Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Pritish Kamath

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

30 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

30

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Empirical Privacy Variance

  • Yuzheng Hu
  • Fan Wu 0011
  • Ruicheng Xian
  • Yuhang Liu
  • Lydia Zakynthinou
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Chiyuan Zhang
  • David A. Forsyth

We propose the notion of empirical privacy variance and study it in the context of differentially private fine-tuning of language models. Specifically, we show that models calibrated to the same $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP guarantee using DP-SGD with different hyperparameter configurations can exhibit significant variations in empirical privacy, which we quantify through the lens of memorization. We investigate the generality of this phenomenon across multiple dimensions and discuss why it is surprising and relevant. Through regression analysis, we examine how individual and composite hyperparameters influence empirical privacy. The results reveal a no-free-lunch trade-off: existing practices of hyperparameter tuning in DP-SGD, which focus on optimizing utility under a fixed privacy budget, often come at the expense of empirical privacy. To address this, we propose refined heuristics for hyperparameter selection that explicitly account for empirical privacy, showing that they are both precise and practically useful. Finally, we take preliminary steps to understand empirical privacy variance. We propose two hypotheses, identify limitations in existing techniques like privacy auditing, and outline open questions for future research.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Ex-Post Guarantee

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Alexander Knop
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Chiyuan Zhang

The conventional approach in differential privacy (DP) literature formulates the privacy-utility tradeoff with a "privacy-first" perspective: for a predetermined level of privacy, a certain utility is achievable. However, practitioners often operate under a "utility-first" paradigm, prioritizing a desired level of utility and then determining the corresponding privacy cost. Wu et al. [2019] initiated a formal study of this ``utility-first'' perspective by introducing ex-post DP. They demonstrated that by adding correlated Laplace noise and progressively reducing it on demand, a sequence of increasingly accurate estimates of a private parameter can be generated, with the privacy cost attributed only to the least noisy iterate released. This led to a Laplace mechanism variant that achieves a specified utility with minimal privacy loss. However, their work, and similar findings by Whitehouse et al. [2023], are primarily limited to simple mechanisms based on Laplace or Gaussian noise. In this paper, we significantly generalize these results. In particular, we extend the findings of Wu et al. [2019] and Liu and Talwar [2019] to support any sequence of private estimators, incurring at most a doubling of the original privacy budget. Furthermore, we demonstrate that hyperparameter tuning for these estimators, including the selection of an optimal privacy budget, can be performed without additional privacy cost. Finally, we extend our results to ex-post R\'{e}nyi DP, further broadening the applicability of utility-first privacy mechanisms.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Scaling Embedding Layers in Language Models

  • Da Yu
  • Edith Cohen
  • Badih Ghazi
  • Yangsibo Huang
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Daogao Liu
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We propose SCONE (**S**calable, **C**ontextualized, **O**ffloaded, **N**-gram **E**mbedding), a new method for extending input embedding layers to enhance language model performance. To avoid increased decoding costs, SCONE retains the original vocabulary while introducing embeddings for a set of frequent $n$-grams. These embeddings provide contextualized representation for each input token and are learned with a separate model during training. After training, embeddings are precomputed and stored in off-accelerator memory; during inference, querying them has minimal impact on latency due to the low complexity of embedding lookups. SCONE enables two new scaling strategies: increasing the number of $n$-gram embeddings and scaling the model used to learn them, both while maintaining fixed accelerator usage during inference (in terms of FLOPS and memory). We show that scaling both aspects enables a model with 1B accelerator-resident parameters to outperform a 1. 9B-parameter baseline across diverse corpora, while using only about half the FLOPS and accelerator memory during inference.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy

  • Yangsibo Huang
  • Daogao Liu
  • Lynn Chua
  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Milad Nasr

