Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Maya Gupta

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

16 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

16

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Expected Pinball Loss For Quantile Regression And Inverse CDF Estimation

  • Taman Narayan
  • Serena Lutong Wang
  • Kevin Robert Canini
  • Maya Gupta

We analyze and improve a recent strategy to train a quantile regression model by minimizing an expected pinball loss over all quantiles. Through an asymptotic convergence analysis, we show that minimizing the expected pinball loss can be more efficient at estimating single quantiles than training with the standard pinball loss for that quantile, an insight that generalizes the known deficiencies of the sample quantile in the unconditioned setting. Then, to guarantee a legitimate inverse CDF, we propose using flexible deep lattice networks with a monotonicity constraint on the quantile input to guarantee non-crossing quantiles, and show lattice models can be regularized to the same location-scale family. Our analysis and experiments on simulated and real datasets show that the proposed method produces state-of-the-art legitimate inverse CDF estimates that are likely to be as good or better for specific target quantiles.

AAAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regression

  • Harikrishna Narasimhan
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya Gupta
  • Serena Wang

We present pairwise fairness metrics for ranking models and regression models that form analogues of statistical fairness notions such as equal opportunity, equal accuracy, and statistical parity. Our pairwise formulation supports both discrete protected groups, and continuous protected attributes. We show that the resulting training problems can be efficiently and effectively solved using existing constrained optimization and robust optimization techniques developed for fair classification. Experiments illustrate the broad applicability and trade-offs of these methods.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groups

  • Serena Wang
  • Wenshuo Guo
  • Harikrishna Narasimhan
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya Gupta
  • Michael Jordan

Many existing fairness criteria for machine learning involve equalizing some metric across protected groups such as race or gender. However, practitioners trying to audit or enforce such group-based criteria can easily face the problem of noisy or biased protected group information. First, we study the consequences of naively relying on noisy protected group labels: we provide an upper bound on the fairness violations on the true groups $G$ when the fairness criteria are satisfied on noisy groups $\hat{G}$. Second, we introduce two new approaches using robust optimization that, unlike the naive approach of only relying on $\hat{G}$, are guaranteed to satisfy fairness criteria on the true protected groups $G$ while minimizing a training objective. We provide theoretical guarantees that one such approach converges to an optimal feasible solution. Using two case studies, we show empirically that the robust approaches achieve better true group fairness guarantees than the naive approach.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

On Making Stochastic Classifiers Deterministic

  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya Gupta
  • Harikrishna Narasimhan

Stochastic classifiers arise in a number of machine learning problems, and have become especially prominent of late, as they often result from constrained optimization problems, e. g. for fairness, churn, or custom losses. Despite their utility, the inherent randomness of stochastic classifiers may cause them to be problematic to use in practice for a variety of practical reasons. In this paper, we attempt to answer the theoretical question of how well a stochastic classifier can be approximated by a deterministic one, and compare several different approaches, proving lower and upper bounds. We also experimentally investigate the pros and cons of these methods, not only in regard to how successfully each deterministic classifier approximates the original stochastic classifier, but also in terms of how well each addresses the other issues that can make stochastic classifiers undesirable.

JMLR Journal 2019 Journal Article

Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goals

  • Andrew Cotter
  • Heinrich Jiang
  • Maya Gupta
  • Serena Wang
  • Taman Narayan
  • Seungil You
  • Karthik Sridharan

We show that many machine learning goals can be expressed as “rate constraints” on a model's predictions. We study the problem of training non-convex models subject to these rate constraints (or other non-convex or non-differentiable constraints). In the non-convex setting, the standard approach of Lagrange multipliers may fail. Furthermore, if the constraints are non-differentiable, then one cannot optimize the Lagrangian with gradient-based methods. To solve these issues, we introduce a new “proxy-Lagrangian” formulation. This leads to an algorithm that, assuming access to an optimization oracle, produces a stochastic classifier by playing a two-player non-zero-sum game solving for what we call a semi-coarse correlated equilibrium, which in turn corresponds to an approximately optimal and feasible solution to the constrained optimization problem. We then give a procedure that shrinks the randomized solution down to a mixture of at most $m+1$ deterministic solutions, given $m$ constraints. This culminates in a procedure that can solve non-convex constrained optimization problems with possibly non-differentiable and non-convex constraints, and enjoys theoretical guarantees. We provide extensive experimental results covering a broad range of policy goals, including various fairness metrics, accuracy, coverage, recall, and churn. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2019. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Optimizing Generalized Rate Metrics with Three Players

