Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Logan Engstrom

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

16 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

16

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Small-to-Large Generalization: Training Data Influences Models Consistently Across Scale

  • Alaa Khaddaj
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Aleksander Madry

Choice of training data distribution greatly influences model behavior. Yet, in large-scale settings, precisely characterizing *how* changes in training data affects predictions is often difficult due to model training costs. Current practice is to instead extrapolate from scaled down, inexpensive-to-train proxy models. However, changes in data do not influence smaller and larger models identically. Therefore, understanding how choice of data affects large-scale models raises the question: how does training data distribution influence model behavior across compute scale? We find that small- and large-scale language model predictions (generally) *do* highly correlate across choice of training data. Equipped with these findings, we characterize how proxy scale affects effectiveness in two downstream proxy model applications: data attribution and dataset selection.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels

  • Logan Engstrom
  • Axel Feldmann
  • Aleksander Madry

When selecting data for training large-scale models, standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. Such filtering yields qualitatively clean datapoints that intuitively should improve model behavior. However, in practice the opposite can often happen: we find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. To develop better methods for selecting data, we start by framing dataset selection as an optimization problem that we can directly solve for: given target tasks, a learning algorithm, and candidate data, select the subset that maximizes model performance. This framework thus avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks. Our resulting method greatly improves language model (LM) performance on both pre-specified tasks and previously unseen tasks. Specifically, choosing target tasks representative of standard LM problems and evaluating on diverse held-out benchmarks, our selected datasets provide a 2x compute multiplier over baseline methods.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

3DB: A Framework for Debugging Computer Vision Models

  • Guillaume Leclerc
  • Hadi Salman
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Sai Vemprala
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Vibhav Vineet
  • Kai Xiao
  • Pengchuan Zhang

We introduce 3DB: an extendable, unified framework for testing and debugging vision models using photorealistic simulation. We demonstrate, through a wide range of use cases, that 3DB allows users to discover vulnerabilities in computer vision systems and gain insights into how models make decisions. 3DB captures and generalizes many robustness analyses from prior work, and enables one to study their interplay. Finally, we find that the insights generated by the system transfer to the physical world. 3DB will be released as a library alongside a set of examples and documentation. We attach 3DB to the submission.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Datamodels: Understanding Predictions with Data and Data with Predictions

  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Sung Min Park
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Guillaume Leclerc
  • Aleksander Madry

We present a conceptual framework, datamodeling, for analyzing the behavior of a model class in terms of the training data. For any fixed “target” example $x$, training set $S$, and learning algorithm, a datamodel is a parameterized function $2^S \to \mathbb{R}$ that for any subset of $S’ \subset S$—using only information about which examples of $S$ are contained in $S’$—predicts the outcome of training a model on $S’$ and evaluating on $x$. Despite the complexity of the underlying process being approximated (e. g. end-to-end training and evaluation of deep neural networks), we show that even simple linear datamodels successfully predict model outputs. We then demonstrate that datamodels give rise to a variety of applications, such as: accurately predicting the effect of dataset counterfactuals; identifying brittle predictions; finding semantically similar examples; quantifying train-test leakage; and embedding data into a well-behaved and feature-rich representation space.

ICLR Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognition

  • Kai Yuanqing Xiao
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Aleksander Madry

We assess the tendency of state-of-the-art object recognition models to depend on signals from image backgrounds. We create a toolkit for disentangling foreground and background signal on ImageNet images, and find that (a) models can achieve non-trivial accuracy by relying on the background alone, (b) models often misclassify images even in the presence of correctly classified foregrounds--up to 88% of the time with adversarially chosen backgrounds, and (c) more accurate models tend to depend on backgrounds less. Our analysis of backgrounds brings us closer to understanding which correlations machine learning models use, and how they determine models' out of distribution performance.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Unadversarial Examples: Designing Objects for Robust Vision

  • Hadi Salman
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Sai Vemprala
  • Aleksander Madry
  • Ashish Kapoor

We study a class of computer vision settings wherein one can modify the design of the objects being recognized. We develop a framework that leverages this capability---and deep networks' unusual sensitivity to input perturbations---to design ``robust objects, '' i. e. , objects that are explicitly optimized to be confidently classified. Our framework yields improved performance on standard benchmarks, a simulated robotics environment, and physical-world experiments.

