Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Qingxiu Dong

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

9 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

9

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

RICo: Refined In-Context Contribution for Automatic Instruction-Tuning Data Selection

  • Yixin Yang
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Linli Yao
  • Fangwei Zhu
  • Weilin Luo
  • Bin Wang
  • Zhifang Sui

Data selection for instruction tuning is crucial for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) while reducing training costs. In this paper, we propose Refined Contribution Measurement with In-Context Learning (RICo), a novel gradient-free method that quantifies the fine-grained contribution of individual samples to both task-level and global-level model performance. RICo enables more accurate identification of high-contribution data, leading to better instruction tuning. We also introduce a lightweight selection paradigm trained on RICo scores, enabling scalable data selection with strictly linear inference complexity. Extensive experiments on 3 LLMs across 12 benchmarks and 5 pairwise evaluation sets demonstrate the effectiveness of RICo. Remarkably, on LLaMA3.1-8B, models trained in 15% of RICo-selected data outperform full datasets by 5.42 percentage points and exceed the best performance of widely used selection methods by 1.48 percentage points. We further analyze high-contribution samples selected by RICo, which show both diverse tasks and appropriate difficulty levels, rather than merely the most difficult cases.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Data Selection via Optimal Control for Language Models

  • Yuxian Gu
  • Li Dong 0004
  • Hongning Wang
  • Yaru Hao
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Furu Wei
  • Minlie Huang

This work investigates the selection of high-quality pre-training data from massive corpora to enhance LMs' capabilities for downstream usage. We formulate data selection as a generalized Optimal Control problem, which can be solved theoretically by Pontryagin's Maximum Principle (PMP), yielding a set of necessary conditions that characterize the relationship between optimal data selection and LM training dynamics. Based on these theoretical results, we introduce **P**MP-based **D**ata **S**election (**PDS**), a framework that approximates optimal data selection by solving the PMP conditions. In our experiments, we adopt PDS to select data from CommmonCrawl and show that the PDS-selected corpus accelerates the learning of LMs and constantly boosts their performance on a wide range of downstream tasks across various model sizes. Moreover, the benefits of PDS extend to ~400B models trained on ~10T tokens, as evidenced by the extrapolation of the test loss curves according to the Scaling Laws. PDS also improves data utilization when the pre-training data is limited, by reducing the data demand by 1.8 times, which helps mitigate the quick exhaustion of available web-crawled corpora. Our code, model, and data can be found at https://github.com/microsoft/LMOps/tree/main/data_selection.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language Models

  • Bofei Gao
  • Feifan Song 0001
  • Zhe Yang 0013
  • Zefan Cai
  • Yibo Miao
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Lei Li 0039
  • Chenghao Ma

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54% and 52.55% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Reward Reasoning Models

  • Jiaxin Guo
  • Zewen Chi
  • Li Dong
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Xun Wu
  • Shaohan Huang
  • Furu Wei

Reward models play a critical role in guiding large language models toward outputs that align with human expectations. However, an open challenge remains in effectively utilizing test-time compute to enhance reward model performance. In this work, we introduce Reward Reasoning Models (RRMs), which are specifically designed to execute a deliberate reasoning process before generating final rewards. Through chain-of-thought reasoning, RRMs leverage additional test-time compute for complex queries where appropriate rewards are not immediately apparent. To develop RRMs, we implement a reinforcement learning framework that fosters self-evolved reward reasoning capabilities without requiring explicit reasoning traces as training data. Experimental results demonstrate that RRMs achieve superior performance on reward modeling benchmarks across diverse domains. Notably, we show that RRMs can adaptively exploit test-time compute to further improve reward accuracy. The pretrained models are available at https: //huggingface. co/Reward-Reasoning.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference Data

  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Li Dong 0004
  • Xingxing Zhang 0002
  • Zhifang Sui
  • Furu Wei

Through alignment with human preferences, Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced significantly in generating honest, harmless, and helpful responses. However, collecting high-quality preference data is a resource-intensive and creativity-demanding process, especially for the continual improvement of LLMs. We introduce SynPO, a self-boosting paradigm that leverages synthetic preference data for model alignment. SynPO employs an iterative mechanism wherein a self-prompt generator creates diverse prompts, and a response improver refines model responses progressively. This approach trains LLMs to autonomously learn the generative rewards for their own outputs and eliminates the need for large-scale annotation of prompts and human preferences. After four SynPO iterations, Llama3-8B and Mistral-7B show significant enhancements in instruction-following abilities, achieving over 22.1% win rate improvements on AlpacaEval 2.0 and ArenaHard. Simultaneously, SynPO improves the general performance of LLMs on various tasks, validated by a 3.2 to 5.0 average score increase on the well-recognized Open LLM leaderboard.