  • Harikrishna Narasimhan
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya Gupta

We present a general framework for solving a large class of learning problems with non-linear functions of classification rates. This includes problems where one wishes to optimize a non-decomposable performance metric such as the F-measure or G-mean, and constrained training problems where the classifier needs to satisfy non-linear rate constraints such as predictive parity fairness, distribution divergences or churn ratios. We extend previous two-player game approaches for constrained optimization to an approach with three players to decouple the classifier rates from the non-linear objective, and seek to find an equilibrium of the game. Our approach generalizes many existing algorithms, and makes possible new algorithms with more flexibility and tighter handling of non-linear rate constraints. We provide convergence guarantees for convex functions of rates, and show how our methodology can be extended to handle sums-of-ratios of rates. Experiments on different fairness tasks confirm the efficacy of our approach.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Diminishing Returns Shape Constraints for Interpretability and Regularization

  • Maya Gupta
  • Dara Bahri
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Kevin Canini

We investigate machine learning models that can provide diminishing returns and accelerating returns guarantees to capture prior knowledge or policies about how outputs should depend on inputs. We show that one can build flexible, nonlinear, multi-dimensional models using lattice functions with any combination of concavity/convexity and monotonicity constraints on any subsets of features, and compare to new shape-constrained neural networks. We demonstrate on real-world examples that these shape constrained models can provide tuning-free regularization and improve model understandability.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifier

  • Heinrich Jiang
  • Been Kim
  • Melody Guan
  • Maya Gupta

Knowing when a classifier's prediction can be trusted is useful in many applications and critical for safely using AI. While the bulk of the effort in machine learning research has been towards improving classifier performance, understanding when a classifier's predictions should and should not be trusted has received far less attention. The standard approach is to use the classifier's discriminant or confidence score; however, we show there exists an alternative that is more effective in many situations. We propose a new score, called the {\it trust score}, which measures the agreement between the classifier and a modified nearest-neighbor classifier on the testing example. We show empirically that high (low) trust scores produce surprisingly high precision at identifying correctly (incorrectly) classified examples, consistently outperforming the classifier's confidence score as well as many other baselines. Further, under some mild distributional assumptions, we show that if the trust score for an example is high (low), the classifier will likely agree (disagree) with the Bayes-optimal classifier. Our guarantees consist of non-asymptotic rates of statistical consistency under various nonparametric settings and build on recent developments in topological data analysis.

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functions

  • Seungil You
  • David Ding
  • Kevin Canini
  • Jan Pfeifer
  • Maya Gupta

We propose learning deep models that are monotonic with respect to a user-specified set of inputs by alternating layers of linear embeddings, ensembles of lattices, and calibrators (piecewise linear functions), with appropriate constraints for monotonicity, and jointly training the resulting network. We implement the layers and projections with new computational graph nodes in TensorFlow and use the Adam optimizer and batched stochastic gradients. Experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets show that six-layer monotonic deep lattice networks achieve state-of-the art performance for classification and regression with monotonicity guarantees.

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Fast and Flexible Monotonic Functions with Ensembles of Lattices

  • Mahdi Milani Fard
  • Kevin Canini
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Jan Pfeifer
  • Maya Gupta

For many machine learning problems, there are some inputs that are known to be positively (or negatively) related to the output, and in such cases training the model to respect that monotonic relationship can provide regularization, and makes the model more interpretable. However, flexible monotonic functions are computationally challenging to learn beyond a few features. We break through this barrier by learning ensembles of monotonic calibrated interpolated look-up tables (lattices). A key contribution is an automated algorithm for selecting feature subsets for the ensemble base models. We demonstrate that compared to random forests, these ensembles produce similar or better accuracy, while providing guaranteed monotonicity consistent with prior knowledge, smaller model size and faster evaluation.

