Author name cluster

Mitchell Ostrow

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers

1 author row

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Characterizing control between interacting subsystems with deep Jacobian estimation

Adam J. Eisen
Mitchell Ostrow
Sarthak Chandra
Leo Kozachkov
Earl Miller
Ila Fiete

Biological function arises through the dynamical interactions of multiple subsystems, including those between brain areas, within gene regulatory networks, and more. A common approach to understanding these systems is to model the dynamics of each subsystem and characterize communication between them. An alternative approach is through the lens of control theory: how the subsystems control one another. This approach involves inferring the directionality, strength, and contextual modulation of control between subsystems. However, methods for understanding subsystem control are typically linear and cannot adequately describe the rich contextual effects enabled by nonlinear complex systems. To bridge this gap, we devise a data-driven nonlinear control-theoretic framework to characterize subsystem interactions via the Jacobian of the dynamics. We address the challenge of learning Jacobians from time-series data by proposing the JacobianODE, a deep learning method that leverages properties of the Jacobian to directly estimate it for arbitrary dynamical systems from data alone. We show that JacobianODE models outperform existing Jacobian estimation methods on challenging systems, including high-dimensional chaos. Applying our approach to a multi-area recurrent neural network (RNN) trained on a working memory selection task, we show that the “sensory” area gains greater control over the “cognitive” area over learning. Furthermore, we leverage the JacobianODE to directly control the trained RNN, enabling precise manipulation of its behavior. Our work lays the foundation for a theoretically grounded and data-driven understanding of interactions among biological subsystems.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

How Diffusion Models Learn to Factorize and Compose

Qiyao Liang
Ziming Liu
Mitchell Ostrow
Ila Fiete

Diffusion models are capable of generating photo-realistic images that combine elements which do not appear together in natural images, demonstrating their ability to compositionally generalize. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism of compositionality and how it is acquired through training remains elusive. Here, we consider a highly reduced setting to examine whether diffusion models learn semantically meaningful and fully factorized representations of composable features. We performed extensive controlled experiments on conditional DDPMs trained to generate various forms of 2D Gaussian data. We demonstrate that the models learn factorized, semi-continuous manifold representations that are orthogonal in underlying continuous latent features of independent variations but are not aligned for different values of the same feature. With such representations, models demonstrate superior compositionality but have limited ability to interpolate over unseen values of a given feature. Our experimental results further demonstrate that diffusion models can attain compositionality with a small amount of compositional examples, suggesting a novel way to train DDPMs. Finally, we connect manifold formation in diffusion models to percolation theory in physics, thereby offering insights into the sudden onset of factorized representation learning. Our thorough toy experiments thus contribute a deeper understanding of how diffusion models capture compositional structure in data, paving the way for future research aimed at enhancing factorization and compositional generalization in generative models for real-world applications.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Beyond Geometry: Comparing the Temporal Structure of Computation in Neural Circuits with Dynamical Similarity Analysis

Mitchell Ostrow
Adam Eisen
Leo Kozachkov
Ila Fiete

How can we tell whether two neural networks utilize the same internal processes for a particular computation? This question is pertinent for multiple subfields of neuroscience and machine learning, including neuroAI, mechanistic interpretability, and brain-machine interfaces. Standard approaches for comparing neural networks focus on the spatial geometry of latent states. Yet in recurrent networks, computations are implemented at the level of dynamics, and two networks performing the same computation with equivalent dynamics need not exhibit the same geometry. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel similarity metric that compares two systems at the level of their dynamics, called Dynamical Similarity Analysis (DSA). Our method incorporates two components: Using recent advances in data-driven dynamical systems theory, we learn a high-dimensional linear system that accurately captures core features of the original nonlinear dynamics. Next, we compare different systems passed through this embedding using a novel extension of Procrustes Analysis that accounts for how vector fields change under orthogonal transformation. In four case studies, we demonstrate that our method disentangles conjugate and non-conjugate recurrent neural networks (RNNs), while geometric methods fall short. We additionally show that our method can distinguish learning rules in an unsupervised manner. Our method opens the door to comparative analyses of the essential temporal structure of computation in neural circuits.

PDF Details