Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

M.Y. Vardi

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

2

I&C Journal 1995 Journal Article

On Monadic NP vs Monadic co-NP

  • R. Fagin
  • L.J. Stockmeyer
  • M.Y. Vardi

It is a well-known result of Fagin that the complexity class NP coincides with the class of problems expressible in existential second-order logic (Σ1 1). Monadic NP is the class of problems expressible in monadic Σ1 1, i. e. , Σ1 1 with the restriction that the second-order quantifiers range only over sets (as opposed to ranging over, say, binary relations). We prove that connectivity of finite graphs is not in monadic NP, even in the presence of arbitrary built-in relations of moderate degree (that is, degree (log n) o(1)). This extends earlier results of Fagin and de Rougemont. Our proof uses a combination of three techniques: (1) an old technique of Hanf for showing that two (infinite) structures agree on all first-order sentences, under certain conditions, (2) a recent new approach to second-order Ehrenfeucht-Fraı̈ssé games by Ajtai and Fagin, and (3) playing Ehrenfeucht-Fraı̈ssé games over random structures (this was also used by Ajtai and Fagin). Regarding (1), we give a version of Hanf′s result that is better suited for use as a tool in inexpressibility proofs for classes of finite structures. The power of these techniques is further demonstrated by using them (actually, using just the first two techniques) to give a very simple proof of the separation of monadic NP from monadic co-NP without the presence of built-in relations.

I&C Journal 1994 Journal Article

Reasoning about Infinite Computations

  • M.Y. Vardi
  • P. Wolper

We investigate extensions of temporal logic by connectives defined by finite automata on infinite words. We consider three different logics, corresponding to three different types of acceptance conditions (finite, looping, and repeating) for the automata. It turns out, however that these logics all have the same expressive power and that their decision problems are all PSPACE-complete. We also investigate connectives defined by alternating automata and show that they do not increase the expressive power of the logic or the complexity of the decision problem.

v2026.09.13