Machine unlearning algorithms, designed for selective removal of training data from models, have emerged as a promising approach to growing privacy concerns. In this work, we expose a critical yet underexplored vulnerability in the deployment of unlearning systems: the assumption that the data requested for removal is always part of the original training set. We present a threat model where an attacker can degrade model accuracy by submitting adversarial unlearning requests for data \textit{not} present in the training set. We propose white-box and black-box attack algorithms and evaluate them through a case study on image classification tasks using the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, targeting a family of widely used unlearning methods. Our results show extremely poor test accuracy following the attack—3.6% on CIFAR-10 and 0.4% on ImageNet for white-box attacks, and 8.5% on CIFAR-10 and 1.3% on ImageNet for black-box attacks. Additionally, we evaluate various verification mechanisms to detect the legitimacy of unlearning requests and reveal the challenges in verification, as most of the mechanisms fail to detect stealthy attacks without severely impairing their ability to process valid requests. These findings underscore the urgent need for research on more robust request verification methods and unlearning protocols, should the deployment of machine unlearning systems become more prevalent in the future.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Differentially Private Optimization with Sparse Gradients

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Cristóbal Guzmán
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi

Motivated by applications of large embedding models, we study differentially private (DP) optimization problems under sparsity of individual gradients. We start with new near-optimal bounds for the classic mean estimation problem but with sparse data, improving upon existing algorithms particularly for the high-dimensional regime. The corresponding lower bounds are based on a novel block-diagonal construction that is combined with existing DP mean estimation lower bounds. Next, we obtain pure- and approximate-DP algorithms with almost optimal rates for stochastic convex optimization with sparse gradients; the former represents the first nearly dimension-independent rates for this problem. Furthermore, by introducing novel analyses of bias reduction in mean estimation and randomly-stopped biased SGD we obtain nearly dimension-independent rates for near-stationary points for the empirical risk in nonconvex settings under approximate-DP.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?

  • Lynn Chua
  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Amer Sinha
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We demonstrate a substantial gap between the privacy guarantees of the Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism under different types of batch sampling: (i) Shuffling, and (ii) Poisson subsampling; the typical analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) follows by interpreting it as a post-processing of ABLQ. While shuffling-based DP-SGD is more commonly used in practical implementations, it has not been amenable to easy privacy analysis, either analytically or even numerically. On the other hand, Poisson subsampling-based DP-SGD is challenging to scalably implement, but has a well-understood privacy analysis, with multiple open-source numerically tight privacy accountants available. This has led to a common practice of using shuffling-based DP-SGD in practice, but using the privacy analysis for the corresponding Poisson subsampling version. Our result shows that there can be a substantial gap between the privacy analysis when using the two types of batch sampling, and thus advises caution in reporting privacy parameters for DP-SGD.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Adam Sealfon

In this work, we give a new technique for analyzing individualized privacy accounting via the following simple observation: if an algorithm is one-sided add-DP, then its subsampled variant satisfies two-sided DP. From this, we obtain several improved algorithms for private combinatorial optimization problems, including decomposable submodular maximization and set cover. Our error guarantees are asymptotically tight and our algorithm satisfies pure-DP while previously known algorithms (Gupta et al. , 2010; Chaturvedi et al. , 2021) are approximate-DP. We also show an application of our technique beyond combinatorial optimization by giving a pure-DP algorithm for the shifting heavy hitter problem in a stream; previously, only an approximate-DP algorithm was known (Kaplan et al. , 2021; Cohen & Lyu, 2023).

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

LabelDP-Pro: Learning with Label Differential Privacy via Projections

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Yangsibo Huang
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Chiyuan Zhang

Label differentially private (label DP) algorithms seek to preserve the privacy of the labels in a training dataset in settings where the features are known to the adversary. In this work, we study a new family of label DP training algorithms. Unlike most prior label DP algorithms that have been based on label randomization, our algorithm naturally leverages the power of the central model of DP. It interleaves gradient projection operations with private stochastic gradient descent steps in order to improve the utility of the trained model while guaranteeing the privacy of the labels. We show that such projection-based algorithms can be made practical and that they improve on the state-of-the art for label DP training in the high-privacy regime. We complement our empirical evaluation with theoretical results shedding light on the efficacy of our method through the lens of bias-variance trade-offs.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling

