AAAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper
FLAME: Differentially Private Federated Learning in the Shuffle Model
- Ruixuan Liu
- Yang Cao
- Hong Chen
- Ruoyang Guo
- Masatoshi Yoshikawa
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising machine learning paradigm that enables the analyzer to train a model without collecting users’ raw data. To ensure users’ privacy, differentially private federated learning has been intensively studied. The existing works are mainly based on the curator model or local model of differential privacy. However, both of them have pros and cons. The curator model allows greater accuracy but requires a trusted analyzer. In the local model where users randomize local data before sending them to the analyzer, a trusted analyzer is not required but the accuracy is limited. In this work, by leveraging the privacy amplification effect in the recently proposed shuffle model of differential privacy, we achieve the best of two worlds, i. e. , accuracy in the curator model and strong privacy without relying on any trusted party. We first propose an FL framework in the shuffle model and a simple protocol (SS-Simple) extended from existing work. We find that SS-Simple only provides an insufficient privacy amplification effect in FL since the dimension of the model parameter is quite large. To solve this challenge, we propose an enhanced protocol (SS-Double) to increase the privacy amplification effect by subsampling. Furthermore, for boosting the utility when the model size is greater than the user population, we propose an advanced protocol (SS-Topk) with gradient sparsification techniques. We also provide theoretical analysis and numerical evaluations of the privacy amplification of the proposed protocols. Experiments on realworld dataset validate that SS-Topk improves the testing accuracy by 60. 7% than the local model based FL. We highlight an observation that SS-Topk improves the accuracy by 33. 94% than the curator model based FL without any trusted party. Compared with non-private FL, our protocol SS-Topk only lose 1. 48% accuracy under (2. 348, 5e−6 )-DP per epoch.