Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Pierre Clavier

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

9 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

9

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

ShiQ: Bringing back Bellman to LLMs

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Nathan Grinsztajn
  • Raphaël Avalos
  • Yannis Flet-Berliac
  • Irem Ergun
  • Omar Darwiche Domingues
  • Olivier Pietquin
  • Pierre Richemond

The fine-tuning of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using reinforcement learning (RL) is generally formulated as direct policy optimization. This approach was naturally favored as it efficiently improves a pretrained LLM with simple gradient updates. Another RL paradigm, Q-learning methods, has received far less attention in the LLM community while demonstrating major success in various non-LLM RL tasks. In particular, Q-learning effectiveness stems from its sample efficiency and ability to learn offline, which is particularly valuable given the high computational cost of sampling with LLM. However, naively applying a Q-learning–style update to the model’s logits is ineffective due to the specificity of LLMs. Our contribution is to derive theoretically grounded loss functions from Bellman equations to adapt Q-learning methods to LLMs. To do so, we interpret LLM logits as Q-values and carefully adapt insights from the RL literature to account for LLM-specific characteristics. It thereby ensures that the logits become reliable Q-value estimates. We then use this loss to build a practical algorithm, ShiQ for Shifted-Q, that supports off-policy, token-wise learning while remaining simple to implement. Finally, ShiQ is evaluated on both synthetic data and real-world benchmarks, e. g. , UltraFeedback, BFCL-V3, demonstrating its effectiveness in both single-turn and multi-turn LLM settings.

EWRL Workshop 2025 Workshop Paper

ShiQ: Bringing back Bellman to LLMs

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Nathan Grinsztajn
  • Raphaël Avalos
  • Yannis Flet-Berliac
  • Irem Ergun
  • Omar Darwiche Domingues
  • Eugene Tarassov
  • Olivier Pietquin

The fine-tuning of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using reinforcement learning (RL) is generally formulated as direct policy optimization. This approach was naturally favored as it efficiently improves a pretrained LLM, seen as an initial policy. Another RL paradigm, Q-learning methods, has received far less attention in the LLM community while demonstrating major success in various non-LLM RL tasks. In particular, Q-learning effectiveness comes from its sample efficiency and ability to learn offline, which is particularly valuable given the high computational cost of sampling with LLM. However, naively applying a Q-learning–style update to the model’s logits is ineffective due to the specificity of LLMs. Our core contribution is to derive theoretically grounded loss functions from Bellman equations to adapt Q-learning methods to LLMs. To do so, we carefully adapt insights from the RL literature to account for LLM-specific characteristics, ensuring that the logits become reliable Q-value estimates. We then use this loss to build a practical algorithm, ShiQ for Shifted-Q, that supports off-policy, token-wise learning while remaining simple to implement. Finally, we evaluate ShiQ on both synthetic data and real-world benchmarks, e. g. , UltraFeedback, BFCL-V3, demonstrating its effectiveness in both single-turn and multi-turn LLM settings.

EWRL Workshop 2024 Workshop Paper

Bootstrapping Expectiles in Reinforcement Learning

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Emmanuel Rachelson
  • Erwan Le Pennec
  • Matthieu Geist

Many classic Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms rely on a Bellman operator, which involves an expectation over the next states, leading to the concept of bootstrapping. To introduce a form of pessimism, we propose to replace this expectation with an expectile. In practice, this can be very simply done by replacing the $L_2$ loss with a more general expectile loss for the critic. Introducing pessimism in RL is desirable for various reasons, such as tackling the overestimation problem (for which classic solutions are double Q-learning or the twin-critic approach of TD3) or robust RL (where transitions are adversarial). We study empirically these two cases. For the overestimation problem, we show that the proposed approach, \texttt{ExpectRL}, provides better results than a classic twin-critic. On robust RL benchmarks, involving changes of the environment, we show that our approach is more robust than classic RL algorithms. We also introduce a variation of \texttt{ExpectRL} combined with domain randomization which is competitive with state-of-the-art robust RL agents. Eventually, we also extend \texttt{ExpectRL} with a mechanism for choosing automatically the expectile value, that is the degree of pessimism.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Near-Optimal Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with General $L_p$ Norms

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Laixi Shi
  • Erwan Le Pennec
  • Eric Mazumdar
  • Adam Wierman
  • Matthieu Geist

To address the challenges of sim-to-real gap and sample efficiency in reinforcement learning (RL), this work studies distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) --- optimize the worst-case performance when the deployed environment is within an uncertainty set around some nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs has remained largely undetermined. While the statistical implications of distributional robustness in RL have been explored in some specific cases, the generalizability of the existing findings remains unclear, especially in comparison to standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that samples from the nominal MDP, we examine the sample complexity of RMDPs using a class of generalized $L_p$ norms as the 'distance' function for the uncertainty set, under two commonly adopted $sa$-rectangular and $s$-rectangular conditions. Our results imply that RMDPs can be more sample-efficient to solve than standard MDPs using generalized $L_p$ norms in both $sa$- and $s$-rectangular cases, potentially inspiring more empirical research. We provide a near-optimal upper bound and a matching minimax lower bound for the $sa$-rectangular scenarios. For $s$-rectangular cases, we improve the state-of-the-art upper bound and also derive a lower bound using $L_\infty$ norm that verifies the tightness.

