Author name cluster

Melissa Hall

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers

2 author rows

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Boosting Latent Diffusion with Perceptual Objectives

Tariq Berrada
Pietro Astolfi
Melissa Hall
Marton Havasi
Yohann Benchetrit
Adriana Romero-Soriano
Karteek Alahari
Michal Drozdzal

Latent diffusion models (LDMs) power state-of-the-art high-resolution generative image models. LDMs learn the data distribution in the latent space of an autoencoder (AE) and produce images by mapping the generated latents into RGB image space using the AE decoder. While this approach allows for efficient model training and sampling, it induces a disconnect between the training of the diffusion model and the decoder, resulting in a loss of detail in the generated images. To remediate this disconnect, we propose to leverage the internal features of the decoder to define a latent perceptual loss (LPL). This loss encourages the models to create sharper and more realistic images. Our loss can be seamlessly integrated with common autoencoders used in latent diffusion models, and can be applied to different generative modeling paradigms such as DDPM with epsilon and velocity prediction, as well as flow matching. Extensive experiments with models trained on three datasets at 256 and 512 resolution show improved quantitative -- with boosts between 6% and 20% in FID -- and qualitative results when using our perceptual loss.

Details

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Improving the Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data with Deliberate Practice

Reyhane Askari Hemmat
Mohammad Pezeshki
Elvis Dohmatob
Florian Bordes
Pietro Astolfi
Melissa Hall
Jakob J. Verbeek
Michal Drozdzal

Inspired by the principle of deliberate practice in human learning, we propose Deliberate Practice for Synthetic Data Generation (DP), a novel framework that improves sample efficiency through dynamic synthetic data generation. Prior work has shown that scaling synthetic data is inherently challenging, as naively adding new data leads to diminishing returns. To address this, pruning has been identified as a key mechanism for improving scaling, enabling models to focus on the most informative synthetic samples. Rather than generating a large dataset and pruning it afterward, DP efficiently approximates the direct generation of informative samples. We theoretically show how training on challenging, informative examples improves scaling laws and empirically validate that DP achieves better scaling performance with significantly fewer training samples and iterations. On ImageNet-100, DP generates 3. 4x fewer samples and requires six times fewer iterations, while on ImageNet-1k, it generates 8x fewer samples with a 30% reduction in iterations, all while achieving superior performance compared to prior work.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Increasing the Utility of Synthetic Images through Chamfer Guidance

Nicola DallAsen
Xiaofeng Zhang
Reyhane Askari Hemmat
Melissa Hall
Jakob Verbeek
Adriana Romero-Soriano
Michal Drozdzal

Conditional image generative models hold considerable promise to produce infinite amounts of synthetic training data. Yet, recent progress in generation quality has come at the expense of generation diversity, limiting the utility of these models as a source of synthetic training data. Although guidance-based approaches have been introduced to improve the utility of generated data by focusing on quality or diversity, the (implicit or explicit) utility functions oftentimes disregard the potential distribution shift between synthetic and real data. In this work, we introduce Chamfer Guidance: a training-free guidance approach which leverages a handful of real exemplar images to characterize the quality and diversity of synthetic data. We show that by leveraging the proposed Chamfer Guidance, we can boost the diversity of the generations w. r. t. a dataset of real images while maintaining or improving the generation quality on ImageNet-1k and standard geo-diversity benchmarks. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art few-shot performance with as little as 2 exemplar real images, obtaining 96. 4% in terms of precision, and 86. 4% in terms of distributional coverage, which increase to 97. 5% and 92. 7%, respectively, when using 32 real images. We showcase the benefits of the Chamfer Guidance generation by training downstream image classifiers on synthetic data, achieving accuracy boost of up to 15% for in-distribution over the baselines, and up to 16\% in out-of-distribution. Furthermore, our approach does not require using the unconditional model, and thus obtains a 31\% reduction in FLOPs w. r. t. classifier-free-guidance-based approaches at sampling time.

PDF Details

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

DIG In: Evaluating Disparities in Image Generations with Indicators for Geographic Diversity

Melissa Hall
Candace Ross
Adina Williams
Nicolas Carion
Michal Drozdzal
Adriana Romero-Soriano

The unprecedented photorealistic results achieved by recent text-to-image generative systems and their increasing use as plug-and-play content creation solutions make it crucial to understand their potential biases. In this work, we introduce three indicators to evaluate the realism, diversity and prompt-generation consistency of text-to-image generative systems when prompted to generate objects from across the world. Our indicators complement qualitative analysis of the broader impact of such systems by enabling automatic and efficient benchmarking of geographic disparities, an important step towards building responsible visual content creation systems. We use our proposed indicators to analyze potential geographic biases in state-of-the-art visual content creation systems and find that: (1) models have less realism and diversity of generations when prompting for Africa and West Asia than Europe, (2) prompting with geographic information comes at a cost to prompt-consistency and diversity of generated images, and (3) models exhibit more region-level disparities for some objects than others. Perhaps most interestingly, our indicators suggest that progress in image generation quality has come at the cost of real-world geographic representation. Our comprehensive evaluation constitutes a crucial step towards ensuring a positive experience of visual content creation for everyone. Code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/DIG-In/.