  • Lynn Chua
  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Amer Sinha
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We provide new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of multi-epoch Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism with shuffled batch sampling, demonstrating substantial gaps when compared to Poisson subsampling; prior analysis was limited to a single epoch. Since the privacy analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is obtained by analyzing the ABLQ mechanism, this brings into serious question the common practice of implementing Shuffling based DP-SGD, but reporting privacy parameters as if Poisson subsampling was used. To understand the impact of this gap on the utility of trained machine learning models, we introduce a novel practical approach to implement Poisson subsampling at scale using massively parallel computation, and efficiently train models with the same. We provide a comparison between the utility of models trained with Poisson subsampling based DP-SGD, and the optimistic estimates of utility when using shuffling, via our new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of ABLQ with shuffling.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Adam Sealfon

We study the problem of computing pairwise statistics, i. e. , ones of the form $\binom{n}{2}^{-1} \sum_{i \ne j} f(x_i, x_j)$, where $x_i$ denotes the input to the $i$th user, with differential privacy (DP) in the local model. This formulation captures important metrics such as Kendall's $\tau$ coefficient, Area Under Curve, Gini's mean difference, Gini's entropy, etc. We give several novel and generic algorithms for the problem, leveraging techniques from DP algorithms for linear queries.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

On User-Level Private Convex Optimization

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Raghu Meka
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We introduce a new mechanism for stochastic convex optimization (SCO) with user-level differential privacy guarantees. The convergence rates of this mechanism are similar to those in the prior work of Levy et al. 2021 and Narayanan et al. 2022, but with two important improvements. Our mechanism does not require any smoothness assumptions on the loss. Furthermore, our bounds are also the first where the minimum number of users needed for user-level privacy has no dependence on the dimension and only a logarithmic dependence on the desired excess error. The main idea underlying the new mechanism is to show that the optimizers of strongly convex losses have low local deletion sensitivity, along with a new output perturbation method for functions with low local deletion sensitivity, which could be of independent interest.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy

  • Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru Varadaraja
  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Ethan Leeman
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Avinash V Varadarajan
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We propose a new family of label randomizers for training regression models under the constraint of label differential privacy (DP). In particular, we leverage the trade-offs between bias and variance to construct better label randomizers depending on a privately estimated prior distribution over the labels. We demonstrate that these randomizers achieve state-of-the-art privacy-utility trade-offs on several datasets, highlighting the importance of reducing bias when training neural networks with label DP. We also provide theoretical results shedding light on the structural properties of the optimal unbiased randomizers.

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Regression with Label Differential Privacy

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Ethan Leeman
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Avinash V. Varadarajan
  • Chiyuan Zhang

We study the task of training regression models with the guarantee of _label_ differential privacy (DP). Based on a global prior distribution of label values, which could be obtained privately, we derive a label DP randomization mechanism that is optimal under a given regression loss function. We prove that the optimal mechanism takes the form of a "randomized response on bins", and propose an efficient algorithm for finding the optimal bin values. We carry out a thorough experimental evaluation on several datasets demonstrating the efficacy of our algorithm.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Sparsity-Preserving Differentially Private Training of Large Embedding Models

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Yangsibo Huang
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Amer Sinha
  • Chiyuan Zhang

As the use of large embedding models in recommendation systems and language applications increases, concerns over user data privacy have also risen. DP-SGD, a training algorithm that combines differential privacy with stochastic gradient descent, has been the workhorse in protecting user privacy without compromising model accuracy by much. However, applying DP-SGD naively to embedding models can destroy gradient sparsity, leading to reduced training efficiency. To address this issue, we present two new algorithms, DP-FEST and DP-AdaFEST, that preserve gradient sparsity during the private training of large embedding models. Our algorithms achieve substantial reductions ($10^6 \times$) in gradient size, while maintaining comparable levels of accuracy, on benchmark real-world datasets.