EWRL Workshop 2024 Workshop Paper

RRLS: Robust Reinforcement Learning Suite

  • Adil Zouitine
  • David Bertoin
  • Pierre Clavier
  • Matthieu Geist
  • Emmanuel Rachelson

Robust reinforcement learning is the problem of learning control policies that provide optimal worst-case performance against a span of adversarial environments. It is a crucial ingredient for deploying algorithms in real-world scenarios with prevalent environmental uncertainties and has been a long-standing object of attention in the community, without a standardized set of benchmarks. This contribution endeavors to fill this gap. We introduce the Robust Reinforcement Learning Suite (RRLS), a benchmark suite based on Mujoco environments. RRLS provides six continuous control tasks with two types of uncertainty sets for training and evaluation. Our benchmark aims to standardize robust reinforcement learning tasks, facilitating reproducible and comparable experiments, in particular those from recent state-of-the-art contributions, for which we demonstrate the use of RRLS. It is also designed to be easily expandable to new environments. The source code is available at \href{https: //anonymous. url}{https: //anonymous. url}.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Time-Constrained Robust MDPs

  • Adil Zouitine
  • David Bertoin
  • Pierre Clavier
  • Matthieu Geist
  • Emmanuel Rachelson

Robust reinforcement learning is essential for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where environmental uncertainty predominates. Traditional robust reinforcement learning often depends on rectangularity assumptions, where adverse probability measures of outcome states are assumed to be independent across different states and actions. This assumption, rarely fulfilled in practice, leads to overly conservative policies. To address this problem, we introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances, thus more accurately reflecting real-world dynamics. This formulation goes beyond the conventional rectangularity paradigm, offering new perspectives and expanding the analytical framework for robust RL. We propose three distinct algorithms, each using varying levels of environmental information, and evaluate them extensively on continuous control benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that these algorithms yield an efficient tradeoff between performance and robustness, outperforming traditional deep robust RL methods in time-constrained environments while preserving robustness in classical benchmarks. This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications.

EWRL Workshop 2024 Workshop Paper

Time-Constrained Robust MDPs

  • Adil Zouitine
  • David Bertoin
  • Pierre Clavier
  • Matthieu Geist
  • Emmanuel Rachelson

Robust reinforcement learning is essential for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where environmental uncertainty predominates. Traditional robust reinforcement learning often depends on rectangularity assumptions, where adverse probability measures of outcome states are assumed to be independent across different states and actions. This assumption, rarely fulfilled in practice, leads to overly conservative policies. To address this problem, we introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances, thus more accurately reflecting real-world dynamics. This formulation goes beyond the conventional rectangularity paradigm, offering new perspectives and expanding the analytical framework for robust RL. We propose three distinct algorithms, each using varying levels of environmental information, and evaluate them extensively on continuous control benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that these algorithms yield an efficient tradeoff between performance and robustness, outperforming traditional deep robust RL methods in time-constrained environments while preserving robustness in classical benchmarks. This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications.

UAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Towards Minimax Optimality of Model-based Robust Reinforcement Learning

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Erwan Le Pennec
  • Matthieu Geist

We study the sample complexity of obtaining an $\epsilon$-optimal policy in Robust discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), given only access to a generative model of the nominal kernel. This problem is widely studied in the non-robust case, and it is known that any planning approach applied to an empirical MDP estimated with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{H^3 |S||A|}{\epsilon^2})$ samples provides an $\epsilon$-optimal policy, which is minimax optimal. Results in the robust case are much more scarce. For $sa$- (resp $s$-) rectangular uncertainty sets, until recently the best-known sample complexity was $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{H^4 |S|^2|A|}{\epsilon^2})$ (resp. $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{H^4 | S |^2| A |^2}{\epsilon^2})$), for specific algorithms and when the uncertainty set is based on the total variation (TV), the KL or the Chi-square divergences. In this paper, we consider uncertainty sets defined with an $L_p$-ball (recovering the TV case), and study the sample complexity of any planning algorithm (with high accuracy guarantee on the solution) applied to an empirical RMDP estimated using the generative model. In the general case, we prove a sample complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{H^4 | S || A |}{\epsilon^2})$ for both the $sa$- and $s$-rectangular cases (improvements of $| S |$ and $| S || A |$ respectively). When the size of the uncertainty is small enough, we improve the sample complexity to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{H^3 | S || A | }{\epsilon^2})$, recovering the lower-bound for the non-robust case for the first time and a robust lower-bound. Finally, we also introduce simple and efficient algorithms for solving the studied $L_p$ robust MDPs.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

VITS: Variational Inference Thompson Sampling for contextual bandits

  • Pierre Clavier
  • Tom Huix
  • Alain Durmus

In this paper, we introduce and analyze a variant of the Thompson sampling (TS) algorithm for contextual bandits. At each round, traditional TS requires samples from the current posterior distribution, which is usually intractable. To circumvent this issue, approximate inference techniques can be used and provide samples with distribution close to the posteriors. However, current approximate techniques yield to either poor estimation (Laplace approximation) or can be computationally expensive (MCMC methods, Ensemble sampling. ..). In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, Varational Inference TS $\mathtt{VITS}$, based on Gaussian Variational Inference. This scheme provides powerful posterior approximations which are easy to sample from, and is computationally efficient, making it an ideal choice for TS. In addition, we show that $\mathtt{VITS}$ achieves a sub-linear regret bound of the same order in the dimension and number of round as traditional TS for linear contextual bandit. Finally, we demonstrate experimentally the effectiveness of $\mathtt{VITS}$ on both synthetic and real world datasets

v2026.09.13