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Models

  • Haoran Li
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Zhengyang Tang
  • Chaojun Wang
  • Xingxing Zhang
  • Haoyang Huang
  • Shaohan Huang
  • Xiaolong Huang

We introduce Generalized Instruction Tuning (called GLAN), a general and scalable method for instruction tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike prior work that relies on seed examples or existing datasets to construct instruction-tuning data, GLAN exclusively utilizes a pre-curated taxonomy of human knowledge and capabilities as input and generates large-scale synthetic instruction data across all disciplines. Specifically, inspired by the systematic structure in human education system, we build the taxonomy by decomposing human knowledge and capabilities to various fields, sub-fields and ultimately, distinct disciplines semi-automatically, facilitated by LLMs. Subsequently, we generate a comprehensive list of subjects for every discipline and proceed to design a syllabus tailored to each subject, again utilizing LLMs. With the fine-grained key concepts detailed in every class session of the syllabus, we are able to generate diverse instructions with a broad coverage across the entire spectrum of human knowledge and skills. Extensive experiments on large language models (e.g., Mistral) demonstrate that GLAN excels in multiple dimensions from mathematical reasoning, coding, academic exams, logical reasoning to general instruction following without using task-specific training data of these tasks. In addition, GLAN allows for easy customization and new fields or skills can be added by simply incorporating a new node into our taxonomy. While promising, our approach may inherit biases or inaccuracies from LLM-generated data as in other synthetic data work and is primarily evaluated on exam-style benchmarks. Broader evaluations and data quality control are left for future work.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Think Only When You Need with Large Hybrid-Reasoning Models

  • Lingjie Jiang
  • Xun Wu
  • Shaohan Huang
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Zewen Chi
  • Li Dong
  • Xingxing Zhang
  • Tengchao Lv

Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown substantially improved reasoning capabilities over traditional Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating extended thinking processes prior to producing final responses. However, excessively lengthy thinking introduces substantial overhead in terms of token consumption and latency, which is unnecessary for simple queries. In this work, we introduce Large Hybrid-Reasoning Models (LHRMs), the first kind of model capable of adaptively determining whether to perform reasoning based on the contextual information of user queries. To achieve this, we propose a two-stage training pipeline comprising Hybrid Fine-Tuning (HFT) as a cold start, followed by online reinforcement learning with the proposed Hybrid Group Policy Optimization (HGPO) to implicitly learn to select the appropriate reasoning mode. Furthermore, we introduce a metric called Hybrid Accuracy to quantitatively assess the model’s capability for hybrid reasoning. Extensive experimental results show that LHRMs can adaptively perform hybrid reasoning on queries of varying difficulty and type. It outperforms existing LRMs and LLMs in reasoning and general capabilities while significantly improving efficiency. Together, our work advocates for a reconsideration of the appropriate use of extended reasoning processes and provides a solid starting point for building hybrid reasoning systems.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Statistical Knowledge Assessment for Large Language Models

  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Jingjing Xu
  • Lingpeng Kong
  • Zhifang Sui
  • Lei Li

Given varying prompts regarding a factoid question, can a large language model (LLM) reliably generate factually correct answers? Existing LLMs may generate distinct responses for different prompts. In this paper, we study the problem of quantifying knowledge contained in an LLM regarding a given set of facts. We propose KaRR, a statistical approach to assess factual knowledge for LLMs. The main idea is to estimate the ratio of LLM generating text corresponding to the answer entity given diverse prompts of the subject and the querying relation, versus it generating by random chances. Our assessment suite contains a comprehensive set of 994, 123 entities and 600 relations, with 1, 395, 905 text aliases. We use our method to evaluate 20 LLMs of various sizes, including LLaMA, Alpaca, OPT, etc. Experiments show that our results have a strong correlation (0. 43 Kendall's $\tau$) with the results of human assessment on LLMs. Our results reveal that the knowledge in LLMs with the same backbone architecture adheres to the scaling law, while tuning on instruction-following data sometimes compromises the model's capability to generate factually correct text reliably.

IJCAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Robust Fine-tuning via Perturbation and Interpolation from In-batch Instances

  • Shoujie Tong
  • Qingxiu Dong
  • Damai Dai
  • Yifan Song
  • Tianyu Liu
  • Baobao Chang
  • Zhifang Sui

Fine-tuning pretrained language models (PLMs) on downstream tasks has become common practice in natural language processing. However, most of the PLMs are vulnerable, e. g. , they are brittle under adversarial attacks or imbalanced data, which hinders the application of the PLMs on some downstream tasks, especially in safe-critical scenarios. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective fine-tuning method called Match-Tuning to force the PLMs to be more robust. For each instance in a batch, we involve other instances in the same batch to interact with it. To be specific, regarding the instances with other labels as a perturbation, Match-Tuning makes the model more robust to noise at the beginning of training. While nearing the end, Match-Tuning focuses more on performing an interpolation among the instances with the same label for better generalization. Extensive experiments on various tasks in GLUE benchmark show that Match-Tuning consistently outperforms the vanilla fine-tuning by 1. 64 scores. Moreover, Match-Tuning exhibits remarkable robustness to adversarial attacks and data imbalance.

v2026.09.13