FOCS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Towards Separating Computational and Statistical Differential Privacy

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Rahul Ilango
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi

Computational differential privacy (CDP) is a natural relaxation of the standard notion of (statistical) differential privacy (SDP) proposed by Beimel, Nissim, and Omri (CRYPTO 2008) and Mironov, Pandey, Reingold, and Vadhan (CRYPTO 2009). In contrast to SDP, CDP only requires privacy guarantees to hold against computationally-bounded adversaries rather than computationally-unbounded statistical adversaries. Despite the question being raised explicitly in several works (e. g. , Bun, Chen, and Vadhan, TCC 2016), it has remained tantalizingly open whether there is any task achievable with the CDP notion but not the SDP notion. Even a candidate such task is unknown. Indeed, it is even unclear what the truth could be! In this work, we give the first construction of a task achievable with the CDP notion but not the SDP notion, under the following strong but plausible cryptographic assumptions: •Non-Interactive Witness Indistinguishable Proofs, •Laconic Collision-Resistant Keyless Hash Functions, •Differing-Inputs Obfuscation for Public-Coin Samplers. In particular, we construct a task for which there exists an $\varepsilon$-CDP mechanism with $\varepsilon=O(1)$ achieving $1-o(1)$ utility, but any $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-SDP mechanism, including computationally-unbounded ones, that achieves a constant utility must use either a super-constant $\varepsilon$ or an inverse-polynomially large $\delta$. To prove this, we introduce a new approach for showing that a mechanism satisfies CDP: first we show that a mechanism is “private” against a certain class of decision tree adversaries, and then we use cryptographic constructions to “lift” this into privacy against computationally bounded adversaries. We believe this approach could be useful to devise further tasks separating CDP from SDP.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per User

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi
  • Raghu Meka
  • Chiyuan Zhang

Previous work on user-level differential privacy (DP) [Ghazi et al. NeurIPS 2021, Bun et al. STOC 2023] obtained generic algorithms that work for various learning tasks. However, their focus was on the *example-rich* regime, where the users have so many examples that each user could themselves solve the problem. In this work we consider the *example-scarce* regime, where each user has only a few examples, and obtain the following results: * For approximate-DP, we give a generic transformation of any item-level DP algorithm to a user-level DP algorithm. Roughly speaking, the latter gives a (multiplicative) savings of $O_{\varepsilon, \delta}(\sqrt{m})$ in terms of the number of users required for achieving the same utility, where $m$ is the number of examples per user. This algorithm, while recovering most known bounds for specific problems, also gives new bounds, e. g. , for PAC learning. * For pure-DP, we present a simple technique for adapting the exponential mechanism [McSherry & Talwar, FOCS 2007] to the user-level setting. This gives new bounds for a variety of tasks, such as private PAC learning, hypothesis selection, and distribution learning. For some of these problems, we show that our bounds are near-optimal.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy Models

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi

We study the problem of privately computing the $\mbox{\it anonymized histogram}$ (a. k. a. $\mbox{\it unattributed histogram}$), which is defined as the histogram without item labels. Previous works have provided algorithms with $\ell_1$- and $\ell_2^2$-errors of $O_\varepsilon(\sqrt{n})$ in the central model of differential privacy (DP). In this work, we provide an algorithm with a nearly matching error guarantee of $\widetilde{O}_\varepsilon(\sqrt{n})$ in the shuffle DP and pan-private models. Our algorithm is very simple: it just post-processes the discrete Laplace-noised histogram! Using this algorithm as a subroutine, we show applications in privately estimating symmetric properties of distributions such as entropy, support coverage, and support size.

STOC Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Circuits resilient to short-circuit errors

  • Klim Efremenko
  • Bernhard Haeupler
  • Yael Tauman Kalai
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Gillat Kol
  • Nicolas Resch
  • Raghuvansh R. Saxena

Given a Boolean circuit C , we wish to convert it to a circuit C ′ that computes the same function as C even if some of its gates suffer from adversarial short circuit errors, i.e., their output is replaced by the value of one of their inputs. Can we design such a resilient circuit C ′ whose size is roughly comparable to that of C ? Prior work gave a positive answer for the special case where C is a formula.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt In Contrastive Learning?

