Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Miqing Li

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

12 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

12

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Not Just for Archiving: Provable Benefits of Reusing the Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization

  • Shengjie Ren
  • Zimin Liang
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have become the most popular tool for solving widely-existed multi-objective optimization problems. In Multi-Objective EAs (MOEAs), there is increasing interest in using an archive to store non-dominated solutions generated during the search. This approach can 1) mitigate the effects of population oscillation, a common issue in many MOEAs, and 2) allow for the use of smaller, more practical population sizes. In this paper, we analytically show that the archive can even further help MOEAs through reusing its solutions during the process of new solution generation. We first prove that using a small population size alongside an archive (without incorporating archived solutions in the generation process) may fail on certain problems, as the population may remove previously discovered but promising solutions. We then prove that reusing archive solutions can overcome this limitation, resulting in at least a polynomial speedup on the expected running time. Our analysis focuses on the well-established SMS-EMOA algorithm applied to the commonly studied OneJumpZeroJump problem as well as one of its variants. We also show that reusing archive solutions can be better than using a large population size directly. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings through experiments on well-known practical optimization problems.

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Random is Faster than Systematic in Multi-Objective Local Search

  • Zimin Liang
  • Miqing Li

Local search is a fundamental method in operations research and combinatorial optimisation. It has been widely applied to a variety of challenging problems, including multi-objective optimisation where multiple, often conflicting, objectives need to be simultaneously considered. In multi-objective local search algorithms, a common practice is to maintain an archive of all non-dominated solutions found so far, from which the algorithm iteratively samples a solution to explore its neighbourhood. A central issue in this process is how to explore the neighbourhood of a selected solution. In general, there are two main approaches: 1) systematic exploration and 2) random sampling. The former systematically explores the solution's neighbours until a stopping condition is met -- for example, when the neighbourhood is exhausted (i.e., the best improvement strategy) or once a better solution is found (i.e., first improvement). In contrast, the latter randomly selects and evaluates only one neighbour of the solution. One may think systematic exploration may be more efficient, as it prevents from revisiting the same neighbours multiple times. In this paper, however, we show that this may not be the case. We first empirically demonstrate that the random sampling method is consistently faster than the systematic exploration method across a range of multi-objective problems. We then give an intuitive explanation for this phenomenon using toy examples, showing that the superior performance of the random sampling method relies on the distribution of ``good neighbours''. Next, we show that the number of such neighbours follows a certain probability distribution during the search. Lastly, building on this distribution, we provide a theoretical insight for why random sampling is more efficient than systematic exploration, regardless of whether the best improvement or first improvement strategy is used.

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

A Theoretical Perspective on Why Stochastic Population Update Needs an Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization

  • Shengjie Ren
  • Zimin Liang
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been widely applied to multi-objective optimization due to their population-based nature. Population update, a key component in multi-objective EAs (MOEAs), is usually performed in a greedy, deterministic manner. However, recent studies have questioned this practice and shown that stochastic population update (SPU), which allows inferior solutions have a chance to be preserved, can help MOEAs jump out of local optima more easily. Nevertheless, SPU risks losing high-quality solutions, potentially requiring a large population. Intuitively, a possible solution to this issue is to introduce an archive that stores the best solutions ever found. In this paper, we theoretically show that using an archive allows a small population and may enhance the search performance of SPU-based MOEAs. We examine two classic algorithms, SMS-EMOA and NSGA-II, on the bi-objective problem OneJumpZeroJump, and prove that using an archive can reduce the expected running time upper bound (even exponentially). The comparison between SMS-EMOA and NSGA-II also suggests that the (μ+μ) update mode may be more suitable for SPU than the (μ+1) update mode. We also validate our findings empirically. We hope this work may provide theoretical support to explore different ideas of designing algorithms in evolutionary multi-objective optimization.

JAIR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Solving Overlapping Coalition Structure Generation in Task-Based Settings

  • Guofu Zhang
  • Zhaopin Su
  • Xiaoxiao Song
  • Zixuan Gao
  • Miqing Li
  • Xin Yao

The overlapping coalition structure generation problem (OCSGP) is a challenging computational problem in multi-agent systems. It focuses on selecting possibly overlapping coalitions from a set of agents to maximize the social welfare of all coalitions while containing all agents. However, in practical applications, coalitions may be formed to selectively respond to tasks from a pool of potential tasks assigned to agents. Consequently, this study considers OCSGP in a task-based setting, where each agent has finite resources and can only respond to tasks of interest, and each coalition can only take on mutually disjoint subsets of tasks. Specifically, we first present a model of the task-based OCSGP and investigate its computational complexity. Our theoretical results demonstrate that this specific OCSGP remains intractable even under restrictive assumptions. Subsequently, we develop a generic evolutionary algorithm framework (EAF) to find an approximately optimal overlapping coalition structure (OCS) in time quartic polynomial in the size of the instance. Particularly, we devise a specific solution-repair based heuristic of cubic time complexity to generate a feasible OCS. Finally, we compare the proposed EAF with a task-oriented heuristic and a hybrid algorithm for OCSGP, and examine its applicability in the pursuit-evasion problem. The experimental results reveal that the proposed EAF exhibits superior performance in finding feasible OCSs and demonstrates flexible adaptability to problem size and resource status.

