Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Luc Moreau

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

9 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

9

AAMAS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Rethinking Explainable AI: Explanations can be Deceiving

  • Peta Masters
  • Daniel Gallagher
  • Luc Moreau
  • Mor Vered

The propensity to overtrust explanations and over-rely on systems that seem transparent makes humans vulnerable to output that conforms to explainable AI (XAI) best practice. Human-centred XAI research seeks to determine the type of explanation most appropriate in any particular context. Other disciplines, meanwhile, provide insights into the way deception has tended to arise in relation to AI systems. Examining XAI research in this context, we find it a perfect melting pot for the generation of deceptive explanations. We demonstrate the problem in a user study and provide and evaluate recommendations for stakeholders.

AAMAS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Actual Trust in Multiagent Systems

  • Michael Akintunde
  • Vahid Yazdanpanah
  • Asieh Salehi Fathabadi
  • Corina Cirstea
  • Mehdi Dastani
  • Luc Moreau

We study how trust can be established in multiagent systems where human and AI agents collaborate. We propose a computational notion of actual trust, emphasising the modelling of trust based on agents’ capacity to deliver tasks in prospect. Unlike reputationbased trust, we consider the specific setting in which agents interact and model a forward-looking notion of trust. We provide a conceptual analysis of actual trust’s characteristics and highlight relevant trust verification tools. By advancing the understanding and verification of trust in collaborative systems, we contribute to responsible and trustworthy human-AI interactions, enhancing reliability in various domains.

JAIR Journal 2016 Journal Article

A Disaster Response System based on Human-Agent Collectives

  • Sarvapali D. Ramchurn
  • Trung Dong Huynh
  • Feng Wu
  • Yukki Ikuno
  • Jack Flann
  • Luc Moreau
  • Joel E. Fischer
  • Wenchao Jiang

Major natural or man-made disasters such as Hurricane Katrina or the 9/11 terror attacks pose significant challenges for emergency responders. First, they have to develop an understanding of the unfolding event either using their own resources or through third-parties such as the local population and agencies. Second, based on the information gathered, they need to deploy their teams in a flexible manner, ensuring that each team performs tasks in The most effective way. Third, given the dynamic nature of a disaster space, and the uncertainties involved in performing rescue missions, information about the disaster space and the actors within it needs to be managed to ensure that responders are always acting on up-to-date and trusted information. Against this background, this paper proposes a novel disaster response system called HAC-ER. Thus HAC-ER interweaves humans and agents, both robotic and software, in social relationships that augment their individual and collective capabilities. To design HAC-ER, we involved end-users including both experts and volunteers in a several participatory design workshops, lab studies, and field trials of increasingly advanced prototypes of individual components of HAC-ER as well as the overall system. This process generated a number of new quantitative and qualitative results but also raised a number of new research questions. HAC-ER thus demonstrates how such Human-Agent Collectives (HACs) can address key challenges in disaster response. Specifically, we show how HAC-ER utilises crowdsourcing combined with machine learning to obtain most important situational awareness from large streams of reports posted by members of the public and trusted organisations. We then show how this information can inform human-agent teams in coordinating multi-UAV deployments, as well as task planning for responders on the ground. Finally, HAC-ER incorporates an infrastructure and the associated intelligence for tracking and utilising the provenance of information shared across the entire system to ensure its accountability. We individually validate each of these elements of HAC-ER and show how they perform against standard (non-HAC) baselines and also elaborate on the evaluation of the overall system.

AAMAS Conference 2013 Conference Paper

AgentSwitch: Towards Smart Energy Tariff Selection

  • Sarvapali D. Ramchurn
  • Michael A. Osborne (University of Oxford, UK)
  • Oliver Parson
  • Talal Rahwan
  • Sasan Maleki
  • Steve Reece
  • Trung D. Huynh
  • Muddasser Alam

We present AgentSwitch, a prototype agent-based platform to solve the tariff selection problem for homeowners. AgentSwitch incorporates novel algorithms that work on the coarse data provided by smart meters to make predictions of hourly energy usage as well as detect (and suggest to the user) deferrable loads that could be shifted to off-peak times to maximise savings. Our demo will allow users to interact with AgentSwitch and explore test user accounts in order to understand the impact of different usage profiles and appliance loads.

AAMAS Conference 2007 Conference Paper

Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems

  • Simon Miles
  • STEVE MUNROE
  • Michael Luck
  • Luc Moreau

Determining the provenance of data, i. e. the process that led to that data, is vital in many disciplines. For example, in science, the process that produced a given result must be demonstrably rigorous for the result to be deemed reliable. A provenance system supports applications in recording adequate documentation about process executions to answer queries regarding provenance, and provides functionality to perform those queries. Several provenance systems are being developed, but all focus on systems in which the components are reactive, for example Web Services that act on the basis of a request, job submission system, etc. This limitation means that questions regarding the motives of autonomous actors, or agents, in such systems remain unanswerable in the general case. Such questions include: who was ultimately responsible for a given effect, what was their reason for initiating the process and does the effect of a process match what was intended to occur by those initiating the process? In this paper, we address this limitation by integrating two solutions: a generic, re-usable framework for representing the provenance of data in service-oriented architectures and a model for describing the goal-oriented delegation and engagement of agents in multi-agent systems. Using these solutions, we present algorithms to answer common questions regarding responsibility and success of a process and evaluate the approach with a simulated healthcare example.

IS Journal 2006 Journal Article

Provenance in Agent-Mediated Healthcare Systems

  • Tamas Kifor
  • Laszlo Z. Varga
  • Javier Vazquez-Salceda
  • Sergio Alvarez
  • STEVEN WILLMOTT
  • Simon Miles
  • Luc Moreau

People are increasingly cooperating to share electronic information and techniques throughout various industries. In healthcare applications, data (a single patient's healthcare history), workflow (procedures carried out on that patient), and logs (a recording of meaningful procedural events) are often distributed among several heterogeneous and autonomous information systems. Understanding a patient's treatment history can help healthcare providers make treatment decisions. Provenance-aware applications can facilitate this process by tracing events, event dependencies, and provider decisions across various healthcare institutions

v2026.09.13