Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Patrik Reizinger

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

7

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process

  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Alice Bizeul
  • Attila Juhos
  • Julia E. Vogt
  • Randall Balestriero
  • Wieland Brendel
  • David A. Klindt

Supervised learning has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning, yet a comprehensive theory explaining its effectiveness remains elusive. Empirical phenomena, such as neural analogy-making and the linear representation hypothesis, suggest that supervised models can learn interpretable factors of variation in a linear fashion. Recent advances in self-supervised learning, particularly nonlinear Independent Component Analysis, have shown that these methods can recover latent structures by inverting the data generating process. We extend these identifiability results to parametric instance discrimination, then show how insights transfer to the ubiquitous setting of supervised learning with cross-entropy minimization. We prove that even in standard classification tasks, models learn representations of ground-truth factors of variation up to a linear transformation under a certain DGP. We corroborate our theoretical contribution with a series of empirical studies. First, using simulated data matching our theoretical assumptions, we demonstrate successful disentanglement of latent factors. Second, we show that on DisLib, a widely-used disentanglement benchmark, simple classification tasks recover latent structures up to linear transformations. Finally, we reveal that models trained on ImageNet encode representations that permit linear decoding of proxy factors of variation. Together, our theoretical findings and experiments offer a compelling explanation for recent observations of linear representations, such as superposition in neural networks. This work takes a significant step toward a cohesive theory that accounts for the unreasonable effectiveness of supervised learning.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms for Causal Structure and Representation Learning

  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Siyuan Guo 0003
  • Ferenc Huszar
  • Bernhard Schölkopf
  • Wieland Brendel

Identifying latent representations or causal structures is important for good generalization and downstream task performance. However, both fields developed rather independently. We observe that several structure and representation identifiability methods, particularly those that require multiple environments, rely on exchangeable non--i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) data. To formalize this connection, we propose the Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms (IEM) framework to unify key representation and causal structure learning methods. IEM provides a unified probabilistic graphical model encompassing causal discovery, Independent Component Analysis, and Causal Representation Learning. With the help of the IEM model, we generalize the Causal de Finetti theorem of Guo et al., 2022 by relaxing the necessary conditions for causal structure identification in exchangeable data. We term these conditions cause and mechanism variability, and show how they imply a duality condition in identifiable representation learning, leading to new identifiability results.

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Occam’s Razor for SSL: Memory-Efficient Parametric Instance Discrimination

  • Eric Gan
  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Alice Bizeul
  • Attila Juhos
  • Mark Ibrahim
  • Randall Balestriero
  • David Klindt
  • Wieland Brendel

Self-supervised learning (SSL) is the prevalent paradigm for representation learning often relying on pairwise similarity between multiple augmented views of each example. Numerous learning methods with various complexities such as gradient stopping, negative sampling, projectors, additional regularization terms, were introduced in the past years. These methods can be effective, but they require careful hyperparameter tuning, have increased computational and memory requirements and struggle with latent dimensionality collapse. Furthermore, complexities such as gradient stopping make them hard to analyse theoretically and confound the essential components of SSL. We introduce a simple parametric instance discrimination method, called Datum IndEx as its Target (DIET). DIET has a single computational branch, without explicit negative sampling, gradient stopping or other hyperparameters. We empirically demonstrate that DIET (1) can be implemented in a memory-efficient way; (2) achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art SSL methods on small-scale datasets; and (3) is robust to hyperparameters such as batch size. We uncover tight connections to Spectral Contrastive Learning in the lazy training regime, leading to practical insights about the role of feature normalization. Compared to SimCLR or VICReg, DIET also has higher-rank embeddings on CIFAR100 and TinyImageNet, suggesting that DIET captures more latent information.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Position: Understanding LLMs Requires More Than Statistical Generalization

  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Szilvia Ujváry
  • Anna Mészáros
  • Anna Kerekes
  • Wieland Brendel
  • Ferenc Huszar