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Launch and Iterate: Reducing Prediction Churn

  • Mahdi Milani Fard
  • Quentin Cormier
  • Kevin Canini
  • Maya Gupta

Practical applications of machine learning often involve successive training iterations with changes to features and training examples. Ideally, changes in the output of any new model should only be improvements (wins) over the previous iteration, but in practice the predictions may change neutrally for many examples, resulting in extra net-zero wins and losses, referred to as unnecessary churn. These changes in the predictions are problematic for usability for some applications, and make it harder and more expensive to measure if a change is statistically significant positive. In this paper, we formulate the problem and present a stabilization operator to regularize a classifier towards a previous classifier. We use a Markov chain Monte Carlo stabilization operator to produce a model with more consistent predictions without adversely affecting accuracy. We investigate the properties of the proposal with theoretical analysis. Experiments on benchmark datasets for different classification algorithms demonstrate the method and the resulting reduction in churn.

JMLR Journal 2016 Journal Article

Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tables

  • Maya Gupta
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Jan Pfeifer
  • Konstantin Voevodski
  • Kevin Canini
  • Alexander Mangylov
  • Wojciech Moczydlowski
  • Alexander Van Esbroeck

Real-world machine learning applications may have requirements beyond accuracy, such as fast evaluation times and interpretability. In particular, guaranteed monotonicity of the learned function with respect to some of the inputs can be critical for user confidence. We propose meeting these goals for low-dimensional machine learning problems by learning flexible, monotonic functions using calibrated interpolated look-up tables. We extend the structural risk minimization framework of lattice regression to monotonic functions by adding linear inequality constraints. In addition, we propose jointly learning interpretable calibrations of each feature to normalize continuous features and handle categorical or missing data, at the cost of making the objective non-convex. We address large- scale learning through parallelization, mini-batching, and random sampling of additive regularizer terms. Case studies on real-world problems with up to sixteen features and up to hundreds of millions of training samples demonstrate the proposed monotonic functions can achieve state-of-the-art accuracy in practice while providing greater transparency to users. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2016. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraints

  • Gabriel Goh
  • Andrew Cotter
  • Maya Gupta
  • Michael Friedlander

The goal of minimizing misclassification error on a training set is often just one of several real-world goals that might be defined on different datasets. For example, one may require a classifier to also make positive predictions at some specified rate for some subpopulation (fairness), or to achieve a specified empirical recall. Other real-world goals include reducing churn with respect to a previously deployed model, or stabilizing online training. In this paper we propose handling multiple goals on multiple datasets by training with dataset constraints, using the ramp penalty to accurately quantify costs, and present an efficient algorithm to approximately optimize the resulting non-convex constrained optimization problem. Experiments on both benchmark and real-world industry datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

NeurIPS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Multi-Task Averaging

  • Sergey Feldman
  • Maya Gupta
  • Bela Frigyik

We present a multi-task learning approach to jointly estimate the means of multiple independent data sets. The proposed multi-task averaging (MTA) algorithm results in a convex combination of the single-task averages. We derive the optimal amount of regularization, and show that it can be effectively estimated. Simulations and real data experiments demonstrate that MTA both maximum likelihood and James-Stein estimators, and that our approach to estimating the amount of regularization rivals cross-validation in performance but is more computationally efficient.

NeurIPS Conference 2010 Conference Paper

Shadow Dirichlet for Restricted Probability Modeling

  • Bela Frigyik
  • Maya Gupta
  • Yihua Chen

Although the Dirichlet distribution is widely used, the independence structure of its components limits its accuracy as a model. The proposed shadow Dirichlet distribution manipulates the support in order to model probability mass functions (pmfs) with dependencies or constraints that often arise in real world problems, such as regularized pmfs, monotonic pmfs, and pmfs with bounded variation. We describe some properties of this new class of distributions, provide maximum entropy constructions, give an expectation-maximization method for estimating the mean parameter, and illustrate with real data.

NeurIPS Conference 2009 Conference Paper

Lattice Regression

  • Eric Garcia
  • Maya Gupta

We present a new empirical risk minimization framework for approximating functions from training samples for low-dimensional regression applications where a lattice (look-up table) is stored and interpolated at run-time for an efficient hardware implementation. Rather than evaluating a fitted function at the lattice nodes without regard to the fact that samples will be interpolated, the proposed lattice regression approach estimates the lattice to minimize the interpolation error on the given training samples. Experiments show that lattice regression can reduce mean test error compared to Gaussian process regression for digital color management of printers, an application for which linearly interpolating a look-up table (LUT) is standard. Simulations confirm that lattice regression performs consistently better than the naive approach to learning the lattice, particularly when the density of training samples is low.

v2026.09.13