  • Pranjal Awasthi
  • Nishanth Dikkala
  • Pritish Kamath

Recent investigations in noise contrastive estimation suggest, both empirically as well as theoretically, that while having more “negative samples” in the contrastive loss improves downstream classification performance initially, beyond a threshold, it hurts downstream performance due to a “collision-coverage” trade-off. But is such a phenomenon inherent in contrastive learning? We show in a simple theoretical setting, where positive pairs are generated by sampling from the underlying latent class (introduced by Saunshi et al. (ICML 2019)), that the downstream performance of the representation optimizing the (population) contrastive loss in fact does not degrade with the number of negative samples. Along the way, we give a structural characterization of the optimal representation in our framework, for noise contrastive estimation. We also provide empirical support for our theoretical results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Faster Privacy Accounting via Evolving Discretization

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar 0001
  • Pasin Manurangsi

We introduce a new algorithm for numerical composition of privacy random variables, useful for computing the accurate differential privacy parameters for compositions of mechanisms. Our algorithm achieves a running time and memory usage of $polylog(k)$ for the task of self-composing a mechanism, from a broad class of mechanisms, $k$ times; this class, e. g. , includes the sub-sampled Gaussian mechanism, that appears in the analysis of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). By comparison, recent work by Gopi et al. (NeurIPS 2021) has obtained a running time of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$ for the same task. Our approach extends to the case of composing $k$ different mechanisms in the same class, improving upon the running time and memory usage in their work from $\widetilde{O}(k^{1. 5})$ to $\wtilde{O}(k)$.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Private Isotonic Regression

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Ravi Kumar
  • Pasin Manurangsi

In this paper, we consider the problem of differentially private (DP) algorithms for isotonic regression. For the most general problem of isotonic regression over a partially ordered set (poset) $\mathcal{X}$ and for any Lipschitz loss function, we obtain a pure-DP algorithm that, given $n$ input points, has an expected excess empirical risk of roughly $\mathrm{width}(\mathcal{X}) \cdot \log|\mathcal{X}| / n$, where $\mathrm{width}(\mathcal{X})$ is the width of the poset. In contrast, we also obtain a near-matching lower bound of roughly $(\mathrm{width}(\mathcal{X}) + \log |\mathcal{X}|) / n$, that holds even for approximate-DP algorithms. Moreover, we show that the above bounds are essentially the best that can be obtained without utilizing any further structure of the poset. In the special case of a totally ordered set and for $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2^2$ losses, our algorithm can be implemented in near-linear running time; we also provide extensions of this algorithm to the problem of private isotonic regression with additional structural constraints on the output function.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Understanding the Eluder Dimension

  • Gene Li
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Dylan J Foster
  • Nati Srebro

We provide new insights on eluder dimension, a complexity measure that has been extensively used to bound the regret of algorithms for online bandits and reinforcement learning with function approximation. First, we study the relationship between the eluder dimension for a function class and a generalized notion of \emph{rank}, defined for any monotone ``activation'' $\sigma: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$, which corresponds to the minimal dimension required to represent the class as a generalized linear model. It is known that when $\sigma$ has derivatives bounded away from $0$, $\sigma$-rank gives rise to an upper bound on eluder dimension for any function class; we show however that eluder dimension can be exponentially smaller than $\sigma$-rank. We also show that the condition on the derivative is necessary; namely, when $\sigma$ is the $\mathsf{relu}$ activation, the eluder dimension can be exponentially larger than $\sigma$-rank. For Boolean-valued function classes, we obtain a characterization of the eluder dimension in terms of star number and threshold dimension, quantities which are relevant in active learning and online learning respectively.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

On the Power of Differentiable Learning versus PAC and SQ Learning

  • Emmanuel Abbe
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Eran Malach
  • Colin Sandon
  • Nathan Srebro

