EAAI Journal 2026 Journal Article
An interpretable civil case judgment prediction method based on logical reasoning and knowledge enhancement
- Shibo Cui
- Yu Sun
- Ning Wang
- Wenguang Yan
Civil case judgment prediction attempts to help judicial decision-making by artificial intelligence methods, and its accuracy directly affects judicial efficiency and social fairness perception. Current mainstream methods typically rely heavily on the case’s surface aspects while ignoring the underlying legal reasoning, and they are limited by the black-box model’s lack of interpretability, which is insufficient to cope with multi-class disputes and confusing cases. To address these issues, we propose an interpretable judgment prediction method that combines logical reasoning and knowledge enhancement, performing multi-task prediction in civil cases. First, a self-critique chain of thought reasoning module is created to extract the logical relationships implied by the case facts via the large language model, and discrete prompt alignment is used to improve the logical interpretability of judgment prediction. Second, the knowledge enhancement module is designed to inject external legal knowledge while adaptively filtering noise. Furthermore, a multi-task expert recommendation process is presented to pick the appropriate expert sub-model via a dynamic gating network, thereby enhancing the discrimination capability of multi-category disputes. Experiments with real datasets demonstrate that the method outperforms existing methods in terms of accuracy and interpretability. Experiments on a dataset of confusing cases demonstrate the method’s superior generalization ability in complex scenarios.