Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Michael Schüpbach

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

2

YNICL Journal 2020 Journal Article

Structure-function relationship of the posterior subthalamic area with directional deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

  • Jean-Philippe Lévy
  • T.A. Khoa Nguyen
  • Lenard Lachenmayer
  • Ines Debove
  • Gerd Tinkhauser
  • Katrin Petermann
  • Alba Segura Amil
  • Joan Michelis

Deep Brain Stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area is an emergent target for the treatment of Essential Tremor. Due to the heterogeneous and complex anatomy of the posterior subthalamic area, it remains unclear which specific structures mediate tremor suppression and different side effects. The objective of the current work was to yield a better understanding of what anatomical structures mediate the different clinical effects observed during directional deep brain stimulation of that area. We analysed a consecutive series of 12 essential tremor patients. Imaging analysis and systematic clinical testing performed 4-6 months postoperatively yielded location, clinical efficacy and corresponding therapeutic windows for 160 directional contacts. Overlap ratios between individual activation volumes and neighbouring thalamic and subthalamic nuclei as well as individual fiber tracts were calculated. Further, we generated stimulation heatmaps to assess the area of activity and structures stimulated during tremor suppression and occurrence of side effects. Stimulation of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the zona incerta was most consistently correlated with tremor suppression. Both individual and group analysis demonstrated a similar pattern of activation for tremor suppression and different sorts of side-effects. Unlike current clinical concepts, induction of spasms and paresthesia were not correlated with stimulation of the corticospinal tract and the medial lemniscus. Furthermore, we noticed a significant difference in the therapeutic window between the best and worst directional contacts. The best directional contacts did not provide significantly larger therapeutic windows than omnidirectional stimulation at the same level. Deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area effectively suppresses all aspects of ET but can be associated with concomitant side effects limiting the therapeutic window. Activation patterns for tremor suppression and side effects were similar and predominantly involved the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the zona incerta. We found no different activation patterns between different types of side effects and no clear correlation between structure and function. Future studies with use of more sophisticated modelling of activation volumes taking into account fiber heterogeneity and orientation may eventually better delineate these different clusters, which may allow for a refined targeting and programming within this area.

YNICL Journal 2016 Journal Article

T2-relaxometry predicts outcome of DBS in idiopathic Parkinson's disease

  • Tarja Lönnfors-Weitzel
  • Thilo Weitzel
  • Johannes Slotboom
  • Claus Kiefer
  • Claudio Pollo
  • Michael Schüpbach
  • Markus Oertel
  • Alain Kaelin

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) nowadays is a well-established treatment of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a common target for DBS, because motor improvements have been shown to be superior to best medical therapy, if DBS electrodes have been appropriately positioned. DBS target identification can be assisted by MRI beyond structural imaging by spatially resolved measurement of T2-relaxation times (T2r). AIM: We pose the question, whether T2r of the STN is linked to the severity of the disease and whether outcome of DBS may be correlated to an asymmetric manifestation of the disease. Further, we investigated if abnormal T2r in the STN may be predictive for outcome of DBS. METHODS: Twelve patients underwent preoperative MR imaging including a multi echo relaxometry sequence (3 Tesla, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) ahead of DBS. T2r were determined for STN, substantia nigra (SN), red nucleus (RN) and centrum semiovale (CSO). Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores were tested before and after DBS. Patients' T2r and deduced values representing left-right asymmetry of measurements were correlated with UPDRS scores and measures for outcome of DBS. Furthermore, patients' T2r were compared with T2r measurements in 12 healthy controls (HC). RESULTS: Patients' T2r for SN (mean 45.4 ms ± 4.4 ms) and STN (mean 56.4 ms ± 3.8 ms) were significantly shorter than T2r in HCs for SN (mean 60.7 ± 4.6) and STN (mean 66.1 ms ± 4.0 ms). While no mean T2r asymmetry was found in the SN, patients' mean T2r for STN showed a weakened left-right correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.19 versus 0.72 in HC) indicating asymmetric degeneration. T2r asymmetry was not linked to the more severely affected hemisphere. The respective lower T2r within the left or right target region was significantly correlated to the outcome in terms of UPDRS III improvement in "off" state (Pearson correlation 0.82 corresponding to p ≪ 0.01). Patients with T2r of STN lower than 50 ms showed no response to DBS in the UPDRS. The maximum T2r for SN correlated to the improvement between UPDRS "off" minus and "on" (Dopamine response) but failed to predict DBS outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The lower boundaries of T2r in the STN predict motor outcome in DBS. T2r asymmetry in the STN is not associated with increased clinical symptoms, but with response to therapy. Thus, patients with very low T2r may be inappropriate candidates for DBS.

v2026.09.13