Author name cluster

Peter West

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers

2 author rows

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Absence Bench: Language Models Can’t See What’s Missing

Harvey Yiyun Fu
Aryan Shrivastava
Jared Moore
Peter West
Chenhao Tan
Ari Holtzman

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of processing long inputs and locating specific information within them, as evidenced by their performance on the Needle in a Haystack (NIAH) test. However, while models excel at recalling surprising information, they still struggle to identify clearly omitted information. We introduce AbsenceBench to assesses LLMs' capacity to detect missing information across three domains: numerical sequences, poetry, and GitHub pull requests. AbsenceBench asks models to identify which pieces of a document were deliberately removed, given access to both the original and edited contexts. Despite the apparent straightforwardness of these tasks, our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art models like Claude-3. 7-Sonnet achieve only 69. 6% F1-score with a modest average context length of 5K tokens. Our analysis suggests this poor performance stems from a fundamental limitation: Transformer attention mechanisms cannot easily attend to "gaps" in documents since these absences don't correspond to any specific keys that can be attended to. Overall, our results and analysis provide a case study of the close proximity of tasks where models are already superhuman (NIAH) and tasks where models breakdown unexpectedly (AbsenceBench).

PDF Details

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"

Peter West
Ximing Lu
Nouha Dziri
Faeze Brahman
Linjie Li
Jena D. Hwang
Liwei Jiang
Jillian Fisher

The recent wave of generative AI has sparked unprecedented global attention, with both excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence: models now take only seconds to produce outputs that would challenge or exceed the capabilities even of expert humans. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make? In this work, we posit that this tension reflects a divergence in the configuration of intelligence in today's generative models relative to intelligence in humans. Specifically, we propose and test the **Generative AI Paradox** hypothesis: generative models, having been trained directly to reproduce expert-like outputs, acquire generative capabilities that are not contingent upon---and can therefore exceed---their ability to understand those same types of outputs. This contrasts with humans, for whom basic understanding almost always precedes the ability to generate expert-level outputs. We test this hypothesis through controlled experiments analyzing generation vs.~understanding in generative models, across both language and image modalities. Our results show that although models can outperform humans in generation, they consistently fall short of human capabilities in measures of understanding, as well as weaker correlation between generation and understanding performance, and more brittleness to adversarial inputs. Our findings support the hypothesis that models' generative capability may not be contingent upon understanding capability, and call for caution in interpreting artificial intelligence by analogy to human intelligence.

Details

AAAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties

Taylor Sorensen
Liwei Jiang
Jena D. Hwang
Sydney Levine
Valentina Pyatkin
Peter West
Nouha Dziri
Ximing Lu

Human values are crucial to human decision-making. Value pluralism is the view that multiple correct values may be held in tension with one another (e.g., when considering lying to a friend to protect their feelings, how does one balance honesty with friendship?). As statistical learners, AI systems fit to averages by default, washing out these potentially irreducible value conflicts. To improve AI systems to better reflect value pluralism, the first-order challenge is to explore the extent to which AI systems can model pluralistic human values, rights, and duties as well as their interaction. We introduce ValuePrism, a large-scale dataset of 218k values, rights, and duties connected to 31k human-written situations. ValuePrism’s contextualized values are generated by GPT-4 and deemed high-quality by human annotators 91% of the time. We conduct a large-scale study with annotators across diverse social and demographic backgrounds to try to understand whose values are represented. With ValuePrism, we build Value Kaleidoscope (or Kaleido), an open, light-weight, and structured language-based multi-task model that generates, explains, and assesses the relevance and valence (i.e., support or oppose) of human values, rights, and duties within a specific context. Humans prefer the sets of values output by our system over the teacher GPT- 4, finding them more accurate and with broader coverage. In addition, we demonstrate that Kaleido can help explain variability in human decision-making by outputting contrasting values. Finally, we show that Kaleido’s representations transfer to other philosophical frameworks and datasets, confirming the benefit of an explicit, modular, and interpretable approach to value pluralism. We hope that our work will serve as a step to making more explicit the implicit values behind human decision-making and to steering AI systems to make decisions that are more in accordance with them.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

Nouha Dziri
Ximing Lu
Melanie Sclar
Xiang (Lorraine) Li
Liwei Jiang
Bill Yuchen Lin
Sean Welleck
Peter West

Transformer large language models (LLMs) have sparked admiration for their exceptional performance on tasks that demand intricate multi-step reasoning. Yet, these models simultaneously show failures on surprisingly trivial problems. This begs the question: Are these errors incidental, or do they signal more substantial limitations? In an attempt to demystify transformer LLMs, we investigate the limits of these models across three representative compositional tasks---multi-digit multiplication, logic grid puzzles, and a classic dynamic programming problem. These tasks require breaking problems down into sub-steps and synthesizing these steps into a precise answer. We formulate compositional tasks as computation graphs to systematically quantify the level of complexity, and break down reasoning steps into intermediate sub-procedures. Our empirical findings suggest that transformer LLMs solve compositional tasks by reducing multi-step compositional reasoning into linearized subgraph matching, without necessarily developing systematic problem-solving skills. To round off our empirical study, we provide theoretical arguments on abstract multi-step reasoning problems that highlight how autoregressive generations' performance can rapidly decay with increased task complexity.