We study the power of learning via mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on the loss of a differentiable model or neural network, and ask what learning problems can be learnt using this paradigm. We show that SGD can always simulate learning with statistical queries (SQ), but its ability to go beyond that depends on the precision $\rho$ of the gradients and the minibatch size $b$. With fine enough precision relative to minibatch size, namely when $b \rho$ is small enough, SGD can go beyond SQ learning and simulate any sample-based learning algorithm and thus its learning power is equivalent to that of PAC learning; this extends prior work that achieved this result for $b=1$. Moreover, with polynomially many bits of precision (i. e. when $\rho$ is exponentially small), SGD can simulate PAC learning regardless of the batch size. On the other hand, when $b \rho^2$ is large enough, the power of SGD is equivalent to that of SQ learning.

ICML Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernels

  • Eran Malach
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Emmanuel Abbe
  • Nathan Srebro

We study the relative power of learning with gradient descent on differentiable models, such as neural networks, versus using the corresponding tangent kernels. We show that under certain conditions, gradient descent achieves small error only if a related tangent kernel method achieves a non-trivial advantage over random guessing (a. k. a. weak learning), though this advantage might be very small even when gradient descent can achieve arbitrarily high accuracy. Complementing this, we show that without these conditions, gradient descent can in fact learn with small error even when no kernel method, in particular using the tangent kernel, can achieve a non-trivial advantage over random guessing.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations

  • Ankit Shah
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Julie Shah
  • Shen Li

When observing task demonstrations, human apprentices are able to identify whether a given task is executed correctly long before they gain expertise in actually performing that task. Prior research into learning from demonstrations (LfD) has failed to capture this notion of the acceptability of an execution; meanwhile, temporal logics provide a flexible language for expressing task specifications. Inspired by this, we present Bayesian specification inference, a probabilistic model for inferring task specification as a temporal logic formula. We incorporate methods from probabilistic programming to define our priors, along with a domain-independent likelihood function to enable sampling-based inference. We demonstrate the efficacy of our model for inferring true specifications with over 90% similarity between the inferred specification and the ground truth, both within a synthetic domain and a real-world table setting task.

STOC Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Monotone circuit lower bounds from resolution

  • Ankit Garg 0001
  • Mika Göös
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Dmitry Sokolov 0001

For any unsatisfiable CNF formula F that is hard to refute in the Resolution proof system, we show that a gadget-composed version of F is hard to refute in any proof system whose lines are computed by efficient communication protocols—or, equivalently, that a monotone function associated with F has large monotone circuit complexity. Our result extends to monotone real circuits, which yields new lower bounds for the Cutting Planes proof system.

SODA Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Communication Complexity of Permutation-Invariant Functions

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Madhu Sudan 0001

Motivated by the quest for a broader understanding of upper bounds in communication complexity, at least for simple functions, we introduce the class of “permutation-invariant” functions. A partial function f: {0, 1} n × {0, 1} n → {0, 1, ?} is permutation-invariant if for every bijection π: {1, …, n } → {1, …, n } and every x, y ∊ {0, 1} n, it is the case that f (x, y) = f (x π, y π ). Most of the commonly studied functions in communication complexity are permutation-invariant. For such functions, we present a simple complexity measure (computable in time polynomial in n given an implicit description of f ) that describes their communication complexity up to polynomial factors and up to an additive error that is logarithmic in the input size. This gives a coarse taxonomy of the communication complexity of simple functions. Our work highlights the role of the well-known lower bounds of functions such as S et -D isjointness and I ndexing, while complementing them with the relatively lesser-known upper bounds for G ap -I nner -P roduct (from the sketching literature) and S parse -G ap -I nner -P roduct (from the recent work of Canonne et al. [ITCS 2015]). We also present consequences to the study of communication complexity with imperfectly shared randomness where we show that for total permutation-invariant functions, imperfectly shared randomness results in only a polynomial blow-up in communication complexity after an additive O (log log n ) overhead.