ICLR Conference 2020 Conference Paper

A Closer Look at Deep Policy Gradients

  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Firdaus Janoos
  • Larry Rudolph
  • Aleksander Madry

We study how the behavior of deep policy gradient algorithms reflects the conceptual framework motivating their development. To this end, we propose a fine-grained analysis of state-of-the-art methods based on key elements of this framework: gradient estimation, value prediction, and optimization landscapes. Our results show that the behavior of deep policy gradient algorithms often deviates from what their motivating framework would predict: surrogate rewards do not match the true reward landscape, learned value estimators fail to fit the true value function, and gradient estimates poorly correlate with the "true" gradient. The mismatch between predicted and empirical behavior we uncover highlights our poor understanding of current methods, and indicates the need to move beyond current benchmark-centric evaluation methods.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?

  • Hadi Salman
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Ashish Kapoor
  • Aleksander Madry

Transfer learning is a widely-used paradigm in deep learning, where models pre-trained on standard datasets can be efficiently adapted to downstream tasks. Typically, better pre-trained models yield better transfer results, suggesting that initial accuracy is a key aspect of transfer learning performance. In this work, we identify another such aspect: we find that adversarially robust models, while less accurate, often perform better than their standard-trained counterparts when used for transfer learning. Specifically, we focus on adversarially robust ImageNet classifiers, and show that they yield improved accuracy on a standard suite of downstream classification tasks. Further analysis uncovers more differences between robust and standard models in the context of transfer learning. Our results are consistent with (and in fact, add to) recent hypotheses stating that robustness leads to improved feature representations. Code and models is available in the supplementary material.

ICML Conference 2020 Conference Paper

From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarks

  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Aleksander Madry

Building rich machine learning datasets in a scalable manner often necessitates a crowd-sourced data collection pipeline. In this work, we use human studies to investigate the consequences of employing such a pipeline, focusing on the popular ImageNet dataset. We study how specific design choices in the ImageNet creation process impact the fidelity of the resulting dataset—including the introduction of biases that state-of-the-art models exploit. Our analysis pinpoints how a noisy data collection pipeline can lead to a systematic misalignment between the resulting benchmark and the real-world task it serves as a proxy for. Finally, our findings emphasize the need to augment our current model training and evaluation toolkit to take such misalignment into account.

ICML Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replication

  • Logan Engstrom
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Jacob Steinhardt
  • Aleksander Madry

Dataset replication is a useful tool for assessing whether improvements in test accuracy on a specific benchmark correspond to improvements in models’ ability to generalize reliably. In this work, we present unintuitive yet significant ways in which standard approaches to dataset replication introduce statistical bias, skewing the resulting observations. We study ImageNet-v2, a replication of the ImageNet dataset on which models exhibit a significant (11-14%) drop in accuracy, even after controlling for selection frequency, a human-in-the-loop measure of data quality. We show that after remeasuring selection frequencies and correcting for statistical bias, only an estimated 3. 6% of the original 11. 7% accuracy drop remains unaccounted for. We conclude with concrete recommendations for recognizing and avoiding bias in dataset replication. Code for our study is publicly available: https: //git. io/data-rep-analysis.