PDF Details

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correct

Sean Welleck
Ximing Lu
Peter West
Faeze Brahman
Tianxiao Shen
Daniel Khashabi
Yejin Choi 0001

Sequence generation applications require satisfying semantic constraints, such as ensuring that programs are correct, using certain keywords, or avoiding undesirable content. Language models, whether fine-tuned or prompted with few-shot demonstrations, frequently violate these constraints, and lack a mechanism to iteratively revise their outputs. Moreover, some powerful language models are of extreme scale or inaccessible, making it inefficient, if not infeasible, to update their parameters for task-specific adaptation. We present Self-Correction, an approach that decouples an imperfect base generator (an off-the-shelf language model or supervised sequence-to-sequence model) from a separate corrector that learns to iteratively correct imperfect generations. To train the corrector, we propose an online training procedure that can use either scalar or natural language feedback on intermediate imperfect generations. We show that Self-Correction improves upon the base generator in three diverse generation tasks - mathematical program synthesis, lexically-constrained generation, and toxicity control - even when the corrector is much smaller than the base generator.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Localized Symbolic Knowledge Distillation for Visual Commonsense Models

Jae Sung Park
Jack Hessel
Khyathi Chandu
Paul Pu Liang
Ximing Lu
Peter West
Youngjae Yu
Qiuyuan Huang

Instruction following vision-language (VL) models offer a flexibleinterface that supports a broad range of multimodal tasks in a zero-shot fashion. However, interfaces that operate on full images do not directly enable the user to“point to" and access specific regions within images. This capability is importantnot only to support reference-grounded VL benchmarks, but also, for practicalapplications that require precise within-image reasoning. We build LocalizedVisual Commonsense model which allows users to specify (multiple) regions-as-input. We train our model by sampling localized commonsense knowledgefrom a large language model (LLM): specifically, we prompt a LLM to collectcommonsense knowledge given a global literal image description and a localliteral region description automatically generated by a set of VL models. Thispipeline is scalable and fully automatic, as no aligned or human-authored imageand text pairs are required. With a separately trained critic model that selectshigh quality examples, we find that training on the localized commonsense corpusexpanded solely from images can successfully distill existing VL models to supporta reference-as-input interface. Empirical results and human evaluations in zero-shotsettings demonstrate that our distillation method results in more precise VL modelsof reasoning compared to a baseline of passing a generated referring expression.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

QUARK: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning

Ximing Lu
Sean Welleck
Jack Hessel
Liwei Jiang
Lianhui Qin
Peter West
Prithviraj Ammanabrolu
Yejin Choi

Large-scale language models often learn behaviors that are misaligned with user expectations. Generated text may contain offensive or toxic language, contain significant repetition, or be of a different sentiment than desired by the user. We consider the task of unlearning these misalignments by fine-tuning the language model on signals of what not to do. We introduce Quantized Reward Konditioning (Quark), an algorithm for optimizing a reward function that quantifies an (un)wanted property, while not straying too far from the original model. Quark alternates between (i) collecting samples with the current language model, (ii) sorting them into quantiles based on reward, with each quantile identified by a reward token prepended to the language model’s input, and (iii) using a standard language modeling loss on samples from each quantile conditioned on its reward token, while remaining nearby the original language model via a KL-divergence penalty. By conditioning on a high-reward token at generation time, the model generates text that exhibits less of the unwanted property. For unlearning toxicity, negative sentiment, and repetition, our experiments show that Quark outperforms both strong baselines and state-of-the-art reinforcement learning methods like PPO, while relying only on standard language modeling primitives.

PDF Details

AAAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Symbolic Brittleness in Sequence Models: On Systematic Generalization in Symbolic Mathematics

Sean Welleck
Peter West
Jize Cao
Yejin Choi

Neural sequence models trained with maximum likelihood estimation have led to breakthroughs in many tasks, where success is defined by the gap between training and test performance. However, their ability to achieve stronger forms of generalization remains unclear. We consider the problem of symbolic mathematical integration, as it requires generalizing systematically beyond the test set. We develop a methodology for evaluating generalization that takes advantage of the problem domain’s structure and access to a verifier. Despite promising in-distribution performance of sequenceto-sequence models in this domain, we demonstrate challenges in achieving robustness, compositionality, and outof-distribution generalization, through both carefully constructed manual test suites and a genetic algorithm that automatically finds large collections of failures in a controllable manner. Our investigation highlights the difficulty of generalizing well with the predominant modeling and learning approach, and the importance of evaluating beyond the test set, across different aspects of generalization.

PDF Details