Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Peter Stuckey

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

7

AAAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Explaining Propagators for String Edit Distance Constraints

  • Felix Winter
  • Nysret Musliu
  • Peter Stuckey

The computation of string similarity measures has been thoroughly studied in the scientific literature and has applications in a wide variety of different areas. One of the most widely used measures is the so called string edit distance which captures the number of required edit operations to transform a string into another given string. Although polynomial time algorithms are known for calculating the edit distance between two strings, there also exist NP-hard problems from practical applications like scheduling or computational biology that constrain the minimum edit distance between arrays of decision variables. In this work, we propose a novel global constraint to formulate restrictions on the minimum edit distance for such problems. Furthermore, we describe a propagation algorithm and investigate an explanation strategy for an edit distance constraint propagator that can be incorporated into state of the art lazy clause generation solvers. Experimental results show that the proposed propagator is able to significantly improve the performance of existing exact methods regarding solution quality and computation speed for benchmark problems from the literature.

AAAI Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Lagrangian Constrained Community Detection

  • Mohadeseh Ganji
  • James Bailey
  • Peter Stuckey

Semi-supervised or constrained community detection incorporates side information to find communities of interest in complex networks. The supervision is often represented as constraints such as known labels and pairwise constraints. Existing constrained community detection approaches often fail to fully benefit from the available side information. This results in poor performance for scenarios such as: when the constraints are required to be fully satisfied, when there is a high confidence about the correctness of the supervision information, and in situations where the side information is expensive or hard to achieve and is only available in a limited amount. In this paper, we propose a new constrained community detection algorithm based on Lagrangian multipliers to incorporate and fully satisfy the instance level supervision constraints. Our proposed algorithm can more fully utilise available side information and find better quality solutions. Our experiments on real and synthetic data sets show our proposed LagCCD algorithm outperforms existing algorithms in terms of solution quality, ability to satisfy the constraints and noise resistance.

AAAI Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Sweep-Based Propagation for String Constraint Solving

  • Roberto Amadini
  • Graeme Gange
  • Peter Stuckey

Solving constraints over strings is an emerging important field. Recently, a Constraint Programming approach based on dashed strings has been proposed to enable a compact domain representation for potentially large bounded-length string variables. In this paper, we present a more efficient algorithm for propagating equality (and related constraints) over dashed strings. We call this propagation sweep-based. Experimental evidences show that sweep-based propagation is able to significantly outperform state-of-the-art approaches for string constraint solving.

AAAI Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Automatic Logic-Based Benders Decomposition with MiniZinc

  • Toby Davies
  • Graeme Gange
  • Peter Stuckey

Logic-based Benders decomposition (LBBD) is a powerful hybrid optimisation technique that can combine the strong dual bounds of mixed integer programming (MIP) with the combinatorial search strengths of constraint programming (CP). A major drawback of LBBD is that it is a far more involved process to implement an LBBD solution to a problem than the ”model-and-run” approach provided by both CP and MIP. We propose an automated approach that accepts an arbitrary MiniZinc model and solves it using LBBD with no additional intervention on the part of the modeller. The design of this approach also reveals an interesting duality between LBBD and large neighborhood search (LNS). We compare our implementation of this approach to CP and MIP solvers on 4 different problem classes where LBBD has been applied before.

AAAI Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Steiner Tree Problems with Side Constraints Using Constraint Programming

  • Diego de Uña
  • Graeme Gange
  • Peter Schachte
  • Peter Stuckey

The Steiner Tree Problem is a well know NP-complete problem that is well studied and for which fast algorithms are already available. Nonetheless, in the real world the Steiner Tree Problem is almost always accompanied by side constraints which means these approaches cannot be applied. For many problems with side constraints, only approximation algorithms are known. We introduce here a propagator for the tree constraint with explanations, as well as lower bounding techniques and a novel constraint programming approach for the Steiner Tree Problem and two of its variants. We find our propagators with explanations are highly advantageous when it comes to solving variants of this problem.

JAIR Journal 2015 Journal Article

Lazy Model Expansion: Interleaving Grounding with Search

  • Broes De Cat
  • Marc Denecker
  • Maurice Bruynooghe
  • Peter Stuckey

Finding satisfying assignments for the variables involved in a set of constraints can be cast as a (bounded) model generation problem: search for (bounded) models of a theory in some logic. The state-of-the-art approach for bounded model generation for rich knowledge representation languages like ASP and FO(.) and a CSP modeling language such as Zinc, is ground-and-solve: reduce the theory to a ground or propositional one and apply a search algorithm to the resulting theory. An important bottleneck is the blow-up of the size of the theory caused by the grounding phase. Lazily grounding the theory during search is a way to overcome this bottleneck. We present a theoretical framework and an implementation in the context of the FO(.) knowledge representation language. Instead of grounding all parts of a theory, justifications are derived for some parts of it. Given a partial assignment for the grounded part of the theory and valid justifications for the formulas of the non-grounded part, the justifications provide a recipe to construct a complete assignment that satisfies the non-grounded part. When a justification for a particular formula becomes invalid during search, a new one is derived; if that fails, the formula is split in a part to be grounded and a part that can be justified. Experimental results illustrate the power and generality of this approach.

AAAI Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Stable Model Counting and Its Application in Probabilistic Logic Programming

  • Rehan Aziz
  • Geoffrey Chu
  • Christian Muise
  • Peter Stuckey

Model counting is the problem of computing the number of models that satisfy a given propositional theory. It has recently been applied to solving inference tasks in probabilistic logic programming, where the goal is to compute the probability of given queries being true provided a set of mutually independent random variables, a model (a logic program) and some evidence. The core of solving this inference task involves translating the logic program to a propositional theory and using a model counter. In this paper, we show that for some problems that involve inductive definitions like reachability in a graph, the translation of logic programs to SAT can be expensive for the purpose of solving inference tasks. For such problems, direct implementation of stable model semantics allows for more efficient solving. We present two implementation techniques, based on unfounded set detection, that extend a propositional model counter to a stable model counter. Our experiments show that for particular problems, our approach can outperform a state-of-the-art probabilistic logic programming solver by several orders of magnitude in terms of running time and space requirements, and can solve instances of significantly larger sizes on which the current solver runs out of time or memory.

v2026.09.13