Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Linzi Xing

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Efficiently Serving Large Multimodal Models Using EPD Disaggregation

  • Gursimran Singh
  • Xinglu Wang
  • Yifan Hu
  • Timothy Tin Long Yu
  • Linzi Xing
  • Wei Jiang
  • Zhefeng Wang
  • Xiaolong Bai

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) extend Large Language Models (LLMs) by handling diverse inputs such as images, audio, and video, but at the cost of adding a multimodal encoding stage that increases both computational and memory overhead. This step negatively affects key Service Level Objectives (SLOs), such as time to first token (TTFT) and time per output token (TPOT). We introduce Encode-Prefill-Decode (EPD) Disaggregation, a novel framework that separates the encoding, prefill, and decode stages onto dedicated resources. Unlike current systems, which bundle encoding and prefill together, our approach decouples these steps, unlocking new opportunities and optimizations. These include a mechanism to cache multimedia tokens for efficient transfer, a novel way to parallelize the encoding load within a request, a module for optimal resource allocation for disaggregated serving, and a novel role-switching method to handle changing workload characteristics. Experimental evaluations with popular LMMs show substantial gains in memory efficiency (up to 15$\times$ lower peak memory utilization), batch sizes (up to 22$\times$ larger), 10$\times$ more images per request, and 2. 2$\times$ larger KV caches. Furthermore, it leads to significant improvements in SLO attainment (up to 90–100% improvement) and TTFT (up to 71% reduction), compared to systems that do not disaggregate. The code is available at https: //github. com/vbdi/epdserve.

AAAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Predicting Above-Sentence Discourse Structure Using Distant Supervision from Topic Segmentation

  • Patrick Huber
  • Linzi Xing
  • Giuseppe Carenini

RST-style discourse parsing plays a vital role in many NLP tasks, revealing the underlying semantic/pragmatic structure of potentially complex and diverse documents. Despite its importance, one of the most prevailing limitations in modern day discourse parsing is the lack of large-scale datasets. To overcome the data sparsity issue, distantly supervised approaches from tasks like sentiment analysis and summarization have been recently proposed. Here, we extend this line of research by exploiting distant supervision from topic segmentation, which can arguably provide a strong and oftentimes complementary signal for high-level discourse structures. Experiments on two human-annotated discourse treebanks confirm that our proposal generates accurate tree structures on sentence and paragraph level, consistently outperforming previous distantly supervised models on the sentence-todocument task and occasionally reaching even higher scores on the sentence-to-paragraph level.

AAAI Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Diagnosing and Improving Topic Models by Analyzing Posterior Variability

  • Linzi Xing
  • Michael Paul

Bayesian inference methods for probabilistic topic models can quantify uncertainty in the parameters, which has primarily been used to increase the robustness of parameter estimates. In this work, we explore other rich information that can be obtained by analyzing the posterior distributions in topic models. Experimenting with latent Dirichlet allocation on two datasets, we propose ideas incorporating information about the posterior distributions at the topic level and at the word level. At the topic level, we propose a metric called topic stability that measures the variability of the topic parameters under the posterior. We show that this metric is correlated with human judgments of topic quality as well as with the consistency of topics appearing across multiple models. At the word level, we experiment with different methods for adjusting individual word probabilities within topics based on their uncertainty. Humans prefer words ranked by our adjusted estimates nearly twice as often when compared to the traditional approach. Finally, we describe how the ideas presented in this work could potentially applied to other predictive or exploratory models in future work.

v2026.09.13