Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Libin Wang

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

UniAlignment: Semantic Alignment for Unified Image Generation, Understanding, Manipulation and Perception

  • Xinyang Song
  • Libin Wang
  • Weining Wang
  • Shaozhen Liu
  • DanDan Zheng
  • Jingdong Chen
  • Qi Li
  • Zhenan Sun

The remarkable success of diffusion models in text-to-image generation has sparked growing interest in expanding their capabilities to a variety of multi-modal tasks, including image understanding, manipulation, and perception. These tasks require advanced semantic comprehension across both visual and textual modalities, especially in scenarios involving complex semantic instructions. However, existing approaches often rely heavily on vision-language models (VLMs) or modular designs for semantic guidance, leading to fragmented architectures and computational inefficiency. To address these challenges, we propose UniAlignment, a unified multimodal generation framework within a single diffusion transformer. UniAlignment introduces a dual-stream diffusion training strategy that incorporates both intrinsic-modal semantic alignment and cross-modal semantic alignment, thereby enhancing the model's cross-modal consistency and instruction-following robustness. Additionally, we present SemGen-Bench, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multimodal semantic consistency under complex textual instructions. Extensive experiments across multiple tasks and benchmarks demonstrate that UniAlignment outperforms existing baselines, underscoring the significant potential of diffusion models in unified multimodal generation.

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

From Individual to Universal: Regularized Multi-view Joint Representation for Multi-view Subspace-Preserving Recovery

  • Libin Wang
  • Yulong Wang
  • Xinwei He
  • Qiwei Xie
  • Kit Ian Kou
  • Yuan Yan Tang

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of Multi- view Subspace Classification (MSCla) and Multi-view Subspace Clustering (MSClu) methods for various applications. However, their theoretical foundation have not been well explored and understood. In this paper, we investigate the multi-view subspace-preserving recovery theory, which is the theoretical underpinnings for MSCla and MSClu methods. Specifically, we derive novel geometrically interpretable conditions for the success of multi-view subspace-preserving recovery. Compared with prior related works, we make the following innovations: First, our theory does not require the equality constraint, which is a common requirement in prior theoretical works and may be too restrictive in reality. Second, we provide both Individual Theoretical Guarantee (ITG) and Universal Theoretical Guarantee (UTG) for multi-view subspace-preserving recovery while prior works only give the UTG. Third, we also apply the proposed theory to establish theoretical guarantees for MSCla and MSClu, respectively. Numerical results validate the proposed theory for multi-view subspace-preserving recovery.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs

  • Xingang Guo
  • Yaxin Li
  • XiangYi Kong
  • YILAN JIANG
  • Xiayu Zhao
  • Zhihua Gong
  • Yufan Zhang
  • Daixuan Li

Modern engineering, spanning electrical, mechanical, aerospace, civil, and computer disciplines, stands as a cornerstone of human civilization and the foundation of our society. However, engineering design poses a fundamentally different challenge for large language models (LLMs) compared with traditional textbook-style problem solving or factual question answering. Although existing benchmarks have driven progress in areas such as language understanding, code synthesis, and scientific problem solving, real-world engineering design demands the synthesis of domain knowledge, navigation of complex trade-offs, and management of the tedious processes that consume much of practicing engineers' time. Despite these shared challenges across engineering disciplines, no benchmark currently captures the unique demands of engineering design work. In this work, we introduce EngDesign, an Engineering Design benchmark that evaluates LLMs' abilities to perform practical design tasks across nine engineering domains. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on factual recall or question answering, EngDesign uniquely emphasizes LLMs' ability to synthesize domain knowledge, reason under constraints, and generate functional, objective-oriented engineering designs. Each task in EngDesign represents a real-world engineering design problem, accompanied by a detailed task description specifying design goals, constraints, and performance requirements. EngDesign pioneers a simulation-based evaluation paradigm that moves beyond textbook knowledge to assess genuine engineering design capabilities and shifts evaluation from static answer checking to dynamic, simulation-driven functional verification, marking a crucial step toward realizing the vision of engineering Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

v2026.09.13