The last decade has seen blossoming research in deep learning theory attempting to answer, “Why does deep learning generalize? " A powerful shift in perspective precipitated this progress: the study of overparametrized models in the interpolation regime. In this paper, we argue that another perspective shift is due, since some of the desirable qualities of LLMs are not a consequence of good statistical generalization and require a separate theoretical explanation. Our core argument relies on the observation that AR probabilistic models are inherently non-identifiable: models zero or near-zero KL divergence apart—thus, equivalent test loss—can exhibit markedly different behaviors. We support our position with mathematical examples and empirical observations, illustrating why non-identifiability has practical relevance through three case studies: (1) the non-identifiability of zero-shot rule extrapolation; (2) the approximate non-identifiability of in-context learning; and (3) the non-identifiability of fine-tunability. We review promising research directions focusing on LLM-relevant generalization measures, transferability, and inductive biases.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Rule Extrapolation in Language Modeling: A Study of Compositional Generalization on OOD Prompts

  • Anna Mészáros
  • Szilvia Ujváry
  • Wieland Brendel
  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Ferenc Huszár

LLMs show remarkable emergent abilities, such as inferring concepts from presumably out-of-distribution prompts, known as in-context learning. Though this success is often attributed to the Transformer architecture, our systematic understanding is limited. In complex real-world data sets, even defining what is out-of-distribution is not obvious. To better understand the OOD behaviour of autoregressive LLMs, we focus on formal languages, which are defined by the intersection of rules. We define a new scenario of OOD compositional generalization, termed \textit{rule extrapolation}. Rule extrapolation describes OOD scenarios, where the prompt violates at least one rule. We evaluate rule extrapolation in formal languages with varying complexity in linear and recurrent architectures, the Transformer, and state space models to understand the architectures' influence on rule extrapolation. We also lay the first stones of a normative theory of rule extrapolation, inspired by the Solomonoff prior in algorithmic information theory.

TMLR Journal 2023 Journal Article

Jacobian-based Causal Discovery with Nonlinear ICA

  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Yash Sharma
  • Matthias Bethge
  • Bernhard Schölkopf
  • Ferenc Huszár
  • Wieland Brendel

Today's methods for uncovering causal relationships from observational data either constrain functional assignments (linearity/additive noise assumptions) or the data generating process (e.g., non-i.i.d. assumptions). Unlike previous works, which use conditional independence tests, we rely on the inference function's Jacobian to determine nonlinear cause-effect relationships. We prove that, under strong identifiability, the inference function's Jacobian captures the sparsity structure of the causal graph; thus, generalizing the classic LiNGAM method to the nonlinear case. We use nonlinear Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to infer the underlying sources from the observed variables and show how nonlinear ICA is compatible with causal discovery via non-i.i.d data. Our approach avoids the cost of exponentially many independence tests and makes our method end-to-end differentiable. We demonstrate that the proposed method can infer the causal graph on multiple synthetic data sets, and in most scenarios outperforms previous work.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis

  • Patrik Reizinger
  • Luigi Gresele
  • Jack Brady
  • Julius von Kügelgen
  • Dominik Zietlow
  • Bernhard Schölkopf
  • Georg Martius
  • Wieland Brendel

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are a popular framework for modeling complex data distributions; they can be efficiently trained via variational inference by maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO), at the expense of a gap to the exact (log-)marginal likelihood. While VAEs are commonly used for representation learning, it is unclear why ELBO maximization would yield useful representations, since unregularized maximum likelihood estimation cannot invert the data-generating process. Yet, VAEs often succeed at this task. We seek to elucidate this apparent paradox by studying nonlinear VAEs in the limit of near-deterministic decoders. We first prove that, in this regime, the optimal encoder approximately inverts the decoder---a commonly used but unproven conjecture---which we refer to as self-consistency. Leveraging self-consistency, we show that the ELBO converges to a regularized log-likelihood. This allows VAEs to perform what has recently been termed independent mechanism analysis (IMA): it adds an inductive bias towards decoders with column-orthogonal Jacobians, which helps recovering the true latent factors. The gap between ELBO and log-likelihood is therefore welcome, since it bears unanticipated benefits for nonlinear representation learning. In experiments on synthetic and image data, we show that VAEs uncover the true latent factors when the data generating process satisfies the IMA assumption.

v2026.09.13