. Specifically, what is the minimum number of regression parameters needed to compute the property? Building on previous work, we introduce a new notion of elicitation complexity and lay the foundations for a calculus of elicitation. We establish several general results and techniques for proving upper and lower bounds on elicitation complexity. These results provide tight bounds for eliciting the Bayes risk of any loss, a large class of properties which includes spectral risk measures and several new properties of interest.

NeurIPS Conference 2013 Conference Paper

How to Hedge an Option Against an Adversary: Black-Scholes Pricing is Minimax Optimal

  • Jacob Abernethy
  • Peter Bartlett
  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Andre Wibisono

We consider a popular problem in finance, option pricing, through the lens of an online learning game between Nature and an Investor. In the Black-Scholes option pricing model from 1973, the Investor can continuously hedge the risk of an option by trading the underlying asset, assuming that the asset's price fluctuates according to Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM). We consider a worst-case model, in which Nature chooses a sequence of price fluctuations under a cumulative quadratic volatility constraint, and the Investor can make a sequence of hedging decisions. Our main result is to show that the value of our proposed game, which is the regret'' of hedging strategy, converges to the Black-Scholes option price. We use significantly weaker assumptions than previous work---for instance, we allow large jumps in the asset price---and show that the Black-Scholes hedging strategy is near-optimal for the Investor even in this non-stochastic framework. "

NeurIPS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Interpreting prediction markets: a stochastic approach

  • Rafael Frongillo
  • Nicholás Della Penna
  • Mark Reid

We strengthen recent connections between prediction markets and learning by showing that a natural class of market makers can be understood as performing stochastic mirror descent when trader demands are sequentially drawn from a fixed distribution. This provides new insights into how market prices (and price paths) may be interpreted as a summary of the market's belief distribution by relating them to the optimization problem being solved. In particular, we show that the stationary point of the stochastic process of prices generated by the market is equal to the market's Walrasian equilibrium of classic market analysis. Together, these results suggest how traditional market making mechanisms might be replaced with general purpose learning algorithms while still retaining guarantees about their behaviour.

NeurIPS Conference 2011 Conference Paper

A Collaborative Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Prediction Problems

  • Jacob Abernethy
  • Rafael Frongillo

Machine Learning competitions such as the Netflix Prize have proven reasonably successful as a method of “crowdsourcing” prediction tasks. But these compe- titions have a number of weaknesses, particularly in the incentive structure they create for the participants. We propose a new approach, called a Crowdsourced Learning Mechanism, in which participants collaboratively “learn” a hypothesis for a given prediction task. The approach draws heavily from the concept of a prediction market, where traders bet on the likelihood of a future event. In our framework, the mechanism continues to publish the current hypothesis, and par- ticipants can modify this hypothesis by wagering on an update. The critical in- centive property is that a participant will profit an amount that scales according to how much her update improves performance on a released test set.

v2026.09.13