AIJ Journal 2025 Journal Article

Stochastic population update can provably be helpful in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms

  • Chao Bian
  • Yawen Zhou
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been widely and successfully applied to solve multi-objective optimization problems, due to their nature of population-based search. Population update, a key component in multi-objective EAs (MOEAs), is usually performed in a greedy, deterministic manner. That is, the next-generation population is formed by selecting the best solutions from the current population and newly-generated solutions (irrespective of the selection criteria used such as Pareto dominance, crowdedness and indicators). In this paper, we analytically present that stochastic population update can be beneficial for the search of MOEAs. Specifically, we prove that the expected running time of two well-established MOEAs, SMS-EMOA and NSGA-II, for solving two bi-objective problems, OneJumpZeroJump and bi-objective RealRoyalRoad, can be exponentially decreased if replacing its deterministic population update mechanism by a stochastic one. Empirical studies also verify the effectiveness of the proposed population update method. This work is an attempt to show the benefit of introducing randomness into the population update of MOEAs. Its positive results, which might hold more generally, should encourage the exploration of developing new MOEAs in the area.

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Trading Off Quality and Uncertainty Through Multi-Objective Optimisation in Batch Bayesian Optimisation

  • Chao Jiang
  • Miqing Li

Batch Bayesian Optimisation (BBO) has emerged as a potent approach for optimising expensive black-box functions. Central to BBO is the issue of selecting a number of solutions at the same time through a batch method, in the hope for them to represent good, yet different, trade-offs between exploitation and exploration. To address this issue, one of the recent advancements has leveraged multi-objective optimisation to simultaneously consider several acquisition functions (e.g., PI, EI, and LCB), allowing them to complement each other. However, acquisition functions may behave similarly (since they all aim for a good balance between exploitation and exploration), restricting the search on different promising areas. In this paper, we attempt to address the above issue. We directly treat exploitation (reflected by quality, i.e., the posterior mean) and exploration (reflected by uncertainty) as two objectives. When selecting trade-off solutions between the two objectives, we consider a dynamically updated Pareto front where the uncertainty changes once a solution is selected, thereby allowing exploration on different promising areas. Through an extensive experiment study, we show the effectiveness of the proposed method in comparison with state-of-the-arts in the area.

IJCAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

An Archive Can Bring Provable Speed-ups in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Chao Bian
  • Shengjie Ren
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

In the area of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), there is a trend of using an archive to store non-dominated solutions generated during the search. This is because 1) MOEAs may easily end up with the final population containing inferior solutions that are dominated by other solutions discarded during the search process and 2) the population that has a commensurable size of the problem's Pareto front is often not practical. In this paper, we theoretically show, for the first time, that using an archive can guarantee speed-ups for MOEAs. Specifically, we prove that for two well-established MOEAs (NSGA-II and SMS-EMOA) on two commonly studied problems (OneMinMax and LeadingOnesTrailingZeroes), using an archive brings a polynomial acceleration on the expected running time. The reason is that with an archive, the size of the population can reduce to a small constant; there is no need for the population to keep all the Pareto optimal solutions found. This contrasts existing theoretical studies for MOEAs where a population with a commensurable size of the problem's Pareto front is needed. The findings in this paper not only provide a theoretical confirmation for an increasingly popular practice in the design of MOEAs, but can also be beneficial to the theory community towards studying more practical MOEAs.

IJCAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Maintaining Diversity Provably Helps in Evolutionary Multimodal Optimization

  • Shengjie Ren
  • Zhijia Qiu
  • Chao Bian
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

In the real world, there exist a class of optimization problems that multiple (local) optimal solutions in the solution space correspond to a single point in the objective space. In this paper, we theoretically show that for such multimodal problems, a simple method that considers the diversity of solutions in the solution space can benefit the search in evolutionary algorithms (EAs). Specifically, we prove that the proposed method, working with crossover, can help enhance the exploration, leading to polynomial or even exponential acceleration on the expected running time. This result is derived by rigorous running time analysis in both single-objective and multi-objective scenarios, including (mu+1)-GA solving the widely studied single-objective problem, Jump, and NSGA-II and SMS-EMOA (two well-established multi-objective EAs) solving the widely studied bi-objective problem, OneJumpZeroJump. Experiments are also conducted to validate the theoretical results. We hope that our results may encourage the exploration of diversity maintenance in the solution space for multi-objective optimization, where existing EAs usually only consider the diversity in the objective space and can easily be trapped in local optima.

IJCAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Stochastic Population Update Can Provably Be Helpful in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Chao Bian
  • Yawen Zhou
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been widely and successfully applied to solve multi-objective optimization problems, due to their nature of population-based search. Population update is a key component in multi-objective EAs (MOEAs), and it is performed in a greedy, deterministic manner. That is, the next-generation population is formed by selecting the first population-size ranked solutions (based on some selection criteria, e. g. , non-dominated sorting, crowdedness and indicators) from the collections of the current population and newly-generated solutions. In this paper, we question this practice. We analytically present that introducing randomness into the population update procedure in MOEAs can be beneficial for the search. More specifically, we prove that the expected running time of a well-established MOEA (SMS-EMOA) for solving a commonly studied bi-objective problem, OneJumpZeroJump, can be exponentially decreased if replacing its deterministic population update mechanism by a stochastic one. Empirical studies also verify the effectiveness of the proposed stochastic population update method. This work is an attempt to challenge a common practice for the population update in MOEAs. Its positive results, which might hold more generally, should encourage the exploration of developing new MOEAs in the area.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration

  • Ke Xue
  • Jiacheng Xu
  • Lei Yuan
  • Miqing Li
  • Chao Qian
  • Zongzhang Zhang
  • Yang Yu

Automated algorithm configuration relieves users from tedious, trial-and-error tuning tasks. A popular algorithm configuration tuning paradigm is dynamic algorithm configuration (DAC), in which an agent learns dynamic configuration policies across instances by reinforcement learning (RL). However, in many complex algorithms, there may exist different types of configuration hyperparameters, and such heterogeneity may bring difficulties for classic DAC which uses a single-agent RL policy. In this paper, we aim to address this issue and propose multi-agent DAC (MA-DAC), with one agent working for one type of configuration hyperparameter. MA-DAC formulates the dynamic configuration of a complex algorithm with multiple types of hyperparameters as a contextual multi-agent Markov decision process and solves it by a cooperative multi-agent RL (MARL) algorithm. To instantiate, we apply MA-DAC to a well-known optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Experimental results show the effectiveness of MA-DAC in not only achieving superior performance compared with other configuration tuning approaches based on heuristic rules, multi-armed bandits, and single-agent RL, but also being capable of generalizing to different problem classes. Furthermore, we release the environments in this paper as a benchmark for testing MARL algorithms, with the hope of facilitating the application of MARL.

TAAS Journal 2019 Journal Article

Finding the Largest Successful Coalition under the Strict Goal Preferences of Agents

  • Zhaopin Su
  • Guofu Zhang
  • Feng Yue
  • Jindong He
  • Miqing Li
  • Bin Li
  • Xin Yao

Coalition formation has been a fundamental form of resource cooperation for achieving joint goals in multiagent systems. Most existing studies still focus on the traditional assumption that an agent has to contribute its resources to all the goals, even if the agent is not interested in the goal at all. In this article, a natural extension of the traditional coalitional resource games (CRGs) is studied from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, in which each agent has uncompromising, personalized preferences over goals. Specifically, a new CRGs model with agents’ strict preferences for goals is presented, in which an agent is willing to contribute its resources only to the goals that are in its own interest set. The computational complexity of the basic decision problems surrounding the successful coalition is reinvestigated. The results suggest that these problems in such a strict preference way are complex and intractable. To find the largest successful coalition for possible computation reduction or potential parallel processing, a flow-network–based exhaust algorithm, called FNetEA, is proposed to achieve the optimal solution. Then, to solve the problem more efficiently, a hybrid algorithm, named 2D-HA, is developed to find the approximately optimal solution on the basis of genetic algorithm, two-dimensional (2D) solution representation, and a heuristic for solution repairs. Through extensive experiments, the 2D-HA algorithm exhibits the prominent ability to provide reassurances that the optimal solution could be found within a reasonable period of time, even in a super-large-scale space.

AIJ Journal 2015 Journal Article

Bi-goal evolution for many-objective optimization problems

  • Miqing Li
  • Shengxiang Yang
  • Xiaohui Liu

This paper presents a meta-objective optimization approach, called Bi-Goal Evolution (BiGE), to deal with multi-objective optimization problems with many objectives. In multi-objective optimization, it is generally observed that 1) the conflict between the proximity and diversity requirements is aggravated with the increase of the number of objectives and 2) the Pareto dominance loses its effectiveness for a high-dimensional space but works well on a low-dimensional space. Inspired by these two observations, BiGE converts a given multi-objective optimization problem into a bi-goal (objective) optimization problem regarding proximity and diversity, and then handles it using the Pareto dominance relation in this bi-goal domain. Implemented with estimation methods of individuals' performance and the classic Pareto nondominated sorting procedure, BiGE divides individuals into different nondominated layers and attempts to put well-converged and well-distributed individuals into the first few layers. From a series of extensive experiments on four groups of well-defined continuous and combinatorial optimization problems with 5, 10 and 15 objectives, BiGE has been found to be very competitive against five state-of-the-art algorithms in balancing proximity and diversity. The proposed approach is the first step towards a new way of addressing many-objective problems as well as indicating several important issues for future development of this type of algorithms.