PDF Details

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Improving Text-to-Image Consistency via Automatic Prompt Optimization

Oscar Mañas
Pietro Astolfi
Melissa Hall
Candace Ross
Jack Urbanek
Adina Williams
Aishwarya Agrawal
Adriana Romero-Soriano

Impressive advances in text-to-image (T2I) generative models have yielded a plethora of high performing models which are able to generate aesthetically appealing, photorealistic images. Despite the progress, these models still struggle to produce images that are consistent with the input prompt, oftentimes failing to capture object quantities, relations and attributes properly. Existing solutions to improve prompt-image consistency suffer from the following challenges: (1) they oftentimes require model fine-tuning, (2) they only focus on nearby prompt samples, and (3) they are affected by unfavorable trade-offs among image quality, representation diversity, and prompt-image consistency. In this paper, we address these challenges and introduce a T2I optimization-by-prompting framework, OPT2I, which leverages a large language model (LLM) to improve prompt-image consistency in T2I models. Our framework starts from a user prompt and iteratively generates revised prompts with the goal of maximizing a consistency score. Our extensive validation on two datasets, MSCOCO and PartiPrompts, shows that OPT2I can boost the initial consistency score by up to 24.9% in terms of DSG score while preserving the FID and increasing the recall between generated and real data. Our work paves the way toward building more reliable and robust T2I systems by harnessing the power of LLMs.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

On improved Conditioning Mechanisms and Pre-training Strategies for Diffusion Models

Tariq Berrada
Pietro Astolfi
Melissa Hall
Reyhane Askari-Hemmat
Yohann Benchetrit
Marton Havasi
Matthew Muckley
Karteek Alahari

Large-scale training of latent diffusion models (LDMs) has enabled unprecedented quality in image generation. However, large-scale end-to-end training of these models is computationally costly, and hence most research focuses either on finetuning pretrained models or experiments at smaller scales. In this work we aim to improve the training efficiency and performance of LDMs with the goal of scaling to larger datasets and higher resolutions. We focus our study on two points that are critical for good performance and efficient training: (i) the mechanisms used for semantic level (\eg a text prompt, or class name) and low-level (crop size, random flip, \etc) conditioning of the model, and (ii) pre-training strategies to transfer representations learned on smaller and lower-resolution datasets to larger ones. The main contributions of our work are the following: we present systematic experimental study of these points, we propose a novel conditioning mechanism that disentangles semantic and low-level conditioning, we obtain state-of-the-art performance on CC12M for text-to-image at 512 resolution.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor Annotations

Laura Gustafson
Megan Richards
Melissa Hall
Caner Hazirbas
Diane Bouchacourt
Mark Ibrahim

Despite impressive advances in object-recognition, deep learning systems’ performance degrades significantly across geographies and lower income levels---raising pressing concerns of inequity. Addressing such performance gaps remains a challenge, as little is understood about why performance degrades across incomes or geographies. We take a step in this direction by annotating images from Dollar Street, a popular benchmark of geographically and economically diverse images, labeling each image with factors such as color, shape, and background. These annotations unlock a new granular view into how objects differ across incomes/regions. We then use these object differences to pinpoint model vulnerabilities across incomes and regions. We study a range of modern vision models, finding that performance disparities are most associated with differences in texture, occlusion, and images with darker lighting. We illustrate how insights from our factor labels can surface mitigations to improve models' performance disparities. As an example, we show that mitigating a model's vulnerability to texture can improve performance on the lower income level. We release all the factor annotations along with an interactive dashboardto facilitate research into more equitable vision systems.

PDF Details

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Quantifying and Mitigating the Impact of Label Errors on Model Disparity Metrics

Julius Adebayo
Melissa Hall
Bowen Yu
Bobbie Chern

Errors in labels obtained via human annotation adversely affect a trained model's performance. Existing approaches propose ways to mitigate the effect of label error on a model's downstream accuracy, yet little is known about its impact on a model's group-based disparity metrics\footnote{Group-based disparity metrics like subgroup calibration, false positive rate, false negative rate, equalized odds, and equal opportunity are more often known, colloquially, as \textit{fairness metrics} in the literature. We use the term group-based disparity metrics in this work.}. Here we study the effect of label error on a model's group-based disparity metrics like group calibration. We empirically characterize how varying levels of label error, in both training and test data, affect these disparity metrics. We find that group calibration and other metrics are sensitive to train-time and test-time label error---particularly for minority groups. For the same level of label error, the percentage change in group calibration error for the minority group is on average 1.5 times larger than the change for the majority group. Towards mitigating the impact of training-time label error, we present an approach to estimate how changing a single training input's label affects a model's group disparity metric on a test set. We empirically assess the proposed approach on a variety of datasets and find a 10-40\% improvement, compared to alternative approaches, in identifying training inputs that improve a model's disparity metric. The proposed approach can help surface training inputs that may need to be corrected for improving a model's group-based disparity metrics.

Details