ICLR Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Implementation Matters in Deep RL: A Case Study on PPO and TRPO

  • Logan Engstrom
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Firdaus Janoos
  • Larry Rudolph
  • Aleksander Madry

We study the roots of algorithmic progress in deep policy gradient algorithms through a case study on two popular algorithms: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO). Specifically, we investigate the consequences of "code-level optimizations:" algorithm augmentations found only in implementations or described as auxiliary details to the core algorithm. Seemingly of secondary importance, such optimizations turn out to have a major impact on agent behavior. Our results show that they (a) are responsible for most of PPO's gain in cumulative reward over TRPO, and (b) fundamentally change how RL methods function. These insights show the difficulty, and importance, of attributing performance gains in deep reinforcement learning.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features

  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Brandon Tran
  • Aleksander Madry

Adversarial examples have attracted significant attention in machine learning, but the reasons for their existence and pervasiveness remain unclear. We demonstrate that adversarial examples can be directly attributed to the presence of non-robust features: features (derived from patterns in the data distribution) that are highly predictive, yet brittle and (thus) incomprehensible to humans. After capturing these features within a theoretical framework, we establish their widespread existence in standard datasets. Finally, we present a simple setting where we can rigorously tie the phenomena we observe in practice to a {\em misalignment} between the (human-specified) notion of robustness and the inherent geometry of the data.

ICML Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustness

  • Logan Engstrom
  • Brandon Tran
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Ludwig Schmidt
  • Aleksander Madry

The study of adversarial robustness has so far largely focused on perturbations bound in $\ell_p$-norms. However, state-of-the-art models turn out to be also vulnerable to other, more natural classes of perturbations such as translations and rotations. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the vulnerability of neural network–based classifiers to rotations and translations. While data augmentation offers relatively small robustness, we use ideas from robust optimization and test-time input aggregation to significantly improve robustness. Finally we find that, in contrast to the $\ell_p$-norm case, first-order methods cannot reliably find worst-case perturbations. This highlights spatial robustness as a fundamentally different setting requiring additional study.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Image Synthesis with a Single (Robust) Classifier

  • Shibani Santurkar
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Dimitris Tsipras
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Brandon Tran
  • Aleksander Madry

We show that the basic classification framework alone can be used to tackle some of the most challenging tasks in image synthesis. In contrast to other state-of-the-art approaches, the toolkit we develop is rather minimal: it uses a single, off-the-shelf classifier for all these tasks. The crux of our approach is that we train this classifier to be adversarially robust. It turns out that adversarial robustness is precisely what we need to directly manipulate salient features of the input. Overall, our findings demonstrate the utility of robustness in the broader machine learning context.

ICML Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information

  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Anish Athalye
  • Jessy Lin

Current neural network-based classifiers are susceptible to adversarial examples even in the black-box setting, where the attacker only has query access to the model. In practice, the threat model for real-world systems is often more restrictive than the typical black-box model where the adversary can observe the full output of the network on arbitrarily many chosen inputs. We define three realistic threat models that more accurately characterize many real-world classifiers: the query-limited setting, the partial-information setting, and the label-only setting. We develop new attacks that fool classifiers under these more restrictive threat models, where previous methods would be impractical or ineffective. We demonstrate that our methods are effective against an ImageNet classifier under our proposed threat models. We also demonstrate a targeted black-box attack against a commercial classifier, overcoming the challenges of limited query access, partial information, and other practical issues to break the Google Cloud Vision API.

ICML Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Synthesizing Robust Adversarial Examples

  • Anish Athalye
  • Logan Engstrom
  • Andrew Ilyas
  • Kevin Kwok

Standard methods for generating adversarial examples for neural networks do not consistently fool neural network classifiers in the physical world due to a combination of viewpoint shifts, camera noise, and other natural transformations, limiting their relevance to real-world systems. We demonstrate the existence of robust 3D adversarial objects, and we present the first algorithm for synthesizing examples that are adversarial over a chosen distribution of transformations. We synthesize two-dimensional adversarial images that are robust to noise, distortion, and affine transformation. We apply our algorithm to complex three-dimensional objects, using 3D-printing to manufacture the first physical adversarial objects. Our results demonstrate the existence of 3D adversarial objects in the physical world.

v2026.09.13