FOCS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Decidability of Non-interactive Simulation of Joint Distributions

  • Badih Ghazi
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Madhu Sudan 0001

We present decidability results for a sub-class of "non-interactive" simulation problems, a well-studied class of problems in information theory. A non-interactive simulation problem is specified by two distributions P(x, y) and Q(u, v): The goal is to determine if two players, Alice and Bob, that observe sequences Xn and Yn respectively where {(Xi, Yi)}ni = 1 are drawn i. i. d. from P(x, y) can generate pairs U and V respectively (without communicating with each other) with a joint distribution that is arbitrarily close in total variation to Q(u, v). Even when P and Q are extremely simple: e. g. , P is uniform on the triples (0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0) and Q is a "doubly symmetric binary source", i. e. , U and V are uniform ± 1 variables with correlation say 0. 49, it is open if P can simulate Q. In this work, we show that whenever P is a distribution on a finite domain and Q is a 2 × 2 distribution, then the non-interactive simulation problem is decidable: specifically, given δ > 0 the algorithm runs in time bounded by some function of P and δ and either gives a non-interactive simulation protocol that is δ-close to Q or asserts that no protocol gets O(δ)-close to Q. The main challenge to such a result is determining explicit (computable) convergence bounds on the number n of samples that need to be drawn from P(x, y) to get δ-close to Q. We invoke contemporary results from the analysis of Boolean functions such as the invariance principle and a regularity lemma to obtain such explicit bounds.

FOCS Conference 2013 Conference Paper

Arithmetic Circuits: A Chasm at Depth Three

  • Ankit Gupta 0001
  • Pritish Kamath
  • Neeraj Kayal
  • Ramprasad Saptharishi

We show that, over Q, if an n-variate polynomial of degree d = n O(1) is computable by an arithmetic circuit of size s (respectively by an arithmetic branching program of size s) then it can also be computed by a depth three circuit (i. e. a ΣΠΣ-circuit) of size exp(O(√(d log n log d log s))) (respectively of size exp(O(√(d log n log s))). In particular this yields a ΣΠΣ circuit of size exp(O(√(d log d))) computing the d × d determinant Det d. It also means that if we can prove a lower bound of exp(omega(√(d log d))) on the size of any ΣΠΣ-circuit computing the d × d permanent Perm d then we get super polynomial lower bounds for the size of any arithmetic branching program computing Perm d. We then give some further results pertaining to derandomizing polynomial identity testing and circuit lower bounds. The ΣΠΣ circuits that we construct have the property that (some of) the intermediate polynomials have degree much higher than d. Indeed such a counterintuitive construction is unavoidable - it is known that in any ΣΠΣ circuit C computing either Det d or Perm_d, if every multiplication gate has fanin at most d (or any constant multiple thereof) then C must have size at least exp(Ω(d)).

CSL Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Faster Algorithms for Alternating Refinement Relations

  • Krishnendu Chatterjee
  • Siddhesh Chaubal
  • Pritish Kamath

One central issue in the formal design and analysis of reactive systems is the notion of refinement that asks whether all behaviors of the implementation is allowed by the specification. The local interpretation of behavior leads to the notion of simulation. Alternating transition systems (ATSs) provide a general model for composite reactive systems, and the simulation relation for ATSs is known as alternating simulation. The simulation relation for fair transition systems is called fair simulation. In this work our main contributions are as follows: (1) We present an improved algorithm for fair simulation with Büchi fairness constraints; our algorithm requires O(n^3 * m) time as compared to the previous known O(n^6)-time algorithm, where n is the number of states and m is the number of transitions. (2) We present a game based algorithm for alternating simulation that requires O(m^2)-time as compared to the previous known O((n*m)^2)-time algorithm, where n is the number of states and m is the size of transition relation. (3) We present an iterative algorithm for alternating simulation that matches the time complexity of the game based algorithm, but is more space efficient than the game based algorithm.

v2026.09.13