Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Piotr Gorczyca

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Non-Monotonic S4F Standpoint Logic

  • Piotr Gorczyca
  • Hannes Strass

Standpoint logics offer unified modal logic-based formalisms for representing multiple heterogeneous viewpoints. At the same time, many non-monotonic reasoning frameworks can be naturally captured using modal logics — in particular using the modal logic S4F. In this work, we propose a novel formalism called S4F Standpoint Logic, which generalises both S4F and standpoint propositional logic and is therefore capable of expressing multi-viewpoint, non-monotonic semantic commitments. We define its syntax and semantics and analyze its computational complexity, obtaining the result that S4F Standpoint Logic is not computationally harder than its constituent logics, whether in monotonic or non-monotonic form. We also outline mechanisms for credulous and sceptical acceptance and illustrate the framework with an example.

NMR Workshop 2025 Conference Paper

ABA Disputes in ASP: Advancing Argument Games through Multi-Shot Solving

  • Martin Diller
  • Piotr Gorczyca

Argumentation games, which model reasoning as adversarial dialogue, offer intuitive and explainable mechanisms for decision-making in AI. However, their implementation has lagged behind inference-focused approaches, particularly in structured argumentation frameworks like assumption-based argumentation (ABA). This work presents, to our knowledge, the first application of multi-shot answer set programming (ASP) for implementing argument games, focusing on ABA dispute derivations. Leveraging a recent rule-based representation of ABA disputes, our method combines a declarative program with lightweight script-based control of multi-shot aspects, yielding a modular and adaptable system. We extend this core approach to support alternative games and show how it can also be used to implement argument games for Dung’s abstract argumentation formalism. Empirical results show that our implementation outperforms existing ABA dispute systems. We also introduce an approximate variant that further improves efficiency – reaching the level of the best current inference-focused ABA system – while maintaining perfect specificity (i. e. true negative rate), demonstrating the practical value of multi-shot ASP, particularly in interactive settings where explainability is key.

NMR Workshop 2024 Conference Paper

Adding Standpoint Modalities to Non-Monotonic S4F: Preliminary Results

  • Piotr Gorczyca
  • Hannes Strass

Standpoint logics allow to represent multiple heterogeneous viewpoints in a unifying framework based on modal logic. We propose to combine standpoint modalities with the single modality of the non-monotonic modal logic S4F, thus defining standpoint S4F. The resulting language allows to express semantic commitments based on default reasoning. We define syntax and semantics of the logic, study the computational complexity of reasoning problems in the fragment of simple theories, and showcase standpoint S4F by exemplifying two concrete instantiations of the general language – standpoint default logic and standpoint argumentation frameworks.